Robertson A, MacDonald C
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1986 Jun;24(6):1639-43. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(86)90499-5.
The effects of the atypical neuroleptics clozapine, thioridazine and sulpiride on behaviors induced by apomorphine were recorded, using a time-sampling observational paradigm. A low dose of apomorphine (0.1 mg/kg, SC) produced hypomotility. Of the neuroleptics tested, only sulpiride antagonized this hypomotility. Apomorphine in higher doses (0.2-1.0 mg/kg, SC) produced stereotyped behaviors (sniffing down and licking or gnawing). All three atypical neuroleptics antagonized stereotypy. The effects of sulpiride on apomorphine-induced hypomotility and stereotypy are consistent with the notion that this drug has strong presynaptic and weak postsynaptic blocking effects at dopamine receptors. The mechanisms of action of clozapine and thioridazine may be different from that of sulpiride. Perhaps the anticholinergic activities of these drugs mediate some of their behavioral effects. The effects of these atypical neuroleptics on apomorphine-induced stereotypy are opposite in direction to their effects on amphetamine-induced stereotypy, suggesting that these two behavioral patterns are not measures of the same neural process.
采用定时抽样观察模式,记录了非典型抗精神病药物氯氮平、硫利达嗪和舒必利对阿扑吗啡诱导行为的影响。低剂量阿扑吗啡(0.1mg/kg,皮下注射)可导致运动减少。在所测试的抗精神病药物中,只有舒必利能对抗这种运动减少。高剂量阿扑吗啡(0.2 - 1.0mg/kg,皮下注射)可产生刻板行为(嗅探、舔舐或啃咬)。所有三种非典型抗精神病药物均能对抗刻板行为。舒必利对阿扑吗啡诱导的运动减少和刻板行为的影响与该药物在多巴胺受体处具有强大的突触前阻断作用和较弱的突触后阻断作用这一观点一致。氯氮平和硫利达嗪的作用机制可能与舒必利不同。或许这些药物的抗胆碱能活性介导了它们的一些行为效应。这些非典型抗精神病药物对阿扑吗啡诱导的刻板行为的影响与其对苯丙胺诱导的刻板行为的影响方向相反,表明这两种行为模式并非同一神经过程的指标。