• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗保险受益人群中艰难梭菌结肠炎的住院后治疗方案和再入院情况。

Post-hospitalization Treatment Regimen and Readmission for C. difficile Colitis in Medicare Beneficiaries.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Room S3-731, 55 Lake Avenue North, Worcester, MA, 01655, USA.

Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA.

出版信息

World J Surg. 2018 Jan;42(1):246-253. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-4139-8.

DOI:10.1007/s00268-017-4139-8
PMID:28744593
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7880236/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

C. difficile (CDI) has surpassed methicillin-resistant staph aureus as the most common nosocomial infection with recurrence reaching 30% and the elderly being disproportionately affected. We hypothesized that post-discharge antibiotic therapy for continued CDI treatment reduces readmissions.

STUDY DESIGN

We queried a 5% random sample of Medicare claims (2009-2011 Part A and Part D; n = 864,604) for hospitalizations with primary or secondary diagnosis of CDI. We compared demographics, comorbidities, and post-discharge CDI treatment (no CDI treatment, oral metronidazole only, oral vancomycin only, or both) between patients readmitted with a primary diagnosis of CDI within 90 days and patients not readmitted for any reason using univariate tests of association and multivariable models.

RESULTS

Of 7042 patients discharged alive, 945 were readmitted ≤90 days with CDI (13%), while 1953 were not readmitted for any reason (28%). Patients discharged on dual therapy had the highest rates of readmission (50%), followed by no post-discharge CDI treatment (43%), vancomycin only (28%), and metronidazole only (19%). Patients discharged on only metronidazole (OR 0.28) or only vancomycin (OR 0.42) had reduced odds of 90-day readmission compared to patients discharged on no CDI treatment. Patients discharged on dual therapy did not vary in odds of readmission.

CONCLUSIONS

Thirteen percent of patients discharged with CDI are readmitted within 90 days. Patients discharged with single-drug therapy for CDI had lower readmission rates compared to patients discharged on no ongoing CDI treatment suggesting that short-term monotherapy may be beneficial in inducing eradication and preventing relapse. Half of patients requiring dual therapy required readmission, suggesting patients with symptoms severe enough to warrant discharge on dual therapy may benefit from longer hospitalization.

摘要

背景

艰难梭菌(CDI)已超过耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌,成为最常见的医院获得性感染,其复发率达到 30%,且老年人的感染率不成比例地升高。我们假设,出院后的抗生素治疗继续治疗 CDI 可降低再入院率。

研究设计

我们查询了 Medicare 索赔的 5%随机样本(2009-2011 年 A 部分和 D 部分;n=864604),这些索赔与 CDI 的主要或次要诊断有关。我们比较了 90 天内因 CDI 而再次入院的患者和因任何其他原因而未再次入院的患者的人口统计学、合并症和出院后的 CDI 治疗(无 CDI 治疗、仅口服甲硝唑、仅口服万古霉素或两者均有),使用单变量关联检验和多变量模型进行比较。

结果

在 7042 名存活出院的患者中,有 945 名(13%)在 90 天内因 CDI 而再次入院,而有 1953 名(28%)因任何其他原因而未再次入院。接受双联治疗的患者再入院率最高(50%),其次是无出院后 CDI 治疗(43%)、仅用万古霉素(28%)和仅用甲硝唑(19%)。与无 CDI 治疗的患者相比,仅用甲硝唑(OR 0.28)或仅用万古霉素(OR 0.42)出院的患者 90 天再入院的可能性较低。接受双联治疗的患者的再入院几率没有差异。

结论

13%出院时有 CDI 的患者在 90 天内再次入院。与无持续 CDI 治疗的患者相比,接受单药治疗的 CDI 患者的再入院率较低,这表明短期单药治疗可能有助于根除并预防复发。需要双联治疗的一半患者需要再次入院,这表明症状严重到需要双联治疗出院的患者可能受益于更长时间的住院治疗。

