a Department of Emergency Medicine , University of New Mexico Hospital , Albuquerque , NM , USA.
b New Mexico Poison and Drug Information Center , Albuquerque , NM , USA.
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2018 Mar;56(3):175-181. doi: 10.1080/15563650.2017.1355056. Epub 2017 Jul 28.
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: The use of levetiracetam (LEV) in the management of drug-induced seizures has not been systematically investigated. Repetitive and continuous seizures that do not respond to benzodiazepines require second line therapy. Levetiracetam has a unique receptor binding site, rapid absorption, no known cardiac effects at therapeutic doses, and is theoretically a good candidate for use in drug-induced seizures. We evaluate the safety of LEV and its association with seizure cessation in this retrospective chart review of patients who received LEV as a control agent in drug-induced seizures.
We identified the medical records of patients presenting to an urban, level 1 trauma center between 1 January 2010 and 31 May 2015 by ICD-9 codes based on the following: (1) a poisoning diagnosis, (2) a seizure diagnosis, and (3) administration of LEV. We included patients with a drug-induced seizure based on history, electroencephalogram results, blood alcohol concentrations, urine drug screens, and adequate documentation. We excluded patients with alcohol withdrawal, anoxic brain injury, subtherapeutic concentrations of other antiepileptics, hypoglycemia, and pseudoseizures. Primary outcomes of interest included cessation of active seizures or the prevention of seizure recurrence. We assessed safety by the presence or absence of adverse drug effects (ADE) attributed to the administration of LEV.
Thirty-four patients met inclusion and exclusion criteria. Half of the study cohort (17) presented with generalized tonic-clonic seizures (TCS); half (17) presented in generalized convulsive status epilepticus (GCSE). Six patients in GCSE received LEV during their seizures; 2 also received fosphenytoin. One improved immediately following LEV administration, and the remaining 5 had seizure control. Eleven GCSE patients (65%) remained seizure free after LEV therapy. The patients with TCS (17) received LEV after seizure(s) control. Sixteen (94%) were seizure-free during their hospital course. We found no adverse drug effects. In total, 27 of 34 patients (79%) had a return to baseline neurological and physical health. Six had long-term sequelae; none of which are known LEV side-effects. We identified 46 toxic substances and 22 known seizurogenic agents (48%). The median length of stay was 3.7 days (0.4-96), and the median duration of in-hospital LEV therapy was 1.6 days (0-49).
Levetiracetam used as a second-line agent was associated with control of drug-induced seizures and prevention of seizure recurrence without obvious adverse effects. A prospective study is needed to confirm these results.
背景/目的:左乙拉西坦(LEV)在药物诱发癫痫的治疗中的应用尚未得到系统研究。对苯二氮䓬类药物无反应的反复和持续癫痫需要二线治疗。LEV 具有独特的受体结合部位,吸收迅速,在治疗剂量下无已知的心脏作用,理论上是治疗药物诱导性癫痫的理想候选药物。我们通过回顾性病历分析评估 LEV 的安全性及其在药物诱导性癫痫患者中作为控制药物时与癫痫发作停止的相关性。
我们根据以下 ICD-9 编码确定了 2010 年 1 月 1 日至 2015 年 5 月 31 日期间在城市一级创伤中心就诊的患者的医疗记录:(1)中毒诊断,(2)癫痫发作诊断,(3)LEV 给药。我们根据病史、脑电图结果、血酒精浓度、尿液药物筛查和充分的记录将药物诱导性癫痫发作的患者纳入研究。我们排除了酒精戒断、缺氧性脑损伤、其他抗癫痫药物治疗浓度不足、低血糖和假性癫痫发作的患者。主要观察终点包括癫痫发作停止或预防癫痫发作复发。我们通过存在或不存在归因于 LEV 给药的药物不良反应(ADE)来评估安全性。
34 名患者符合纳入和排除标准。研究队列的一半(17 名)表现为全面强直阵挛发作(TCS);另一半(17 名)表现为全面强直阵挛性癫痫持续状态(GCSE)。6 名 GCSE 患者在癫痫发作期间接受了 LEV 治疗;2 名还接受了苯妥英钠治疗。1 名患者在接受 LEV 治疗后立即得到改善,其余 5 名患者的癫痫发作得到控制。11 名 GCSE 患者(65%)在 LEV 治疗后癫痫无发作。TCS 患者(17 名)在癫痫发作控制后接受 LEV 治疗。16 名(94%)在住院期间无癫痫发作。我们未发现药物不良反应。共有 27 名(34 名患者的 79%)患者的神经和身体健康状况恢复到基线水平。6 名患者存在长期后遗症;没有一个是已知的 LEV 副作用。我们共发现 46 种有毒物质和 22 种已知的致痫剂(48%)。中位住院时间为 3.7 天(0.4-96),中位住院期间 LEV 治疗时间为 1.6 天(0-49)。
作为二线药物的 LEV 与控制药物诱导性癫痫发作和预防癫痫发作复发相关,且无明显不良反应。需要前瞻性研究来证实这些结果。