• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后因氯吡格雷高血小板反应性所致缺血风险的量化研究(来自药物洗脱支架双重抗血小板治疗评估研究)

Quantifying Ischemic Risk After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Attributable to High Platelet Reactivity on Clopidogrel (From the Assessment of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy with Drug-Eluting Stents Study).

作者信息

Redfors Björn, Ben-Yehuda Ori, Lin Sheng-Hsuan, Furer Ariel, Kirtane Ajay J, Witzenbichler Bernhard, Weisz Giora, Stuckey Thomas D, Maehara Akiko, Généreux Philippe, Giustino Gennaro, Rinaldi Michael J, Neumann Franz-Josef, Metzger D Christopher, Henry Timothy D, Cox David A, Duffy Peter L, Mazzaferri Ernest L, Ayele Girma Minalu, Mehran Roxana, Mintz Gary S, Stone Gregg W

机构信息

Clinical Trials Center, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, New York.

Clinical Trials Center, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, New York; NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2017 Sep 15;120(6):917-923. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.06.019. Epub 2017 Jun 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.06.019
PMID:28754568
Abstract

Patients at high risk of thrombotic events after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) may potentially benefit from intensified antiplatelet therapy. However, more potent antiplatelet therapy would be expected to only overcome risk that is mediated by high platelet reactivity (PR). We used mediation analysis to determine the contribution of residual PR to the 2-year risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACE; the composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or stent thrombosis) associated with clinical risk factors after PCI with drug-eluting stents (DES) in 8,374 patients from the prospective, multicenter Assessment of Dual AntiPlatelet Therapy with Drug-Eluting Stents (ADAPT-DES) registry. Residual PR on clopidogrel, as measured by the VerifyNow P2Y12 point-of-care assay, was included as a continuous linear mediator variable in Cox proportional hazards regression. Among 7 factors independently associated with 2-year MACE, residual PR partly mediated the effect of diabetes (13.4% attributable risk), anemia (22.9% attributable risk), and acute coronary syndromes (7.3% attributable risk). A PR-mediated effect inversely affected the MACE risk associated with smoking (10.4% attributable risk). The increased ischemic risk of chronic kidney disease, multivessel disease, and previous myocardial infarction were not mediated by residual PR. In conclusion, high residual PR mediates little or none of the increased 2-year MACE risk associated with baseline risk factors in patients treated with clopidogrel after successful PCI with DES. Intensifying antiplatelet therapy is therefore unlikely to substantially mitigate the excess ischemic risk from these variables.

摘要

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后有血栓形成事件高风险的患者可能会从强化抗血小板治疗中获益。然而,更强效的抗血小板治疗预计只能克服由高血小板反应性(PR)介导的风险。我们采用中介分析来确定在来自前瞻性多中心药物洗脱支架双重抗血小板治疗评估(ADAPT-DES)注册研究的8374例患者中,PCI植入药物洗脱支架(DES)后,残余PR对与临床风险因素相关的2年主要不良心脏事件(MACE;心脏死亡、心肌梗死或支架血栓形成的复合事件)风险的贡献。通过VerifyNow P2Y12即时检测法测量的氯吡格雷残余PR作为连续线性中介变量纳入Cox比例风险回归分析。在与2年MACE独立相关的7个因素中,残余PR部分介导了糖尿病(归因风险13.4%)、贫血(归因风险22.9%)和急性冠状动脉综合征(归因风险7.3%)的影响。PR介导的效应与吸烟相关的MACE风险呈负相关(归因风险10.4%)。慢性肾病、多支血管病变和既往心肌梗死增加的缺血风险未由残余PR介导。总之,在DES成功PCI后接受氯吡格雷治疗的患者中,高残余PR对与基线风险因素相关的2年MACE风险增加的介导作用很小或不存在。因此,强化抗血小板治疗不太可能显著减轻这些变量带来的额外缺血风险。

