Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, Instituto Biosanitario de Salamanca (IBSAL), Spain.
St. István, St. László Hospital, 3 Department of Internal Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Haematologica. 2017 Oct;102(10):1767-1775. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2017.170118. Epub 2017 Jul 27.
Prior treatment exposure in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma may affect outcomes with subsequent therapies. We analyzed efficacy and safety according to prior treatment in the phase 3 TOURMALINE-MM1 study of ixazomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (ixazomib-Rd) placebo-Rd. Patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma received ixazomib-Rd or placebo-Rd. Efficacy and safety were evaluated in subgroups defined according to type (proteasome inhibitor [PI] and immunomodulatory drug) and number (1 2 or 3) of prior therapies received. Of 722 patients, 503 (70%) had received a prior PI, and 397 (55%) prior lenalidomide/thalidomide; 425 patients had received 1 prior therapy, and 297 received 2 or 3 prior therapies. At a median follow up of ~15 months, PFS was prolonged with ixazomib-Rd placebo-Rd regardless of type of prior therapy received; HR 0.739 and 0.749 in PI-exposed and -naïve patients, HR 0.744 and 0.700 in immunomodulatory-drug-exposed and -naïve patients, respectively. PFS benefit with ixazomib-Rd placebo-Rd appeared greater in patients with 2 or 3 prior therapies (HR 0.58) and in those with 1 prior therapy without prior transplant (HR 0.60) those with 1 prior therapy and transplant (HR 1.23). Across all subgroups, toxicity was consistent with that seen in the intent-to-treat population. In patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, ixazomib-Rd was associated with a consistent clinical benefit placebo-Rd regardless of prior treatment with bortezomib or immunomodulatory drugs. Patients with 2 or 3 prior therapies, or 1 prior therapy without transplant seemed to have greater benefit than patients with 1 prior therapy and transplant. TOURMALINE-MM1 registered at
先前治疗方案的暴露情况可能会影响复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤患者接受后续治疗的结局。我们分析了在来那度胺-硼替佐米-地塞米松(来那度胺-Rd)联合安慰剂-Rd 的 III 期 TOURMALINE-MM1 研究中,根据先前治疗情况的疗效和安全性。复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤患者接受来那度胺-Rd 或安慰剂-Rd。根据先前接受的治疗方案的类型(蛋白酶体抑制剂[PI]和免疫调节药物)和数量(1、2 或 3),将患者分为亚组,评估疗效和安全性。722 例患者中,503 例(70%)接受过 PI 治疗,397 例(55%)接受过来那度胺/沙利度胺治疗;425 例患者接受过 1 种治疗,297 例患者接受过 2 种或 3 种治疗。在中位随访时间约 15 个月时,无论先前接受何种治疗方案,来那度胺-Rd 均能延长 PFS;PI 暴露和未暴露患者的 HR 分别为 0.739 和 0.749,免疫调节药物暴露和未暴露患者的 HR 分别为 0.744 和 0.700。在接受过 2 种或 3 种治疗的患者(HR 0.58)和接受过 1 种治疗但未接受过移植的患者(HR 0.60)中,来那度胺-Rd 与安慰剂-Rd 相比,PFS 获益更大,而在接受过 1 种治疗且接受过移植的患者(HR 1.23)中,来那度胺-Rd 与安慰剂-Rd 相比,PFS 获益更小。在所有亚组中,毒性与意向治疗人群一致。在复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤患者中,来那度胺-Rd 与安慰剂-Rd 相比,无论先前是否接受硼替佐米或免疫调节药物治疗,均能带来一致的临床获益。与接受过 1 种治疗且接受过移植的患者相比,接受过 2 种或 3 种治疗的患者或接受过 1 种治疗但未接受过移植的患者似乎获益更大。TOURMALINE-MM1 于