Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Headley Way, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK.
Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, Level 6, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Headley Way, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK.
Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 28;6(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s13643-017-0544-1.
The use of electronic records in healthcare is increasing. To avoid errors, it is essential that the data displays used by these systems are usable: efficient, effective and satisfying. A wide variety of display techniques are used to present clinical data, but the best methods to assess the usability of these techniques have not been determined. This systematic review will answer the question: What methods are employed to assess the usability of electronic visualisations of patient data for clinical use? The results of this systematic review will then be used to inform best assessment and design practice.
MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, OpenGrey, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews will be searched for original studies related to the usability of electronic information visualisations of patient data for clinical use. Reference lists of eligible studies and relevant reviews will be explored to identify further eligible studies.
This systematic review will identify methods used to assess the usability of electronic information visualisations of patient data for clinical use. We will summarise the similarities and differences between the methods found. Our results will inform best practice when developing new user interfaces to display electronic patient data for clinical use.
PROSPERO CRD42016041604.
医疗保健领域中电子病历的使用正在增加。为了避免错误，这些系统使用的数据显示必须是可用的：高效、有效且令人满意。有各种各样的显示技术用于呈现临床数据，但尚未确定评估这些技术可用性的最佳方法。本系统评价将回答以下问题：用于评估临床使用的患者数据电子可视化的可用性的方法有哪些？然后，本系统评价的结果将用于告知最佳评估和设计实践。
将对 MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL、OpenGrey 和 Cochrane 系统评价数据库进行检索，以获取与临床使用的患者数据电子信息可视化的可用性相关的原始研究。将探索合格研究的参考文献列表和相关综述，以确定其他合格研究。
本系统评价将确定用于评估临床使用的患者数据电子信息可视化的可用性的方法。我们将总结所发现方法之间的异同。我们的研究结果将为开发用于临床使用的新用户界面以显示电子患者数据时提供最佳实践依据。
PROSPERO CRD42016041604。
