多菌型麻风病患者的心率变异性:线性与非线性分析

Heart rate variability in multibacillar leprosy: Linear and nonlinear analysis.

作者信息

Santos Marcio Clementino de Souza, Silveira Luiz Carlos de Lima, Moura-Tonello Sílvia Cristina Garcia, Porta Alberto, Catai Aparecida Maria, Souza Givago da Silva

机构信息

Pará State University, Center for Biological Sciences and Health, Belem, Pará, Brazil.

Federal University of Pará, Tropical Medicine Nucleus, Belem, Pará, Brazil.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2017 Jul 27;12(7):e0180677. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180677. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the heart rate variability (HRV) in patients with multibacillary leprosy using dynamic linear and nonlinear analysis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Twenty-one leprosy patients (mean age: 39.14 ±10.58 years) and 21 healthy subjects (mean age: 36.24 ± 12.64 years) completed the sample. Heart rate variability recording was performed by a Polar RS800 CX heart monitor during a period of 15 min in the supine position and 15 min in a sitting position. Analysis of HRV was performed by frequency domain from high frequency (HF) and low frequency (LF) spectral indexes in absolute and normalized units. The nonlinear analysis of HRV was calculated using symbolic analysis (0V%, 1V%, 2LV% and 2UV% indexes), Shannon entropy (SE) and normalized complexity index (NCI).

RESULTS

Linear analysis: both groups showed higher HF values (p < 0.05) and smaller LF values (p < 0.05) in supine than in sitting position. The leprosy patients showed higher LF values (p < 0.05) and smaller HF values (p < 0.05) compared to the controls on supine position. Symbolic analysis: leprosy patients had higher 0V% values (p < 0.05), smaller 2LV% values (p < 0.05) and 2UV % values compared to healthy subjects on both positions. The 1V % had higher values (p < 0.05) for leprosy patients than for controls in the sitting position. The control subjects had smaller 0V % values (p < 0.05), and higher 2UV % values (p < 0.05) in the supine position compared to the sitting position. Leprosy patients had higher 2UV index values (p < 0.05) in the supine position compared to the sitting position. In the complexity analysis, leprosy patients had smaller SE and NCI values (p < 0.05) than the control in the supine position. There was no difference between the SE and NCI values of leprosy and the control subjects in the sitting position. The control subjects had higher SE and NCI values (p < 0.05) in the supine position than in the sitting position.

CONCLUSION

Leprosy patients had higher sympathetic modulation and smaller vagal modulation than controls, indicating less HRV and cardiac modulation with lower complexity. The control group displayed significant HRV differences in response to position changes while leprosy patients had fewer HRV differences after the same postural change. An analysis of HRV with linear and non-linear dynamics proved to be a reliable method and promising for the investigation of autonomic dysfunction in patients with multibacillary leprosy.

摘要

目的

采用动态线性和非线性分析方法评估多菌型麻风患者的心率变异性(HRV)。

材料与方法

纳入21例麻风患者(平均年龄:39.14±10.58岁)和21名健康受试者(平均年龄:36.24±12.64岁)作为研究样本。使用Polar RS800 CX心率监测仪在仰卧位15分钟和坐位15分钟期间记录心率变异性。通过频域分析高频(HF)和低频(LF)频谱指标的绝对值和标准化单位来分析HRV。使用符号分析(0V%、1V%、2LV%和2UV%指标)、香农熵(SE)和标准化复杂度指数(NCI)计算HRV的非线性分析。

结果

线性分析:两组在仰卧位时的HF值均高于坐位(p<0.05),LF值均小于坐位(p<0.05)。与对照组相比,麻风患者在仰卧位时的LF值更高(p<0.05),HF值更小(p<0.05)。符号分析:在两个体位下,麻风患者的0V%值均高于健康受试者(p<0.05),2LV%值和2UV%值均小于健康受试者(p<0.05)。在坐位时,麻风患者的1V%值高于对照组(p<0.05)。与坐位相比,对照组在仰卧位时的0V%值更小(p<0.05),2UV%值更高(p<0.05)。与坐位相比,麻风患者在仰卧位时的2UV指数值更高(p<0.05)。在复杂度分析中,麻风患者在仰卧位时的SE和NCI值小于对照组(p<0.05)。在坐位时,麻风患者和对照组的SE和NCI值无差异。与坐位相比,对照组在仰卧位时的SE和NCI值更高(p<0.05)。

结论

与对照组相比,麻风患者的交感神经调节更高,迷走神经调节更小,表明HRV和心脏调节更低且复杂度更低。对照组在体位改变时显示出显著的HRV差异,而麻风患者在相同体位改变后的HRV差异较小。线性和非线性动力学分析HRV被证明是一种可靠的方法,有望用于研究多菌型麻风患者的自主神经功能障碍。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27b3/5531509/d96899faad3c/pone.0180677.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索