Suppr超能文献

奥法妥木单抗、依托泊苷和阿糖胞苷强化动员方案在接受自体造血干细胞移植的高危复发/难治性弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤患者中的应用。

Ofatumumab, Etoposide, and Cytarabine Intensive Mobilization Regimen in Patients with High-risk Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Undergoing Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation.

机构信息

Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, UCSF Medical Center, San Francisco, CA; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, UCSF Medical Center, San Francisco, CA.

Department of Hematology, Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, UT.

出版信息

Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2021 Apr;21(4):246-256.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2020.11.005. Epub 2020 Nov 11.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

More than one-half of high-risk patients with relapsed/refractory (rr) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) relapse after autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (auto-HCT). In this phase II study, we investigate the long-term outcomes of high-risk patients with rrDLBCL receiving intensive consolidation therapy (ICT) with OVA (ofatumumab, etoposide, and high-dose cytarabine) prior to auto-HCT.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The primary endpoints were the ability of OVA to mobilize peripheral stem cells and the 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate following OVA. Secondary endpoints included safety, 2-year overall survival (OS), impact of cell of origin (COO), and the prognostic utility of next-generation sequencing minimal residual disease (MRD) testing. We simultaneously retrospectively assessed the outcomes of DLBCL patients who underwent ICT with a similar regimen at our institution.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients received salvage chemotherapy, with a response rate of 25% in patients with germinal center B-cell (GCB)-DLBCL versus 92% in patients with non-GCB-DLBCL (P = .003). Nineteen responding patients underwent ICT with OVA (100% successful stem cell mobilization). The 2-year PFS and OS rate was 47% and 59%, respectively, with no difference based on COO. Similar findings were observed when the study and retrospective cohorts were combined. Neutropenia was the most common toxicity (47%). MRD-negative patients at the completion of salvage had a median OS of not reached versus 3.5 months in MRD-positive patients (P = .02).

CONCLUSIONS

OVA followed by auto-HCT is effective and safe for high-risk rrDLBCL. Patients with GCB-DLBCL had a lower response to salvage chemotherapy, but no difference in outcomes based on COO was seen after auto-HCT. MRD testing in the relapsed setting was predictive of long-term survival.

摘要

背景

超过一半的复发/难治性(rr)弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)高危患者在自体造血细胞移植(auto-HCT)后复发。在这项 II 期研究中,我们研究了在接受 auto-HCT 之前接受强化巩固治疗(ICT)的 rrDLBCL 高危患者接受 OVA(奥法妥珠单抗、依托泊苷和高剂量阿糖胞苷)的长期结果。

患者和方法

主要终点是 OVA 动员外周干细胞的能力和 OVA 后的 2 年无进展生存(PFS)率。次要终点包括安全性、2 年总生存(OS)、细胞起源(COO)的影响以及下一代测序微小残留病(MRD)检测的预后价值。我们同时回顾性评估了我们机构接受类似方案 ICT 的 DLBCL 患者的结果。

结果

27 例患者接受了挽救性化疗,在生发中心 B 细胞(GCB)-DLBCL 患者中,缓解率为 25%,而非 GCB-DLBCL 患者中为 92%(P =.003)。19 例反应患者接受了 OVA 的 ICT(100%成功动员干细胞)。2 年 PFS 和 OS 率分别为 47%和 59%,与 COO 无关。当研究和回顾性队列合并时,观察到了类似的发现。中性粒细胞减少是最常见的毒性(47%)。在完成挽救性治疗时 MRD 阴性患者的中位 OS 未达到,而 MRD 阳性患者的中位 OS 为 3.5 个月(P =.02)。

结论

OVA 继之以 auto-HCT 对高危 rrDLBCL 是有效且安全的。GCB-DLBCL 患者对挽救性化疗的反应较低,但在接受 auto-HCT 后,根据 COO 未见结果差异。在复发环境中进行的 MRD 检测可预测长期生存。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验