Meneses G, Gevorkian G, Florentino A, Bautista M A, Espinosa A, Acero G, Díaz G, Fleury A, Pérez Osorio I N, Del Rey A, Fragoso G, Sciutto E, Besedovsky H
Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México, D.F., México.
Unidad Periférica del Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas en el Instituto Nacional de Neurología y Neurocirugía, México, D.F., México.
Clin Exp Immunol. 2017 Dec;190(3):304-314. doi: 10.1111/cei.13018. Epub 2017 Sep 7.
Neuroinflammation is the hallmark of several infectious and neurodegenerative diseases. Synthetic glucocorticoids (GCs) are the first-line immunosuppressive drugs used for controlling neuroinflammation. A delayed diffusion of GCs molecules and the high systemic doses required for brain-specific targeting lead to severe undesirable effects, particularly when lifelong treatment is required. Therefore, there is an urgent need for improving this current therapeutic approach. The intranasal (i.n.) route is being employed increasingly for drug delivery to the brain via the olfactory system. In this study, the i.n. route is compared to the intravenous (i.v.) administration of GCs with respect to their effectiveness in controlling neuroinflammation induced experimentally by systemic lipopolysaccharide (LPS) injection. A statistically significant reduction in interleukin (IL)-6 levels in the central nervous system (CNS) in the percentage of CD45 /CD11b /lymphocyte antigen 6 complex locus G6D [Ly6G and in glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) immunostaining was observed in mice from the i.n.-dexamethasone (DX] group compared to control and i.v.-DX-treated animals. DX treatment did not modify the percentage of microglia and perivascular macrophages as determined by ionized calcium binding adaptor molecule 1 (Iba1) immunostaining of the cortex and hippocampus. The increased accumulation of DX in brain microvasculature in DX-i.n.-treated mice compared with controls and DX-IV-treated animals may underlie the higher effectiveness in controlling neuroinflammation. Altogether, these results indicate that IN-DX administration may offer a more efficient alternative than systemic administration to control neuroinflammation in different neuropathologies.
神经炎症是多种感染性和神经退行性疾病的标志。合成糖皮质激素(GCs)是用于控制神经炎症的一线免疫抑制药物。GCs分子的扩散延迟以及脑特异性靶向所需的高全身剂量会导致严重的不良影响,尤其是在需要终身治疗时。因此,迫切需要改进当前的治疗方法。鼻内(i.n.)途径越来越多地用于通过嗅觉系统将药物递送至大脑。在本研究中,将i.n.途径与静脉内(i.v.)给予GCs在控制由全身注射脂多糖(LPS)实验性诱导的神经炎症方面的有效性进行了比较。与对照组和静脉注射地塞米松(DX)治疗的动物相比,在鼻内地塞米松(DX)组的小鼠中观察到中枢神经系统(CNS)中白细胞介素(IL)-6水平、CD45 / CD11b /淋巴细胞抗原6复合体基因座G6D [Ly6G]百分比以及胶质纤维酸性蛋白(GFAP)免疫染色有统计学意义的降低。通过对皮质和海马进行离子钙结合衔接分子1(Iba1)免疫染色确定,DX治疗并未改变小胶质细胞和血管周围巨噬细胞的百分比。与对照组和静脉注射DX治疗的动物相比,鼻内地塞米松治疗的小鼠脑微血管中DX的积累增加,这可能是其在控制神经炎症方面更高有效性的基础。总之,这些结果表明,鼻内地塞米松给药可能比全身给药提供一种更有效的替代方法来控制不同神经病理学中的神经炎症。