Dalakas Marinos C, Rakocevic Goran, Dambrosia James M, Alexopoulos Harry, McElroy Beverly
Department of Neurology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.
Neuroimmunology Unit, Department of Pathophysiology, Faculty of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Ann Neurol. 2017 Aug;82(2):271-277. doi: 10.1002/ana.25002. Epub 2017 Aug 9.
In stiff person syndrome (SPS), an antibody-mediated impaired γ-aminobutyric acidergic (GABAergic) neurotransmission is believed to cause muscle stiffness and spasms. Most patients improve with GABA-enhancing drugs and intravenous immunoglobulin, but some respond poorly and remain disabled. The need for more effective therapy prompted a trial with the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab.
This was a placebo-controlled randomized trial of rituximab (2 biweekly infusions of 1g each). The primary outcome was a change in stiffness scores at 6 months. Secondary outcomes were changes in heightened-sensitivity and quality of life scores. Enrolling 24 patients was calculated to detect 50% change in stiffness scores.
Randomization was balanced for age, sex, disease duration, and glutamic acid decarboxylase autoantibody titers. No significant changes were noted at 6 months after treatment in all outcomes. Specifically, no differences were noted in the stiffness index, the primary outcome, or sensitivity scores, the secondary outcome, at 3 or 6 months. Quality of life scores improved significantly (p < 0.01) at 3 months in both groups, but not at 6 months, denoting an early placebo effect. Blinded self-assessment rating of the overall stiffness for individual patients revealed improvement in 4 patients in each group. At 6 months, improvement persisted in 1 patient in the placebo group versus 3 of 4 in the rituximab group, where these meaningful improvements were also captured by video recordings.
This is the largest controlled trial conducted in SPS patients and demonstrates no statistically significant difference in the efficacy measures between rituximab and placebo. Rituximab's lack of efficacy could be due to a considerable placebo effect; insensitivity of scales to quantify stiffness, especially in the less severely affected patients; or drug effectiveness in only a small patient subset. Ann Neurol 2017;82:271-277.
在僵人综合征(SPS)中,抗体介导的γ-氨基丁酸能(GABA能)神经传递受损被认为会导致肌肉僵硬和痉挛。大多数患者使用增强GABA的药物和静脉注射免疫球蛋白后病情改善,但有些患者反应不佳,仍有残疾。对更有效治疗方法的需求促使开展了一项使用抗CD20单克隆抗体利妥昔单抗的试验性研究。
这是一项利妥昔单抗(每2周静脉输注1g,共2次)的安慰剂对照随机试验。主要结局是6个月时僵硬评分的变化。次要结局是高敏性和生活质量评分的变化。计算得出纳入24例患者可检测到僵硬评分有50%的变化。
随机分组在年龄、性别、病程和谷氨酸脱羧酶自身抗体滴度方面是均衡的。治疗6个月后,所有结局均未观察到显著变化。具体而言,在3个月或6个月时,僵硬指数(主要结局)或高敏性评分(次要结局)均未观察到差异。两组在3个月时生活质量评分均显著改善(p < 0.01),但在6个月时未改善,表明存在早期安慰剂效应。对个体患者整体僵硬程度的盲法自我评估显示,每组有4例患者有改善。在6个月时,安慰剂组有1例患者持续改善,而利妥昔单抗组4例中有3例持续改善,视频记录也捕捉到了这些有意义的改善。
这是在SPS患者中进行的最大规模对照试验,结果显示利妥昔单抗和安慰剂在疗效指标上无统计学显著差异。利妥昔单抗缺乏疗效可能是由于显著的安慰剂效应;量表对僵硬程度量化不敏感,尤其是在病情较轻的患者中;或者仅在一小部分患者亚组中药物有效。《神经病学纪事》2017年;82卷:271 - 277页