Clark Torin K, Yi Yongwoo, Galvan-Garza Raquel C, Bermúdez Rey María Carolina, Merfeld Daniel M
Jenks Vestibular Physiology Laboratory, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, Massachusetts.
Otology and Laryngology, Harvard Medical School , Boston, Massachusetts.
J Neurophysiol. 2018 Apr 1;119(4):1485-1496. doi: 10.1152/jn.00680.2017. Epub 2017 Dec 20.
When forced to choose humans often feel uncertain. Investigations of human perceptual decision-making often employ signal detection theory, which assumes that even when uncertain all available information is fully utilized. However, other studies have suggested or assumed that, when uncertain, human subjects guess totally at random, ignoring available information. When uncertain, do humans simply guess totally at random? Or do humans fully utilize complete information? Or does behavior fall between these two extremes yielding "above chance" performance without fully utilizing complete information? While it is often assumed complete information is fully utilized, even when uncertain, to our knowledge this has never been experimentally confirmed. To answer this question, we combined numerical simulations, theoretical analyses, and human studies performed using a self-motion direction-recognition perceptual decision-making task (did I rotate left or right?). Subjects were instructed to make forced-choice binary (left/right) and trinary (left/right/uncertain) decisions when cued following each stimulus. Our results show that humans 1) do not guess at random when uncertain and 2) make binary and trinary decisions equally well. These findings show that humans fully utilize complete information when uncertain for our perceptual decision-making task. This helps unify signal detection theory and other models of forced-choice decision-making which allow for uncertain responses. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Humans make many perceptual decisions every day. But what if we are uncertain? While many studies assume that humans fully utilize complete information, other studies have suggested and/or assumed that when we're uncertain and forced to decide, information is not fully utilized. While humans tend to perform above chance when uncertain, no earlier study has tested whether available information is fully utilized. Our results show that humans make fully informed decisions even when uncertain.
当被迫做出选择时,人类常常会感到不确定。对人类感知决策的研究通常采用信号检测理论,该理论假设即使在不确定的情况下,所有可用信息也会被充分利用。然而,其他研究表明或假设,当不确定时,人类受试者会完全随机猜测,忽略可用信息。当不确定时,人类是完全随机猜测吗?还是会充分利用完整信息?或者行为介于这两个极端之间,在没有充分利用完整信息的情况下产生“高于随机水平”的表现?虽然人们通常认为即使在不确定的情况下完整信息也会被充分利用,但据我们所知,这从未得到实验证实。为了回答这个问题,我们结合了数值模拟、理论分析以及使用自我运动方向识别感知决策任务(我是向左还是向右转?)进行的人类研究。受试者被指示在每次刺激后收到提示时做出强制选择的二元(左/右)和三元(左/右/不确定)决策。我们的结果表明,人类1)在不确定时不会随机猜测,并且2)做出二元和三元决策的表现同样好。这些发现表明,在我们的感知决策任务中,人类在不确定时会充分利用完整信息。这有助于统一信号检测理论和其他允许不确定反应的强制选择决策模型。新内容与值得注意之处人类每天都会做出许多感知决策。但如果我们不确定会怎样?虽然许多研究假设人类会充分利用完整信息,但其他研究表明和/或假设,当我们不确定并被迫做出决定时,信息并未得到充分利用。虽然人类在不确定时往往表现得高于随机水平,但之前没有研究测试过可用信息是否被充分利用。我们的结果表明,即使在不确定时,人类也会做出充分知情的决策。