Hernández-Rivas José-Ángel, Ríos-Tamayo Rafael, Encinas Cristina, Alonso Rafael, Lahuerta Juan-José
Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor, Departamento de Medicina, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain.
Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria, Granada, Spain.
Biomark Res. 2022 Jan 9;10(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s40364-021-00344-2.
The increase in the number of therapeutic alternatives for both newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) patients has widened the clinical scenario, leading to a level of complexity that no algorithm has been able to cover up to date. At present, this complexity increases due to the wide variety of clinical situations found in MM patients before they reach the status of relapsed/refractory disease. These different backgrounds may include primary refractoriness, early relapse after completion of first-line therapy with latest-generation agents, or very late relapse after chemotherapy or autologous transplantation. It is also important to bear in mind that many patient profiles are not fully represented in the main randomized clinical trials (RCT), and this further complicates treatment decision-making. In RRMM patients, the choice of previously unused drugs and the number and duration of previous therapeutic regimens until progression has a greater impact on treatment efficacy than the adverse biological characteristics of MM itself. In addition to proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory drugs, anti-CD38 antibodies and corticosteroids, a new generation of drugs such as XPO inhibitors, BCL-2 inhibitors, new alkylators and, above all, immunotherapy based on conjugated anti-BCMA antibodies and CAR-T cells, have been developed to fight RRMM. This comprehensive review addresses the fundamentals and controversies regarding RRMM, and discusses the main aspects of management and treatment. The basis for the clinical management of RRMM (complexity of clinical scenarios, key factors to consider before choosing an appropriate treatment, or when to treat), the arsenal of new drugs with no cross resistance with previously administered standard first line regimens (main phase 3 clinical trials), the future outlook including the usefulness of abandoned resources, together with the controversies surrounding the clinical management of RRMM patients will be reviewed in detail.
新诊断和复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤(RRMM)患者的治疗选择增多,拓宽了临床局面,导致了一种目前尚无算法能够涵盖的复杂程度。目前,由于MM患者在进入复发/难治性疾病状态之前存在各种各样的临床情况,这种复杂性进一步增加。这些不同的背景可能包括原发性难治性、使用最新一代药物完成一线治疗后的早期复发,或化疗或自体移植后的非常晚期复发。同样重要的是要记住,许多患者特征在主要的随机临床试验(RCT)中并未得到充分体现,这进一步使治疗决策复杂化。在RRMM患者中,选择先前未使用过的药物以及直至疾病进展的先前治疗方案的数量和持续时间,对治疗疗效的影响大于MM本身的不良生物学特征。除了蛋白酶体抑制剂、免疫调节药物、抗CD38抗体和皮质类固醇外,还开发了新一代药物,如XPO抑制剂、BCL-2抑制剂、新型烷化剂,尤其是基于偶联抗BCMA抗体和CAR-T细胞的免疫疗法,用于对抗RRMM。本综述阐述了RRMM的基本原理和争议,并讨论了管理和治疗的主要方面。将详细回顾RRMM临床管理的基础(临床情况的复杂性、选择合适治疗前或何时治疗时需考虑的关键因素)、与先前使用的标准一线方案无交叉耐药性的新药库(主要的3期临床试验)、包括废弃资源的有用性在内的未来展望,以及围绕RRMM患者临床管理的争议。