• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全国性胰腺癌手术前瞻性审计:荷兰胰腺癌审计的设计、准确性及结果

Nationwide prospective audit of pancreatic surgery: design, accuracy, and outcomes of the Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Audit.

作者信息

van Rijssen L Bengt, Koerkamp Bas G, Zwart Maurice J, Bonsing Bert A, Bosscha Koop, van Dam Ronald M, van Eijck Casper H, Gerhards Michael F, van der Harst Erwin, de Hingh Ignace H, de Jong Koert P, Kazemier Geert, Klaase Joost, van Laarhoven Cornelis J, Molenaar I Quintus, Patijn Gijs A, Rupert Coen G, van Santvoort Hjalmar C, Scheepers Joris J, van der Schelling George P, Busch Olivier R, Besselink Marc G

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

HPB (Oxford). 2017 Oct;19(10):919-926. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2017.06.010. Epub 2017 Jul 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.hpb.2017.06.010
PMID:28754367
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Auditing is an important tool to identify practice variation and 'best practices'. The Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Audit is mandatory in all 18 Dutch centers for pancreatic surgery.

METHODS

Performance indicators and case-mix factors were identified by a PubMed search for randomized controlled trials (RCT's) and large series in pancreatic surgery. In addition, data dictionaries of two national audits, three institutional databases, and the Dutch national cancer registry were evaluated. Morbidity, mortality, and length of stay were analyzed of all pancreatic resections registered during the first two audit years. Case ascertainment was cross-checked with the Dutch healthcare inspectorate and key-variables validated in all centers.

RESULTS

Sixteen RCT's and three large series were found. Sixteen indicators and 20 case-mix factors were included in the audit. During 2014-2015, 1785 pancreatic resections were registered including 1345 pancreatoduodenectomies. Overall in-hospital mortality was 3.6%. Following pancreatoduodenectomy, mortality was 4.1%, Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ III morbidity was 29.9%, median (IQR) length of stay 12 (9-18) days, and readmission rate 16.0%. In total 97.2% of >40,000 variables validated were consistent with the medical charts.

CONCLUSIONS

The Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Audit, with high quality data, reports good outcomes of pancreatic surgery on a national level.

摘要

背景

审计是识别实践差异和“最佳实践”的重要工具。荷兰胰腺癌审计在荷兰所有18个胰腺手术中心都是强制性的。

方法

通过PubMed搜索胰腺手术的随机对照试验(RCT)和大型系列研究来确定性能指标和病例组合因素。此外,还评估了两项国家审计、三个机构数据库和荷兰国家癌症登记处的数据字典。分析了前两个审计年度登记的所有胰腺切除术的发病率、死亡率和住院时间。病例确定与荷兰医疗保健检查机构进行了交叉核对,并在所有中心对关键变量进行了验证。

结果

发现了16项RCT和3个大型系列研究。审计中纳入了16项指标和20个病例组合因素。在2014 - 2015年期间,登记了1785例胰腺切除术,其中包括1345例胰十二指肠切除术。总体住院死亡率为3.6%。胰十二指肠切除术后,死亡率为4.1%,Clavien - Dindo≥III级发病率为29.9%,中位(IQR)住院时间为12(9 - 18)天,再入院率为16.0%。在>40,000个经过验证的变量中,总计97.2%与病历一致。

