Merfeld Daniel M, Clark Torin K, Lu Yue M, Karmali Faisal
Jenks Vestibular Physiology Lab, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Otology and Laryngology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; and
Jenks Vestibular Physiology Lab, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Otology and Laryngology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; and.
J Neurophysiol. 2016 Jan 1;115(1):39-59. doi: 10.1152/jn.00225.2015. Epub 2015 Oct 14.
Perceptual decision making is fundamental to a broad range of fields including neurophysiology, economics, medicine, advertising, law, etc. Although recent findings have yielded major advances in our understanding of perceptual decision making, decision making as a function of time and frequency (i.e., decision-making dynamics) is not well understood. To limit the review length, we focus most of this review on human findings. Animal findings, which are extensively reviewed elsewhere, are included when beneficial or necessary. We attempt to put these various findings and data sets, which can appear to be unrelated in the absence of a formal dynamic analysis, into context using published models. Specifically, by adding appropriate dynamic mechanisms (e.g., high-pass filters) to existing models, it appears that a number of otherwise seemingly disparate findings from the literature might be explained. One hypothesis that arises through this dynamic analysis is that decision making includes phasic (high pass) neural mechanisms, an evidence accumulator and/or some sort of midtrial decision-making mechanism (e.g., peak detector and/or decision boundary).
感知决策对于包括神经生理学、经济学、医学、广告、法律等广泛领域而言至关重要。尽管最近的研究结果在我们对感知决策的理解方面取得了重大进展,但作为时间和频率函数的决策(即决策动态)仍未得到充分理解。为了限制综述篇幅,本综述大部分内容聚焦于人类研究结果。在有益或必要时,会纳入在其他地方有详尽综述的动物研究结果。我们尝试使用已发表的模型,将这些在缺乏形式动态分析时看似不相关的各种研究结果和数据集置于相应背景中。具体而言,通过在现有模型中添加适当的动态机制(例如高通滤波器),文献中许多原本看似不同的研究结果似乎可以得到解释。通过这种动态分析得出的一个假设是,决策包括阶段性(高通)神经机制、证据积累器和/或某种试验中期决策机制(例如峰值检测器和/或决策边界)。