Suppr超能文献

明尼苏达心力衰竭生活问卷的交叉验证

Cross-Validation of the Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire.

作者信息

Mogle Jacqueline, Buck Harleah, Zambroski Cheryl, Alvaro Rosaria, Vellone Ercole

机构信息

Assistant Professor, College of Nursing, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.

Associate Professor, Coordinator of Chronic Illness Initiatives, College of Nursing, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.

出版信息

J Nurs Scholarsh. 2017 Sep;49(5):513-520. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12318. Epub 2017 Jul 29.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) is the leading method for assessing quality of life in patients with heart failure (HF) around the world. However, unique, culture-specific variations in factorial structure have been identified. The current study examined the cross-cultural equivalence of an Italian version of the MLHFQ.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional assessment as part of an HF study in Italy. Patients (n = 1,192; mean age = 72 years, SD = 11) completed demographics, the MLHFQ, and the Short-Form 12 (SF-12).

METHODS

A series of exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were used to develop an appropriate factor model in the current sample.

FINDINGS

We initially fit a confirmatory factor analysis based on published psychometric work validating the MLHFQ. This did not provide adequate fit, and the sample was then randomly split into equivalent subsets to conduct factor analyses with cross-validation. In the first subsample, an exploratory factor analysis uncovered slight modifications to the proposed factor structure that resulted in much improved model fit. The final model included a higher order factor and three subscales: physical, emotional, and social. A cross-validation confirmatory factor analysis using this structure was conducted in the remaining subset to ensure broader applicability of the results. Correlations with the SF-12 were consistent with previous work using these measures.

CONCLUSIONS

Some items of the MLHFQ are sensitive to differences across cultures, and factor structures vary based on where the scale is administered. In spite of these differences, the total score remains a valid and reliable indicator of quality of life in HF patients across cultures.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Cultural influences on quality of life are important to consider when assessing patients' well-being in HF.

摘要

目的

明尼苏达心力衰竭生活问卷(MLHFQ)是全球评估心力衰竭(HF)患者生活质量的主要方法。然而,已发现其因子结构存在独特的、特定文化的差异。本研究检验了意大利语版MLHFQ的跨文化等效性。

设计

作为意大利一项HF研究的一部分进行横断面评估。患者(n = 1192;平均年龄 = 72岁,标准差 = 11)完成了人口统计学信息、MLHFQ和简短健康调查问卷12项版(SF - 12)。

方法

使用一系列探索性和验证性因子分析来建立当前样本中的合适因子模型。

结果

我们最初基于已发表的验证MLHFQ的心理测量学研究进行了验证性因子分析。但拟合效果不佳,随后将样本随机分为等效子集进行交叉验证的因子分析。在第一个子样本中,探索性因子分析发现对提议的因子结构进行了轻微修改,从而使模型拟合度大幅提高。最终模型包括一个高阶因子和三个子量表:身体、情感和社会。在其余子集中使用此结构进行交叉验证的验证性因子分析以确保结果具有更广泛的适用性。与SF - 12的相关性与先前使用这些测量方法的研究一致。

结论

MLHFQ的一些项目对不同文化间的差异敏感,因子结构因量表施测地点而异。尽管存在这些差异,但总分仍是跨文化HF患者生活质量的有效且可靠指标。

临床意义

评估HF患者的幸福感时,文化对生活质量的影响很重要,需要加以考虑。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验