Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, via Bassi 21, 27100, Pavia, Italy.
J Autism Dev Disord. 2017 Nov;47(11):3370-3379. doi: 10.1007/s10803-017-3258-2.
Diagnosing autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in adulthood often represents a challenge in clinical practice. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the ADOS and ADI-R in diagnosing ASD in adults. 113 subjects with an IQ of 70 or above were assessed through an extensive clinical evaluation. The ADOS-2 Module 4 and the ADI-R were separately administered by staff members blind to clinical judgment. Our results cautiously confirm the accuracy of ADOS-2 Module 4, while suggest that ADI-R might not be reliable in adults without intellectual disability. Clinicians' training and experience remains of primary importance while assessing adults who could potentially belong to the autism spectrum.
在临床实践中,诊断成年自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)通常具有挑战性。本研究旨在评估 ADOS 和 ADI-R 在诊断成年 ASD 中的灵敏度和特异性。通过广泛的临床评估对 113 名智商为 70 或以上的受试者进行评估。ADOS-2 模块 4 和 ADI-R 由对临床判断不知情的工作人员分别进行管理。我们的结果谨慎地证实了 ADOS-2 模块 4 的准确性,同时表明 ADI-R 可能对没有智力残疾的成年人不可靠。在评估可能属于自闭症谱系的成年人时,临床医生的培训和经验仍然至关重要。