相似文献

1
Post-hospitalization Treatment Regimen and Readmission for C. difficile Colitis in Medicare Beneficiaries.医疗保险受益人群中艰难梭菌结肠炎的住院后治疗方案和再入院情况。
World J Surg. 2018 Jan;42(1):246-253. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-4139-8.
2
Does Addition of Intravenous Metronidazole to Oral Vancomycin Improve Outcomes in Clostridioides difficile Infection?静脉注射甲硝唑是否能改善艰难梭菌感染的疗效?
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Dec 3;71(9):2414-2420. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz1115.
3
Oral Vancomycin Monotherapy Versus Combination Therapy in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients With Uncomplicated Clostridium difficile Infection: A Retrospective Cohort Study.口服万古霉素单药治疗与联合治疗在实体器官移植受者单纯艰难梭菌感染中的应用:一项回顾性队列研究
Transplant Proc. 2018 Jan-Feb;50(1):137-141. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2017.11.016.
4
Antibiotics for Treatment of Clostridium difficile Infection in Hospitalized Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease.用于治疗炎症性肠病住院患者艰难梭菌感染的抗生素
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014 Sep;58(9):5054-9. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02606-13. Epub 2014 Jun 9.
5
Characterization of continued antibacterial therapy after diagnosis of hospital-onset Clostridium difficile infection: implications for antimicrobial stewardship.诊断医院获得性艰难梭菌感染后继续抗菌治疗的特征:对抗菌药物管理的意义。
Pharmacotherapy. 2012 Aug;32(8):744-54. doi: 10.1002/j.1875-9114.2012.01160.x.
6
Non-inferiority of metronidazole to vancomycin in the treatment of first episode non-severe Clostridioides difficile infection: a single center retrospective cohort study.甲硝唑与万古霉素治疗首发非重症艰难梭菌感染的非劣效性:一项单中心回顾性队列研究。
Infection. 2022 Aug;50(4):973-980. doi: 10.1007/s15010-022-01778-y. Epub 2022 Feb 22.
7
Neighborhood disadvantage and 30-day readmission risk following Clostridioides difficile infection hospitalization.社区劣势与艰难梭菌感染住院后 30 天再入院风险。
BMC Infect Dis. 2020 Oct 16;20(1):762. doi: 10.1186/s12879-020-05481-x.
8
Fidaxomicin versus metronidazole, vancomycin and their combination for initial episode, first recurrence and severe Clostridioides difficile infection - An observational cohort study. fidaxomicin 与甲硝唑、万古霉素及其联合治疗首发、首次复发和严重艰难梭菌感染的疗效比较:一项观察性队列研究。
Int J Infect Dis. 2021 Feb;103:226-233. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.11.004. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
9
Healthcare resource utilization for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection in a large university hospital in Houston, Texas.德克萨斯州休斯顿一家大型大学医院复发性艰难梭菌感染的医疗资源利用情况。
PLoS One. 2014 Jul 24;9(7):e102848. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0102848. eCollection 2014.
10
Use of International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes and medication use data to identify nosocomial Clostridium difficile infection.利用国际疾病分类,第九修订版,临床修正码和药物使用数据来识别医院获得性艰难梭菌感染。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2009 Nov;30(11):1070-6. doi: 10.1086/606164.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk Factors for Hospital Readmission for Infection: A Statewide Retrospective Cohort Study.感染导致再次入院的风险因素:一项全州范围的回顾性队列研究。
Pathogens. 2022 May 8;11(5):555. doi: 10.3390/pathogens11050555.
2
Clostridium difficile: Diagnosis and the Consequence of Over Diagnosis.艰难梭菌:诊断与过度诊断的后果
Infect Dis Ther. 2021 Jun;10(2):687-697. doi: 10.1007/s40121-021-00417-7. Epub 2021 Mar 26.

本文引用的文献

1
Risk factors for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.艰难梭菌反复感染的危险因素:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2015 Apr;36(4):452-60. doi: 10.1017/ice.2014.88. Epub 2015 Jan 28.
2
Diagnosis and treatment of Clostridium difficile in adults: a systematic review.成人艰难梭菌的诊断与治疗:系统评价。
JAMA. 2015 Jan 27;313(4):398-408. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.17103.
3
Predictors and outcomes of readmission for Clostridium difficile in a national sample of medicare beneficiaries.医保受益人的全国样本中艰难梭菌再入院的预测因素及结果
J Gastrointest Surg. 2015 Jan;19(1):88-99; discussion 99. doi: 10.1007/s11605-014-2638-6. Epub 2014 Nov 19.
4
The rise in Clostridium difficile infection incidence among hospitalized adults in the United States: 2001-2010.2001 - 2010年美国住院成人艰难梭菌感染发病率的上升情况
Am J Infect Control. 2014 Oct;42(10):1028-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2014.06.011.
5
Multi-institution case-control and cohort study of risk factors for the development and mortality of Clostridium difficile infections in Japan.日本艰难梭菌感染发生及死亡危险因素的多机构病例对照和队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2014 Sep 3;4(9):e005665. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005665.
6
A prospective study of community-associated Clostridium difficile infections: the role of antibiotics and co-infections.一项社区相关性艰难梭菌感染的前瞻性研究:抗生素和合并感染的作用。
J Infect. 2014 Aug;69(2):134-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2014.04.002. Epub 2014 Apr 26.
7
Epidemiology and outcomes of community-acquired Clostridium difficile infections in Medicare beneficiaries.医疗保险受益人群中社区获得性艰难梭菌感染的流行病学和结局。
J Am Coll Surg. 2014 Jun;218(6):1141-1147.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.01.053. Epub 2014 Feb 28.
8
Parameters for the mathematical modelling of Clostridium difficile acquisition and transmission: a systematic review.艰难梭菌感染获得与传播的数学建模参数:一项系统综述
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 20;8(12):e84224. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084224. eCollection 2013.
9
European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases: update of the treatment guidance document for Clostridium difficile infection.欧洲临床微生物学和传染病学会:艰难梭菌感染治疗指南文件的更新。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014 Mar;20 Suppl 2:1-26. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12418.
10
Predictors of first recurrence of Clostridium difficile infection: implications for initial management.艰难梭菌感染首次复发的预测因素:对初始治疗的影响。
Clin Infect Dis. 2012 Aug;55 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S77-87. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis356.