Suppr超能文献

甲硝唑与万古霉素治疗首发非重症艰难梭菌感染的非劣效性:一项单中心回顾性队列研究。

Non-inferiority of metronidazole to vancomycin in the treatment of first episode non-severe Clostridioides difficile infection: a single center retrospective cohort study.

机构信息

Infectious Diseases Unit, Lady Davis Carmel Medical Center, 7 Michal st, 34362, Haifa, Israel.

Ruth and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.

出版信息

Infection. 2022 Aug;50(4):973-980. doi: 10.1007/s15010-022-01778-y. Epub 2022 Feb 22.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We sought to assess the effectiveness of oral vancomycin compared to metronidazole on recurrence and mortality among hospitalized patients with non-severe Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI).

METHODS

A single center retrospective cohort study was conducted, including adult patients hospitalized between 2015 and 2020 with a first episode of non-severe CDI, treated with metronidazole or vancomycin as monotherapy for at least 10 days. We assessed recurrence of CDI requiring hospitalization (primary outcome) and all-cause mortality up to 8 weeks, post discharge.

RESULTS

Overall, 160 patients were treated with vancomycin and 149 treated with metronidazole. Re-hospitalization within 8 weeks due to CDI occurred in 10 (6.2%) patients in the vancomycin group, and 13 (8.7%) in the metronidazole group (P value = 0.407). Eight-week mortality occurred in 39 patients (26.2%) in the metronidazole group and 46 patients (28.8%) in the vancomycin group (P value = 0.61). After adjusting for age, gender, Ischemic heart disease, white blood cell count, neutrophile count and CRP, there was no significant difference between the two treatments (Re-hospitalization in 8 weeks due to CDI P = 0.5059; In-hospital death P = 0.7950; 4-week mortality P = 0.2988; 8-week mortality P = 0.8237).

CONCLUSION

There is no benefit of using vancomycin compared to metronidazole concerning recurrence rate requiring hospitalization, in-hospital and up to 4- and 8-week mortality rate in non-severe first episode of CDI.

摘要

目的

我们旨在评估口服万古霉素与甲硝唑相比在非重症艰难梭菌感染(CDI)住院患者中的复发和死亡率的有效性。

方法

进行了一项单中心回顾性队列研究,纳入 2015 年至 2020 年间首次发生非重症 CDI 且接受甲硝唑或万古霉素单药治疗至少 10 天的成年住院患者。我们评估了需要住院治疗的 CDI 复发(主要结局)以及出院后 8 周内的全因死亡率。

结果

共有 160 例患者接受万古霉素治疗,149 例患者接受甲硝唑治疗。万古霉素组中有 10 例(6.2%)患者在 8 周内因 CDI 再次住院,甲硝唑组中有 13 例(8.7%)(P 值=0.407)。甲硝唑组中有 39 例(26.2%)和万古霉素组中有 46 例(28.8%)患者在 8 周内死亡(P 值=0.61)。在校正年龄、性别、缺血性心脏病、白细胞计数、中性粒细胞计数和 CRP 后,两种治疗方法之间无显著差异(8 周内因 CDI 再次住院 P=0.5059;住院内死亡 P=0.7950;4 周死亡率 P=0.2988;8 周死亡率 P=0.8237)。

结论

在非重症首次 CDI 中,与甲硝唑相比,使用万古霉素在需要住院治疗的复发率、住院内和 4 至 8 周死亡率方面没有优势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验