Suppr超能文献

成人非智力障碍自闭症诊断:ADOS-2 和 ADI-R 的准确性。

Diagnosing ASD in Adults Without ID: Accuracy of the ADOS-2 and the ADI-R.

机构信息

Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, via Bassi 21, 27100, Pavia, Italy.

出版信息

J Autism Dev Disord. 2017 Nov;47(11):3370-3379. doi: 10.1007/s10803-017-3258-2.

Abstract

Diagnosing autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in adulthood often represents a challenge in clinical practice. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the ADOS and ADI-R in diagnosing ASD in adults. 113 subjects with an IQ of 70 or above were assessed through an extensive clinical evaluation. The ADOS-2 Module 4 and the ADI-R were separately administered by staff members blind to clinical judgment. Our results cautiously confirm the accuracy of ADOS-2 Module 4, while suggest that ADI-R might not be reliable in adults without intellectual disability. Clinicians' training and experience remains of primary importance while assessing adults who could potentially belong to the autism spectrum.

摘要

在临床实践中,诊断成年自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)通常具有挑战性。本研究旨在评估 ADOS 和 ADI-R 在诊断成年 ASD 中的灵敏度和特异性。通过广泛的临床评估对 113 名智商为 70 或以上的受试者进行评估。ADOS-2 模块 4 和 ADI-R 由对临床判断不知情的工作人员分别进行管理。我们的结果谨慎地证实了 ADOS-2 模块 4 的准确性,同时表明 ADI-R 可能对没有智力残疾的成年人不可靠。在评估可能属于自闭症谱系的成年人时,临床医生的培训和经验仍然至关重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验