• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

C-MYC阳性复发难治性弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤:额外“打击”的影响及后续治疗结果

C-MYC-positive relapsed and refractory, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: Impact of additional "hits" and outcomes with subsequent therapy.

作者信息

Epperla Narendranath, Maddocks Kami J, Salhab Mohammed, Chavez Julio C, Reddy Nishitha, Karmali Reem, Umyarova Elvira, Bachanova Veronika, Costa Cristiana, Glenn Martha, Calzada Oscar, Xavier Ana C, Zhou Zheng, Hossain Nasheed M, Hernandez-Ilizaliturri Francisco J, Al-Mansour Zeina, Barta Stefan K, Chhabra Saurabh, Lansigan Frederick, Mehta Amitkumar, Jaglal Michael V, Evens Andrew M, Flowers Christopher R, Cohen Jonathon B, Fenske Timothy S, Hamadani Mehdi, Costa Luciano J

机构信息

Department of Hematology/Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

Department of Hematology, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.

出版信息

Cancer. 2017 Nov 15;123(22):4411-4418. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30895. Epub 2017 Jul 27.

DOI:10.1002/cncr.30895
PMID:28749548
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The impact of MYC proto-oncogene, basic helix-loop-helix (MYC) translocations (with or without additional rearrangements involving the B-cell lymphoma 2 [BCL2] or BCL6 genes) on the response to salvage therapy and survival in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who experience primary treatment failure is not well defined.

METHODS

This was a multicenter, retrospective study of the impact of MYC, BCL2, and BCL6 rearrangements in patients with DLBCL who failed to achieve complete remission or relapsed within 6 months after they completed upfront chemoimmunotherapy.

RESULTS

The authors examined response to salvage therapy, receipt of hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), and survival outcomes in MYC-negative (n = 120), MYC-positive single hit (SH) (n = 20), and MYC-positive double hit/triple hit (DH/TH) (n = 35) cohorts. The overall response rate in these cohorts to first salvage therapy (51%, 50%, and 54%, respectively) and receipt of HCT (52%, 40%, and 43%, respectively) were comparable between the 3 cohorts. The 2-year overall survival rate was 29.9% in the MYC-negative cohort, 0% in the MYC-positive SH cohort, and 9.9% in the MYC-positive DH/TH cohort (P < .001), and no difference was observed between the SH and DH/TH cohorts (P = .8). The higher risk of death for patients with MYC-positive SH DLBCL (hazard ratio, 1.70; 95% confidence interval, 0.98-2.96; P = .06) and those with MYC-positive DH/TH DLBCL (hazard ratio, 2.22; 95% confidence interval, 1.41-3.50; P = .001) persisted after adjusting for covariates. For patients who underwent autologous HCT, the 2-year overall survival rate was 55.4% in the MYC-negative cohort, 0% in the MYC-positive SH cohort, and 19.4% in the MYC-positive DH/TH cohort (P < .001). All 4 MYC-positive patients who underwent allogeneic HCT relapsed in <4 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with MYC-positive DLBCL who experience primary treatment failure have response rates to similar to those achieved by salvage therapy compared with their MYC-negative counterparts, but their survival is dismal irrespective of additional "hits" and HCT, representing an unmet medical need. Cancer 2017;123:4411-8. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

摘要

背景

MYC原癌基因、碱性螺旋-环-螺旋(MYC)易位(伴有或不伴有涉及B细胞淋巴瘤2 [BCL2]或BCL6基因的其他重排)对原发性治疗失败的弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)患者挽救治疗反应及生存的影响尚不明确。

