Department of CT Diagnostics, The Central Hospital of Cangzhou, Cangzhou, Hebei, China (mainland).
Department of Food and Bioengineering, Cangzhou Technical College, Cangzhou, Hebei, China (mainland).
Med Sci Monit. 2017 Jul 29;23:3687-3696. doi: 10.12659/msm.902155.
BACKGROUND Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) is considered to be useful for the diagnosis of myocarditis, and the Lake Louise Criteria (LLC) has been proved to be of significance as the standard of diagnosis. However, the diagnostic performance of LLC-based CMRI for myocarditis compared with endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) has not been quantitatively evaluated in a meta-analysis. MATERIAL AND METHODS The databases PubMed, Cochrane's Library, and EMBASE were searched to identify studies on LLC and its individual components for the diagnosis of myocarditis. EMB was the control reference. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative diagnostic likelihood ratios were calculated with a random-effects model. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was estimated to show overall effectiveness. RESULTS We included 9 cohorts (614 patients) of patients with suspected MC. The combined sensitivities, specificities, and AUCs for T1-weighed global relative enhancement were 0.66, 0.73, and 0.71; for T2-weighed edema ratio they were 0.52, 0.73, and 0.72; for the late gadolinium enhancement, they were 0.70, 0.57, and 0.67; and for LLC-based CMRI they were 0.70, 0.56, and 0.70, respectively. Subgroup analysis indicated that the sensitivities, specificities, and diagnostic accuracies of LLC and its individual component-based CMRI seemed to be similar in patients with acute or chronic myocarditis. Results of the Deeks' funnel plot asymmetry test showed no significant publication bias among the studies. CONCLUSIONS CMRI based on LLC or its individual components seems to have moderate accuracy in diagnosis of acute or chronic myocarditis.
背景
心脏磁共振成像(CMRI)被认为对心肌炎的诊断有用,并且已经证明 Lake Louise 标准(LLC)作为诊断标准具有重要意义。然而,基于 LLC 的 CMRI 与心内膜心肌活检(EMB)相比,其对心肌炎的诊断性能尚未在荟萃分析中进行定量评估。
材料和方法
检索了 PubMed、Cochrane's Library 和 EMBASE 数据库,以确定 LLC 及其各个组成部分用于诊断心肌炎的研究。EMB 是对照参考。使用随机效应模型计算了敏感性、特异性和阳性与阴性诊断似然比。受试者工作特征曲线下的面积(AUC)用于评估整体效果。
结果
我们纳入了 9 个队列(614 例疑似 MC 患者)的患者。T1 加权整体相对增强的联合敏感性、特异性和 AUC 分别为 0.66、0.73 和 0.71;T2 加权水肿比为 0.52、0.73 和 0.72;晚期钆增强的敏感性、特异性和 AUC 分别为 0.70、0.57 和 0.67;基于 LLC 的 CMRI 的敏感性、特异性和诊断准确性分别为 0.70、0.56 和 0.70。亚组分析表明,在急性或慢性心肌炎患者中,LLC 及其各组成部分的 CMRI 的敏感性、特异性和诊断准确性似乎相似。Deeks 漏斗图不对称检验结果表明,研究之间无显著发表偏倚。
结论
基于 LLC 或其各个组成部分的 CMRI 在诊断急性或慢性心肌炎方面似乎具有中等准确性。