结论

荷兰胰腺癌审计拥有高质量数据,在国家层面报告了胰腺手术的良好结果。

相似文献

1
Nationwide prospective audit of pancreatic surgery: design, accuracy, and outcomes of the Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Audit.全国性胰腺癌手术前瞻性审计:荷兰胰腺癌审计的设计、准确性及结果
HPB (Oxford). 2017 Oct;19(10):919-926. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2017.06.010. Epub 2017 Jul 26.
2
Variation in pancreatoduodenectomy as delivered in two national audits.在两项全国性审计中实施的胰十二指肠切除术的差异。
Br J Surg. 2019 May;106(6):747-755. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11085. Epub 2019 Feb 1.
3
Variation in hospital mortality after pancreatoduodenectomy is related to failure to rescue rather than major complications: a nationwide audit.胰十二指肠切除术后医院死亡率的差异与未能成功挽救患者有关,而非主要并发症:一项全国性审计。
HPB (Oxford). 2018 Aug;20(8):759-767. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2018.02.640. Epub 2018 Mar 21.
4
Transatlantic registries of pancreatic surgery in the United States of America, Germany, the Netherlands, and Sweden: Comparing design, variables, patients, treatment strategies, and outcomes.美国、德国、荷兰和瑞典的胰腺外科跨国注册研究:比较设计、变量、患者、治疗策略和结局。
Surgery. 2021 Feb;169(2):396-402. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2020.07.012. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
5
Quality standards in 480 pancreatic resections: a prospective observational study.480例胰腺切除术的质量标准:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2015 Mar;107(3):143-51.
6
Textbook Outcome: Nationwide Analysis of a Novel Quality Measure in Pancreatic Surgery.教科书式结果:胰腺手术新质量指标的全国性分析。
Ann Surg. 2020 Jan;271(1):155-162. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003451.
7
Outcome of Pancreatic Surgery During the First 6 Years of a Mandatory Audit Within the Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group.荷兰胰腺癌研究组强制审计头6年期间的胰腺手术结果
Ann Surg. 2023 Aug 1;278(2):260-266. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005628. Epub 2022 Jul 22.
8
Impact of Complications After Pancreatoduodenectomy on Mortality, Organ Failure, Hospital Stay, and Readmission: Analysis of a Nationwide Audit.胰十二指肠切除术后并发症对死亡率、器官衰竭、住院时间和再入院的影响:全国性审计分析。
Ann Surg. 2022 Jan 1;275(1):e222-e228. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003835.
9
Readmission after pancreatic resection is not an appropriate measure of quality.胰腺切除术后的再入院率不能作为衡量质量的适当指标。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Jun;20(6):1781-7. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2763-y. Epub 2012 Dec 8.
10
Frailty predicts risk of life-threatening complications and mortality after pancreatic resections.衰弱预示着胰腺切除术后出现危及生命的并发症和死亡的风险。
Surgery. 2016 Oct;160(4):987-996. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.07.010. Epub 2016 Aug 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of feeding strategy after pancreatoduodenectomy on delayed gastric emptying and hospital stay: nationwide study.胰十二指肠切除术后喂养策略对胃排空延迟和住院时间的影响:全国性研究
BJS Open. 2025 May 7;9(3). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zraf068.
2
Inter-rater variability for the American Society of Anesthesiologists classification in patients undergoing hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery (MILESTONE-2): international survey among surgeons and anaesthesiologists.肝胰胆手术患者美国麻醉医师协会分级的评分者间变异性(MILESTONE-2):外科医生和麻醉医生的国际调查
BJS Open. 2024 Dec 30;9(1). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae162.
3
Biliary drainage prior to pancreatoduodenectomy with endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy versus conventional ERCP: propensity score-matched study and surgeon survey.
内镜超声引导下胆总管十二指肠吻合术与传统内镜逆行胰胆管造影术在胰十二指肠切除术前的胆道引流:倾向评分匹配研究及外科医生调查
Endoscopy. 2025 Jul;57(7):719-729. doi: 10.1055/a-2543-5672. Epub 2025 Feb 20.
4
Prehabilitation-A Simple Approach for Complex Patients: The Results of a Single-Center Study on Prehabilitation in Patients with Ovarian Cancer Before Cytoreductive Surgery.术前康复——一种针对复杂患者的简单方法:一项关于卵巢癌患者在肿瘤细胞减灭术前进行术前康复的单中心研究结果
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Dec 1;16(23):4032. doi: 10.3390/cancers16234032.
5
Survival scenarios of patients with localized and metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A population-based study.局限性和转移性胰腺腺癌患者的生存情况:一项基于人群的研究。
Int J Cancer. 2025 May 1;156(9):1726-1735. doi: 10.1002/ijc.35267. Epub 2024 Nov 29.
6
Transatlantic differences in the use and outcome of minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy: an international multi-registry analysis.微创胰十二指肠切除术使用情况及结局的跨大西洋差异:一项国际多登记处分析
Surg Endosc. 2024 Dec;38(12):7099-7111. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11161-7. Epub 2024 Sep 28.
7
Feasibility, safety and preliminary efficacy of preoperative stereotactic radiotherapy on the future pancreatic neck transection margin to reduce the risk of pancreatic fistula after high-risk pancreatoduodenectomy (FIBROPANC): protocol for a multicentre, single-arm trial.术前立体定向放疗对未来胰颈横断缘的可行性、安全性和初步疗效,以降低高危胰十二指肠切除术后胰瘘风险(FIBROPANC):多中心、单臂试验方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Sep 24;14(9):e087193. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087193.
8
Surgical Outcome After Distal Pancreatectomy With and Without Portomesenteric Venous Resection in Patients with Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A Transatlantic Evaluation of Patients in North America, Germany, Sweden, and The Netherlands (GAPASURG).胰体尾切除术伴或不伴肠系膜上静脉切除治疗胰腺腺癌患者的手术效果:北美、德国、瑞典和荷兰(GAPASURG)的患者跨大西洋评估。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Nov;31(12):8327-8339. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-15932-3. Epub 2024 Aug 9.
9
Postoperative Adverse Events Following Neoadjuvant Therapy and Surgery for Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer in a Phase 2 Clinical Trial (Alliance A021501).在一项 2 期临床试验(Alliance A021501)中,新辅助治疗和手术治疗边界可切除胰腺癌的术后不良事件。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Oct;31(10):7033-7042. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-15670-6. Epub 2024 Jul 15.
10
Assessing quality of hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery: nationwide benchmarking.评估肝胆胰外科手术质量:全国基准测试。
Br J Surg. 2024 May 3;111(5). doi: 10.1093/bjs/znae119.