Song Myeong Jun, Bae Si Hyun, Lee June Sung, Lee Sung Won, Song Do Seon, You Chan Ran, Choi Jong Young, Yoon Seung Kew
Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
Department of Internal Medicine, Inje University Ilsan Paik Hospital, Goyang, Korea.
Korean J Intern Med. 2016 Mar;31(2):242-52. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2015.112. Epub 2016 Feb 15.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: We compared the recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and the survival of patients who received radiofrequency ablation (RFA) after transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with patients treated with TACE or RFA alone.
This study included 201 patients with HCC, who were consecutively enrolled at Seoul St. Mary's Hospital between December 2004 and February 2010. Inclusion criteria were a single HCC ≤ 5.0 cm or up to three HCCs ≤ 3.0 cm. We used a propensity score model to compare HCC patients (n = 87) who received RFA after TACE (TACE + RFA) with those who received TACE (n = 71) or RFA alone (n = 43).
The median follow-up period was 33.3 months (range, 6.8 to 80.9). The TACE + RFA group showed significantly lower local recurrence than the RFA or TACE groups (hazard ratio [HR], 0.309; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.130 to 0.736; p = 0.008; and HR, 0.352; 95% CI, 0.158 to 0.787; p = 0.011, respectively). The overall survival was significantly better in the TACE + RFA group compared to the RFA group (HR, 0.422; 95% CI, 0.185 to 0.964; p = 0.041). However, the survival benefit was not different between the TACE + RFA and TACE groups (p = 0.124). Subgroup analysis showed that among patients with a tumor size < 3 cm, the TACE + RFA group had significantly better long-term survival than those in the TACE or RFA groups (p = 0.017, p = 0.004, respectively).
TACE + RFA combination treatment showed favorable local recurrence and better overall survival rates in early-stage HCC patients. Patients with tumors < 3 cm are likely to benefit more from TACE + RFA combination treatment. Additional studies are needed for the selection of suitable HCC patients for TACE + RFA treatment.
背景/目的:我们比较了经动脉化疗栓塞术(TACE)后接受射频消融(RFA)的肝细胞癌(HCC)患者的复发情况及生存率,与单纯接受TACE或RFA治疗的患者进行对比。
本研究纳入了201例HCC患者,于2004年12月至2010年2月在首尔圣玛丽医院连续入组。纳入标准为单个HCC≤5.0 cm或最多三个HCC≤3.0 cm。我们使用倾向评分模型来比较TACE后接受RFA的HCC患者(n = 87)(TACE + RFA组)与接受TACE治疗的患者(n = 71)或单纯接受RFA治疗的患者(n = 43)。
中位随访期为33.3个月(范围6.8至80.9个月)。TACE + RFA组的局部复发率显著低于RFA组或TACE组(风险比[HR],0.309;95%置信区间[CI],0.130至0.736;p = 0.008;以及HR,0.352;95% CI,0.158至0.787;p = 0.011)。与RFA组相比,TACE + RFA组的总生存率显著更高(HR,0.422;95% CI,0.185至0.964;p = 0.041)。然而,TACE + RFA组与TACE组之间的生存获益无差异(p = 0.124)。亚组分析显示,在肿瘤大小<3 cm的患者中,TACE + RFA组的长期生存率显著高于TACE组或RFA组患者(分别为p = 0.017,p = 0.004)。
TACE + RFA联合治疗在早期HCC患者中显示出良好的局部复发率和更高的总生存率。肿瘤<3 cm的患者可能从TACE + RFA联合治疗中获益更多。需要进一步研究以筛选适合TACE + RFA治疗的HCC患者。