Neukam Karin, Martínez Alfredo P, Culasso Andrés C A, Ridruejo Ezequiel, García Gabriel, Di Lello Federico A
Universidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquímica, Cátedra de Virología, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla / Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío / CSIC / Universidad de Sevilla, Unit of Infectious Diseases, Microbiology and Preventive Medicine, Seville, Spain.
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 28;12(7):e0182193. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182193. eCollection 2017.
To evaluate the use of hepatitis C virus (HCV) NS3 sequencing as alternative to the comercially available Versant HCV 2.0 reverse hybridization line-probe assay (LiPA 2.0) to determine HCV genotype 1 (HCV-1) subtypes.
A cohort of 104 patients infected by HCV-1 according to LiPA 2.0 was analyzed in a cross-sectional study conducted in patients seen from January 2012 to June 2016 at an outpatient clinic in Buenos Aires, Argentina.
The samples were included within well supported subtype clades: 64 with HCV-1b and 39 with HCV-1a infection. Twenty of the HCV-1a infected patientes were included in a supported sub-clade "1" and 19 individuals were among the basal sub-clade "2". LiPA 2.0 failed to subtype HCV-1 in 20 (19.2%) individuals. Subtype classification determined by NS3 direct sequencing showed that 2/18 (11.1%) of the HCV-1a-infected patients as determined by LiPA 2.0 were in fact infected by HCV-1b. Of the HCV-1b-infected according to LiPA 2.0, 10/66 (15.2%) patients showed HCV-1a infection according to NS3 sequencing. Overall misclassification was 14.3% (κ-index for the concordance with NS3 sequencing = 0.635). One (1%) patient was erroneously genotyped as HCV-1 and was revealed as HCV genotype 4 infection.
Genomic sequencing of the HCV NS3 region represents an adequate alternative since it provides reliable genetic information. It even distinguishes between HCV-1a clades related to resistance-associated substitutions to HCV protease inhibitors, it provides reliable genetic information for genotyping/subgenotyping and simultaneously allows to determine the presence of resistance-associated substitutions to currently recommended DAAs.
评估使用丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)NS3测序替代商业化的Versant HCV 2.0反向杂交线性探针分析(LiPA 2.0)来确定HCV基因型1(HCV-1)亚型的情况。
在阿根廷布宜诺斯艾利斯一家门诊诊所对2012年1月至2016年6月期间就诊的患者进行的一项横断面研究中,分析了一组根据LiPA 2.0检测感染HCV-1的104例患者。
样本被纳入支持良好的亚型分支中:64例为HCV-1b感染,39例为HCV-1a感染。20例HCV-1a感染患者被纳入支持的亚分支“1”,19例个体属于基础亚分支“2”。LiPA 2.0未能对20例(19.2%)个体进行HCV-1亚型分类。NS3直接测序确定的亚型分类显示,LiPA 2.0确定的18例HCV-1a感染患者中有2例(11.1%)实际上感染的是HCV-1b。在LiPA 2.0检测为HCV-1b感染的患者中,根据NS3测序,10/66(15.2%)患者显示为HCV-1a感染。总体错误分类率为14.3%(与NS3测序的一致性κ指数 = 0.