Suppr超能文献

皮质扣与交叉钉股骨固定在腘绳肌腱前交叉韧带重建中的比较:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。

Cortical Button Versus Cross-pin Femoral Fixation for Hamstring Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Department of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

出版信息

Am J Sports Med. 2018 Jul;46(9):2277-2284. doi: 10.1177/0363546517717672. Epub 2017 Jul 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Incidences of graft rupture are associated with postoperative knee laxity after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Reports of postoperative knee laxity after ACL reconstruction using different femoral fixation techniques in several studies are controversial.

PURPOSE

To compare, via meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), the clinical outcomes and postoperative knee laxity of autogenous hamstring ACL reconstruction using cortical button versus cross-pin femoral fixation.

STUDY DESIGN

Meta-analysis.

METHODS

This study followed the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. The online PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were searched from inception to April 1, 2017. The study included only level 1 or 2 RCTs that compared cortical button and cross-pin femoral fixation for ACL reconstruction with hamstring autografts and that reported clinical outcomes or postoperative knee laxity. The Cochrane Collaboration's risk of bias tool was used to assess the risk of bias for all included studies. For the meta-analysis, the investigators extracted data on clinical outcomes measured by postoperative International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score or Lysholm score and postoperative knee laxity defined as >5 mm side-to-side difference by the arthrometric measurement, Lachman test ≥2+, and pivot-shift test ≥2+. The risk ratio (RR) and its corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) were computed for dichotomous data. Heterogeneity was assessed by I tests.

RESULTS

A total of 6 RCTs with 445 patients were included. Statistical analysis of pooled data showed no significant difference between the cortical button and cross-pin groups on postoperative IKDC score (RR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.88-1.02; P = .13; I = 4%) and Lysholm score (RR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.91-1.04; P = .45; I = 0%). Postoperative knee laxity was reported in 5 studies, and no significant difference was found between the 2 groups (RR, 1.49; 95% CI, 0.83-2.68; P = .18; I = 37%).

CONCLUSION

Cortical button femoral fixation for autogenous hamstring ACL reconstruction had no significant difference in terms of clinical outcomes and postoperative knee laxity compared with cross-pin femoral fixation.

摘要

背景

前交叉韧带(ACL)重建术后移植物破裂与术后膝关节松弛有关。几项研究报告称,使用不同股骨固定技术进行 ACL 重建术后膝关节松弛的情况存在争议。

目的

通过对随机对照试验(RCT)的荟萃分析,比较使用皮质纽扣与交叉钉股骨固定进行自体腘绳肌腱 ACL 重建的临床结果和术后膝关节松弛情况。

研究设计

荟萃分析。

方法

本研究遵循 PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目)指南。从建库到 2017 年 4 月 1 日,在线检索 PubMed、EMBASE 和 Cochrane 中央对照试验注册库。本研究仅纳入比较皮质纽扣和交叉钉股骨固定用于自体腘绳肌腱 ACL 重建并报告临床结果或术后膝关节松弛的 1 级或 2 级 RCT。使用 Cochrane 协作组的偏倚风险工具评估所有纳入研究的偏倚风险。对于荟萃分析,研究人员提取术后国际膝关节文献委员会(IKDC)评分或 Lysholm 评分测量的临床结果数据,以及通过关节测量、Lachman 试验≥2+和枢轴转移试验≥2+定义的术后膝关节松弛>5mm 侧-侧差异的数据。二项数据采用风险比(RR)及其相应的 95%置信区间(CI)进行计算。通过 I 检验评估异质性。

结果

共纳入 6 项 RCT,共 445 例患者。对汇总数据进行统计学分析显示,皮质纽扣组和交叉钉组在术后 IKDC 评分(RR,0.94;95%CI,0.88-1.02;P=0.13;I=4%)和 Lysholm 评分(RR,0.97;95%CI,0.91-1.04;P=0.45;I=0%)方面无统计学差异。5 项研究报告了术后膝关节松弛情况,两组间无显著差异(RR,1.49;95%CI,0.83-2.68;P=0.18;I=37%)。

结论

与交叉钉股骨固定相比,使用皮质纽扣股骨固定进行自体腘绳肌腱 ACL 重建在临床结果和术后膝关节松弛方面无显著差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验