Lim Koeun, Wang Wei, Merfeld Daniel M
Jenks Vestibular Physiology Lab, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, Massachusetts.
Program in Speech and Hearing Bioscience and Technology, MIT-Harvard Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
J Neurophysiol. 2017 Nov 1;118(5):2636-2653. doi: 10.1152/jn.00318.2017. Epub 2017 Jul 26.
Humans can subjectively yet quantitatively assess choice confidence based on perceptual precision even when a perceptual decision is made without an immediate reward or feedback. However, surprisingly little is known about choice confidence. Here we investigate the dynamics of choice confidence by merging two parallel conceptual frameworks of decision making, signal detection theory and sequential analyses (i.e., drift-diffusion modeling). Specifically, to capture end-point statistics of binary choice and confidence, we built on a previous study that defined choice confidence in terms of psychophysics derived from signal detection theory. At the same time, we augmented this mathematical model to include accumulator dynamics of a drift-diffusion model to characterize the time dependence of the choice behaviors in a standard forced-choice paradigm in which stimulus duration is controlled by the operator. Human subjects performed a subjective visual vertical task, simultaneously reporting binary orientation choice and probabilistic confidence. Both binary choice and confidence experimental data displayed statistics and dynamics consistent with both signal detection theory and evidence accumulation, respectively. Specifically, the computational simulations showed that the unbounded evidence accumulator model fits the confidence data better than the classical bounded model, while bounded and unbounded models were indistinguishable for binary choice data. These results suggest that the brain can utilize mechanisms consistent with signal detection theory-especially when judging confidence without time pressure. We found that choice confidence data show dynamics consistent with evidence accumulation for a forced-choice subjective visual vertical task. We also found that the evidence accumulation appeared unbounded when judging confidence, which suggests that the brain utilizes mechanisms consistent with signal detection theory to determine choice confidence.
即使在做出感知决策时没有即时奖励或反馈,人类也能基于感知精度主观且定量地评估选择信心。然而,令人惊讶的是,人们对选择信心的了解却少之又少。在这里,我们通过融合决策的两个并行概念框架——信号检测理论和序列分析(即漂移扩散建模)来研究选择信心的动态变化。具体而言,为了捕捉二元选择和信心的终点统计数据,我们基于之前一项研究进行构建,该研究根据信号检测理论衍生的心理物理学来定义选择信心。同时,我们对这个数学模型进行了扩充,纳入漂移扩散模型的累加器动态变化,以描述在标准强制选择范式中选择行为的时间依赖性,在该范式中刺激持续时间由操作者控制。人类受试者执行了一项主观视觉垂直任务,同时报告二元方向选择和概率信心。二元选择和信心实验数据分别显示出与信号检测理论和证据积累相一致的统计数据和动态变化。具体来说,计算模拟表明,无界证据累加器模型比经典有界模型更能拟合信心数据,而对于二元选择数据,有界模型和无界模型无法区分。这些结果表明,大脑可以利用与信号检测理论一致的机制——尤其是在没有时间压力的情况下判断信心时。我们发现,对于强制选择主观视觉垂直任务,选择信心数据显示出与证据积累相一致的动态变化。我们还发现,在判断信心时证据积累似乎是无界的,这表明大脑利用与信号检测理论一致的机制来确定选择信心。