相似文献

1
Quantifying Ischemic Risk After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Attributable to High Platelet Reactivity on Clopidogrel (From the Assessment of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy with Drug-Eluting Stents Study).经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后因氯吡格雷高血小板反应性所致缺血风险的量化研究(来自药物洗脱支架双重抗血小板治疗评估研究)
Am J Cardiol. 2017 Sep 15;120(6):917-923. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.06.019. Epub 2017 Jun 28.
2
Is There an Ideal Level of Platelet P2Y12-Receptor Inhibition in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention?: "Window" Analysis From the ADAPT-DES Study (Assessment of Dual AntiPlatelet Therapy With Drug-Eluting Stents).经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者血小板 P2Y12 受体抑制的理想水平是多少?:来自 ADAPT-DES 研究(药物洗脱支架双联抗血小板治疗评估)的“窗口”分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Dec 28;8(15):1978-1987. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.08.032.
3
Platelet Reactivity and Clinical Outcomes After Coronary Artery Implantation of Drug-Eluting Stents in Subjects With Peripheral Arterial Disease: Analysis From the ADAPT-DES Study (Assessment of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy With Drug-Eluting Stents).外周动脉疾病患者冠状动脉植入药物洗脱支架后的血小板反应性及临床结局:来自ADAPT-DES研究(药物洗脱支架双重抗血小板治疗评估)的分析
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Mar;10(3). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.116.004904.
4
Platelet reactivity and cardiovascular events after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with stable coronary artery disease: the Stent Thrombosis In Belgium (STIB) trial.稳定性冠状动脉疾病患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的血小板反应性与心血管事件:比利时支架血栓形成(STIB)试验
EuroIntervention. 2014 Jun;10(2):204-11. doi: 10.4244/EIJV10I2A34.
5
Sex Differences in the Clinical Impact of High Platelet Reactivity After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Drug-Eluting Stents: Results From the ADAPT-DES Study (Assessment of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy With Drug-Eluting Stents).药物洗脱支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后高血小板反应性临床影响的性别差异:ADAPT-DES研究(药物洗脱支架双重抗血小板治疗评估)结果
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Feb;10(2). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.116.003577.
6
Adjunctive cilostazol versus double-dose clopidogrel after drug-eluting stent implantation: the HOST-ASSURE randomized trial (Harmonizing Optimal Strategy for Treatment of Coronary Artery Stenosis-Safety & Effectiveness of Drug-Eluting Stents & Anti-platelet Regimen).支架置入术后联合西洛他唑与氯吡格雷双倍剂量治疗:HOST-ASSURE 随机试验(优化药物洗脱支架治疗策略以确保安全性和有效性及抗血小板方案的冠状动脉狭窄的协调性研究)。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Sep;6(9):932-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.04.022.
7
Routine assessment of on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity and gene polymorphisms in predicting clinical outcome following drug-eluting stent implantation in patients with stable coronary artery disease.常规评估氯吡格雷抵抗血小板活性和基因多态性在预测药物洗脱支架植入术后稳定型冠状动脉疾病患者的临床结局。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Nov;6(11):1166-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.06.010.
8
Platelet Reactivity and Risk of Ischemic Stroke After Coronary Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation: From the ADAPT-DES Study.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗术后血小板反应性与缺血性卒中风险:ADAPT-DES 研究。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Jul 9;11(13):1277-1286. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.01.263. Epub 2018 Jun 13.
9
Impact of Aspirin and Clopidogrel Hyporesponsiveness in Patients Treated With Drug-Eluting Stents: 2-Year Results of a Prospective, Multicenter Registry Study.经药物洗脱支架治疗的患者阿司匹林和氯吡格雷低反应性的影响:一项前瞻性、多中心注册研究的 2 年结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Aug 28;10(16):1607-1617. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.05.059. Epub 2017 Aug 2.
10
Impact of Anemia on Platelet Reactivity and Ischemic and Bleeding Risk: From the Assessment of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy With Drug-Eluting Stents Study.贫血对血小板反应性及缺血和出血风险的影响:来自药物洗脱支架双重抗血小板治疗评估研究
Am J Cardiol. 2016 Jun 15;117(12):1877-83. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.03.034. Epub 2016 Apr 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of ticagrelor and clopidogrel in anemic patients with acute coronary syndrome: efficacy and safety outcomes over one year.替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷在伴有贫血的急性冠脉综合征患者中的比较:一年以上的疗效和安全性结局。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2024 May;80(5):759-770. doi: 10.1007/s00228-024-03653-1. Epub 2024 Feb 16.
2
Resistance on the Latest Oral and Intravenous P2Y12 ADP Receptor Blockers in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes: Fact or Myth?急性冠状动脉综合征患者对最新口服和静脉用P2Y12 ADP受体阻滞剂的耐药性:事实还是误解?
J Clin Med. 2022 Dec 4;11(23):7211. doi: 10.3390/jcm11237211.
3
Circadian variations of platelet reactivity on clopidogrel in patients treated with elective percutaneous coronary intervention.
择期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者氯吡格雷抵抗的血小板反应性的昼夜变化。
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2022 Jul;54(1):15-19. doi: 10.1007/s11239-022-02657-x. Epub 2022 Apr 21.
4
Thrombin Generation as a Method to Identify the Risk of Bleeding in High Clinical-Risk Patients Using Dual Antiplatelet Therapy.凝血酶生成作为一种识别使用双联抗血小板治疗的高临床风险患者出血风险的方法。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Jun 10;8:679934. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.679934. eCollection 2021.