Department of Occupational Therapy, University of Alberta, 3-48 Corbett Hall, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2G4, Canada.
Workers' Compensation Board of Alberta Millard Health, Edmonton, Canada.
J Occup Rehabil. 2018 Jun;28(2):332-345. doi: 10.1007/s10926-017-9721-2.
Purpose To examine construct and concurrent validity of the Readiness for Return-To-Work (RRTW) Scale with injured workers participating in an outpatient occupational rehabilitation program. Methods Lost-time claimants (n = 389) with sub-acute or chronic musculoskeletal disorders completed the RRTW Scale on their first day of their occupational rehabilitation program. Statistical analysis included exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses of the readiness items, reliability analyses, and correlation with related scales and questionnaires. Results For claimants in the non-job attached/not working group (n = 165), three factors were found (1) Contemplation (2) Prepared for Action-Self-evaluative and (3) Prepared for Action-Behavioural. The precontemplation stage was not identified within this sample of injured workers. For claimants who were job attached/working group in some capacity (n = 224), two factors were identified (1) Uncertain Maintenance and (2) Proactive Maintenance. Expected relationships and statistically significant differences were found among the identified Return-To-Work (RTW) readiness factors and related constructs of pain, physical and mental health and RTW expectations. Conclusion Construct and concurrent validity of the RRTW Scale were supported in this study. The results of this study indicate the construct of readiness for RTW can vary by disability duration and occupational category. Physical health appears to be a significant barrier to RRTW for the job attached/working group while mental health significantly compromises RRTW with the non-job attached/not working group.
目的 研究参与门诊职业康复计划的受伤工人对《重返工作岗位准备度(RRTW)量表》的结构效度和同时效度。
方法 失时索赔人(n=389)患有亚急性或慢性肌肉骨骼疾病,在职业康复计划的第一天完成 RRTW 量表。统计分析包括准备项目的探索性和验证性因子分析、可靠性分析以及与相关量表和问卷的相关性。
结果 对于未从事工作/未工作的索赔人组(n=165),发现了三个因素(1)思考(2)自我评估的行动准备和(3)行为准备。在这个受伤工人样本中,没有确定前思考阶段。对于以某种身份从事工作/工作的索赔人组(n=224),确定了两个因素(1)不确定维持和(2)主动维持。在确定的重返工作岗位(RRTW)准备度因素和相关的疼痛、身心健康和 RRTW 期望的结构中,发现了预期的关系和统计学上显著的差异。
结论 在这项研究中,RRTW 量表的结构和同时效度得到了支持。这项研究的结果表明,RRTW 的准备度结构可以因残疾持续时间和职业类别而异。对于从事工作/工作的群体,身体健康似乎是 RRTW 的一个重大障碍,而心理健康则严重影响非从事工作/不工作的群体的 RRTW。