方法

这是一项多中心回顾性研究,旨在探讨MYC、BCL2和BCL6重排在完成初始化疗免疫治疗后6个月内未达到完全缓解或复发的DLBCL患者中的影响。

结果

作者研究了MYC阴性(n = 120)、MYC阳性单打击(SH)(n = 20)和MYC阳性双打击/三打击(DH/TH)(n = 35)队列中患者对挽救治疗的反应、造血细胞移植(HCT)的接受情况及生存结局。这3个队列对首次挽救治疗的总体反应率(分别为51%、50%和54%)及接受HCT的比例(分别为52%、40%和43%)相当。MYC阴性队列的2年总生存率为29.9%,MYC阳性SH队列的为0%,MYC阳性DH/TH队列的为9.9%(P <.001),SH队列和DH/TH队列之间未观察到差异(P =.8)。校正协变量后,MYC阳性SH DLBCL患者(风险比,1.70;95%置信区间,0.98 - 2.96;P =.06)和MYC阳性DH/TH DLBCL患者(风险比,2.22;95%置信区间,1.41 - 3.50;P =.001)的死亡风险仍然较高。对于接受自体HCT的患者,MYC阴性队列的2年总生存率为55.4%,MYC阳性SH队列的为0%,MYC阳性DH/TH队列的为19.4%(P <.001)。所有4例接受异基因HCT的MYC阳性患者均在4个月内复发。

结论

原发性治疗失败的MYC阳性DLBCL患者与MYC阴性患者相比,对挽救治疗的反应率相似,但无论是否有其他“打击”及接受HCT,其生存情况都很差,这代表了一种未满足的医疗需求。《癌症》2017年;123:4411 - 8。©2017美国癌症协会。

