School of Medicine, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.
Illawarra Health and Medical Research Institute, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2018 Apr;27(2):631-641. doi: 10.1111/inm.12346. Epub 2017 Jul 28.
The ventrogluteal site is increasingly recommended for long-acting antipsychotic intramuscular injections; however, it remains infrequently utilized due to nurses' lack of confidence in site identification. The more recent G (geometric) method of ventrogluteal site identification is less subjective and likely more reliable than the V method for successful intramuscular injection outcomes. Knowledge of muscle and subcutaneous fat thicknesses, and the influence of sex and anthropometry on theoretical injection outcome, is necessary to support evidence-based use of the ventrogluteal site. In the presents study, we compared the V and G methods for injection site subcutaneous fat, muscle, and total tissue thicknesses, and theoretical injection outcome (bone injury, intramuscular or subcutaneous), and determined anthropometric predictors of injection outcome. Subcutaneous fat and muscle thicknesses were measured via ultrasound, bilaterally at V and G method sites (28 males, 32 females). Muscle and total tissue were significantly thicker, and successful intramuscular injection significantly more likely, using the G versus V method (75% versus 57%). Females had significantly thicker subcutaneous fat than males at both sites. Even using the G method, 92% of males but only 59% of females, would have a successful intramuscular injection, with remaining females at risk of bone injury (16%) or subcutaneous injection (25%). The G method site is more reliable for successful intramuscular injection, with less risk of bone injury than the V method site. Appropriate needle-length selection is essential for females with a body mass index (BMI) <23 kg m and weight <60 kg (to avoid bone injury), and BMI >30 kg m and hip >90 cm (to avoid subcutaneous injection).
臀肌外侧部位越来越被推荐用于长效抗精神病药物的肌肉注射;然而,由于护士对该部位的识别缺乏信心,该部位的使用率仍然很低。最近提出的臀肌外侧部位定位的 G(几何)法比 V 法更客观,也更有可能获得成功的肌肉注射效果。了解肌肉和皮下脂肪的厚度,以及性别和人体测量学对理论注射结果的影响,对于支持基于证据的臀肌外侧部位的使用是必要的。在本研究中,我们比较了 V 法和 G 法在注射部位的皮下脂肪、肌肉和总组织厚度以及理论注射结果(骨损伤、肌肉内或皮下)方面的差异,并确定了影响注射结果的人体测量学预测因子。使用超声,双侧在 V 法和 G 法部位测量了 28 名男性和 32 名女性的皮下脂肪和肌肉厚度。G 法与 V 法相比,肌肉和总组织明显更厚,肌肉内注射成功的可能性更大(75%对 57%)。女性在两个部位的皮下脂肪厚度均显著大于男性。即使使用 G 法,92%的男性也会有成功的肌肉内注射,而只有 59%的女性,有骨损伤(16%)或皮下注射(25%)的风险。G 法部位比 V 法部位更可靠,肌肉内注射成功的风险更低,且骨损伤的风险也更低。对于 BMI<23kg/m 和体重<60kg(以避免骨损伤)的女性,以及 BMI>30kg/m 和臀部>90cm(以避免皮下注射)的女性,选择合适的针头长度至关重要。