Imahori Taichiro, Tanaka Kazuhiro, Arai Atsushi, Shiomi Ryoji, Fujiwara Daigo, Mori Tatsuya, Yokote Akiyoshi, Matsushima Kazushi, Matsui Daisaku, Kobayashi Makoto, Fujita Atsushi, Hosoda Kohkichi, Kohmura Eiji
Department of Neurosurgery, Toyooka Hospital, Hyogo, Japan.
Department of Neurosurgery, Toyooka Hospital, Hyogo, Japan.
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2017 Dec;26(12):2793-2799. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2017.06.060. Epub 2017 Jul 25.
There are limited data about the prognostic factors predicting outcomes after mechanical thrombectomy with stent retrievers for the elderly. Here, we evaluated outcomes in elderly patients in a real-world setting.
Between April 2015 and January 2017, 80 patients with anterior intracranial acute large vessel occlusion, who had lived independently before ictus, were treated with mechanical thrombectomy using a stent retriever at our institute. We compared outcomes between patients ≥80 years old (n = 36) and those <80 years old (n = 44), and assessed prognostic factors for favorable outcomes (modified Rankin Scale score 0-2) at 90 days in all patients.
There was no significant difference in baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score and Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score between the 2 groups. Successful revascularization (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction [mTICI] scores 2b/3) (83% versus 93%, P = .286), complete recanalization (mTICI 3) (47% versus 50%, P = .826), and favorable outcomes (42% versus 57%, P = .261) were achieved more often in those <80 years old, but differences did not reach statistical significance. Multivariate regression analysis showed that baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (P = .013) and mTICI scores of 3 (P = .006) were significant predictive factors, but being ≥80 years old and baseline Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score were not. In those ≥80 years old, mTICI score of 3 was an influential factor for favorable outcome (P = .017).
Being aged 80 years or older was not a significant predictor for outcomes after mechanical thrombectomy, whereas complete recanalization was an influential predictor of outcome in the elderly.
关于使用支架取栓器进行机械取栓术后预测老年患者预后因素的数据有限。在此,我们评估了现实环境中老年患者的预后情况。
2015年4月至2017年1月期间,80例颅内前循环急性大血管闭塞且发病前生活能够自理的患者在我院接受了使用支架取栓器的机械取栓治疗。我们比较了年龄≥80岁(n = 36)和<80岁(n = 44)患者的预后情况,并评估了所有患者90天时良好预后(改良Rankin量表评分0 - 2分)的预后因素。
两组患者的基线美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表评分和阿尔伯塔卒中项目早期计算机断层扫描评分无显著差异。年龄<80岁的患者更常实现成功再灌注(改良脑梗死溶栓[mTICI]评分2b/3)(83%对93%,P = 0.286)、完全再通(mTICI 3)(47%对50%,P = 0.826)和良好预后(42%对57%,P = 0.261),但差异未达到统计学意义。多因素回归分析显示,基线美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(P = 0.013)和mTICI评分为3(P = 0.006)是显著的预测因素,但年龄≥80岁和基线阿尔伯塔卒中项目早期计算机断层扫描评分不是。在年龄≥80岁的患者中,mTICI评分为3是良好预后的一个影响因素(P = 0.017)。
80岁及以上并非机械取栓术后预后的显著预测因素,而完全再通是老年患者预后的一个影响性预测因素。