相似文献

1
C-MYC-positive relapsed and refractory, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: Impact of additional "hits" and outcomes with subsequent therapy.C-MYC阳性复发难治性弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤:额外“打击”的影响及后续治疗结果
Cancer. 2017 Nov 15;123(22):4411-4418. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30895. Epub 2017 Jul 27.
2
MYC single-hit large B-cell lymphoma: clinicopathologic difference from MYC-negative large B-cell lymphoma and MYC double-hit/triple-hit lymphoma.MYC单打击大B细胞淋巴瘤:与MYC阴性大B细胞淋巴瘤及MYC双打击/三打击淋巴瘤的临床病理差异
Hum Pathol. 2021 Jul;113:9-19. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2021.03.006. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
3
Double-Hit Gene Expression Signature Defines a Distinct Subgroup of Germinal Center B-Cell-Like Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.双打击基因表达特征定义了生发中心 B 细胞样弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤的一个独特亚群。
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Jan 20;37(3):190-201. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.01583. Epub 2018 Dec 3.
4
[Survival of patients with primary central nervous system diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: impact of gene aberrations and protein overexpression of bcl-2 and C-MYC, and selection of chemotherapy regimens].[原发性中枢神经系统弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤患者的生存:bcl-2和C-MYC基因畸变及蛋白过表达的影响以及化疗方案的选择]
Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi. 2018 Jan 8;47(1):32-38. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5807.2018.01.007.
5
Double expressor and double/triple hit status among primary cutaneous diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a comparison between leg type and not otherwise specified subtypes.原发性皮肤弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤中的双表达和双/三打击状态:腿型与非特指亚型的比较。
Hum Pathol. 2021 May;111:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2021.01.006. Epub 2021 Feb 3.
6
Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma having 8q24/MYC rearrangement in Japan.日本弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤伴 8q24/MYC 重排患者的造血干细胞移植。
Hematol Oncol. 2021 Feb;39(1):66-74. doi: 10.1002/hon.2811. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
7
Ofatumumab, Etoposide, and Cytarabine Intensive Mobilization Regimen in Patients with High-risk Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Undergoing Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation.奥法妥木单抗、依托泊苷和阿糖胞苷强化动员方案在接受自体造血干细胞移植的高危复发/难治性弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤患者中的应用。
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2021 Apr;21(4):246-256.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2020.11.005. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
8
Patients with double/triple copy number gains on C-MYC, BCL2, and/or BCL6 treated with standard chemotherapy have a similarly poor prognosis than those with high-grade B cell lymphoma with C-MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 rearrangements: a single-center experience on a consecutive cohort of large B cell lymphomas.对于接受标准化疗的 C-MYC、BCL2 和/或 BCL6 双重/三重拷贝数增益的患者,其预后与具有 C-MYC 和 BCL2 和/或 BCL6 重排的高级别 B 细胞淋巴瘤患者相似:一项关于连续大 B 细胞淋巴瘤队列的单中心经验。
Ann Hematol. 2020 Sep;99(9):2125-2132. doi: 10.1007/s00277-020-04124-0. Epub 2020 Jul 1.
9
MYC+ diffuse large B-cell lymphoma is not salvaged by classical R-ICE or R-DHAP followed by BEAM plus autologous stem cell transplantation.MYC 阳性弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤经经典 R-ICE 或 R-DHAP 挽救治疗后序贯 BEAM 方案并自体造血干细胞移植治疗无效。
Blood. 2012 May 17;119(20):4619-24. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-01-406033. Epub 2012 Mar 9.
10
Double-hit BCL2/MYC translocations in a consecutive cohort of patients with large B-cell lymphoma - a single centre's experience.双打击 BCL2/MYC 易位在连续队列的弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤患者中的研究——单中心经验。
Eur J Haematol. 2012 Jul;89(1):63-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0609.2012.01787.x. Epub 2012 Apr 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Autologous Transplant or CAR-T as Consolidation Options in MYC Rearranged Large B-Cell Lymphoma Patients in Remission After Salvage Treatments.自体移植或CAR-T作为挽救治疗后缓解的MYC重排大B细胞淋巴瘤患者巩固治疗的选择
Am J Hematol. 2025 Jul;100(7):1152-1162. doi: 10.1002/ajh.27687. Epub 2025 Apr 15.
2
Age- and gender-specific molecular characteristics of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: Results from clinical trials of the DSHNHL/GLA.弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤的年龄和性别特异性分子特征:来自DSHNHL/GLA临床试验的结果
Hemasphere. 2025 Mar 7;9(3):e70093. doi: 10.1002/hem3.70093. eCollection 2025 Mar.
3
Molecular Features of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Associated With Primary Treatment Resistance.
弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤与原发性治疗抵抗相关的分子特征。
Hematol Oncol. 2025 Jan;43(1):e70006. doi: 10.1002/hon.70006.
4
Ki67 Immunohistochemical Expression Level ≥70%, Bulky Presentation ≥7.5 cm, Meningeal Lymphomatosis, and Interim PET ΔSUVmax After 4 Treatment Cycles <71% as Parts of a Practical Scoring System to Predict Progression-Free Survival and Overall Survival in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.作为预测弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤无进展生存期和总生存期的实用评分系统的组成部分,Ki67免疫组化表达水平≥70%、肿块较大(≥7.5 cm)、脑膜淋巴瘤病以及4个治疗周期后的中期PET ΔSUVmax<71% 。
Front Nucl Med. 2022 Apr 7;2:829138. doi: 10.3389/fnume.2022.829138. eCollection 2022.
5
Sequencing of cellular therapy and bispecific antibodies for the management of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.细胞治疗和双特异性抗体在弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤治疗中的应用测序。
Haematologica. 2024 Oct 1;109(10):3138-3145. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2024.285255.
6
Physical Activity Program for the Survival of Elderly Patients With Lymphoma: Study Protocol for Randomized Phase 3 Trial.老年淋巴瘤患者生存体力活动计划:一项随机3期试验的研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Nov 25;11(11):e40969. doi: 10.2196/40969.
7
Novel Immune-Based treatments for Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: The Post-CAR T Cell Era.新型免疫治疗弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤:CAR-T 细胞治疗后时代。
Front Immunol. 2022 Jun 1;13:901365. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.901365. eCollection 2022.
8
Immunotherapies Old and New: Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant, Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells, and Bispecific Antibodies for the Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma.新旧免疫疗法:造血干细胞移植、嵌合抗原受体 T 细胞和双特异性抗体治疗复发/难治性弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤。
Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2021 Feb;16(1):72-81. doi: 10.1007/s11899-021-00610-y. Epub 2021 Feb 22.
9
Molecular Genetics of Relapsed Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Insight into Mechanisms of Therapy Resistance.复发性弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤的分子遗传学:对治疗耐药机制的洞察
Cancers (Basel). 2020 Nov 28;12(12):3553. doi: 10.3390/cancers12123553.
10
Is autologous transplant in relapsed DLBCL patients achieving only a PET+ PR appropriate in the CAR T-cell era?在 CAR T 细胞治疗时代,对于达到仅 PET+PR 的缓解的复发弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤患者,进行自体移植是否合适?
Blood. 2021 Mar 11;137(10):1416-1423. doi: 10.1182/blood.2020007939.