Department of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NTNU, MTFS, Postboks 8905, 7491, Trondheim, Norway.
Unicare Helsefort Rehabilitation Centre, Rissa, Norway.
J Occup Rehabil. 2022 Sep;32(3):426-437. doi: 10.1007/s10926-021-10009-4. Epub 2021 Oct 16.
Purpose The Readiness for Return to Work (RRTW) scale is used to evaluate workers' readiness to resume work after sick leave. Previous research has questioned the RRTW scale's constructs and stages. The aim of this study was to assess the unidimensionality of the RRTW scale and its six subscales by evaluating its fit to the Rasch model, and furthermore to assess if Rasch-based scaling would improve its predictive value, compared with the conventional use of the scale. Methods A prospective cohort study with 12 months of follow-up. Individuals (n = 397) sick-listed due to musculoskeletal, unspecified, or common mental health disorders undergoing rehabilitation were included: 191 were full-time sick-listed (not working), and 206 were part-time sick-listed (working). A Rasch analysis was applied to evaluate the measurement properties of the RRTW scale in the working and not working participants at baseline. Linear and logistic regressions were used to assess how well Rasch-based scaling predicted future work participation during the 12 months of follow-up. Results The RRTW subscales had too few items to represent underlying dimensions properly, and the items fitted poorly within the subscales. A constructed variable based on the items that fit together for not working individuals poorly predicted future work participation. The individuals' scores across stages were disordered, indicating a lack of ordered stages. Conclusions This study reveals poor measurement properties of the Norwegian version of the RRTW scale in individuals with musculoskeletal and common mental disorders, with neither the subscales nor the stages closely associated with return to work.
恢复工作准备度(RRTW)量表用于评估员工在病假后恢复工作的准备情况。先前的研究对 RRTW 量表的结构和阶段提出了质疑。本研究旨在通过评估其对 Rasch 模型的拟合度来评估 RRTW 量表及其六个分量表的单维性,并且进一步评估与量表的常规使用相比,基于 Rasch 的定标是否会提高其预测价值。
这是一项前瞻性队列研究,随访时间为 12 个月。纳入了因肌肉骨骼、未指定或常见心理健康障碍接受康复治疗而请病假的个体(n=397):191 人全职请病假(不工作),206 人兼职请病假(工作)。应用 Rasch 分析评估基线时工作和不工作参与者的 RRTW 量表的测量特性。线性和逻辑回归用于评估基于 Rasch 的定标在 12 个月随访期间对未来工作参与的预测效果如何。
RRTW 分量表的项目太少,无法很好地代表潜在维度,而且项目在分量表内的拟合效果不佳。基于对不工作个体拟合不佳的项目构建的变量可以很好地预测未来的工作参与。个体在各阶段的得分无序,表明缺乏有序的阶段。
本研究揭示了肌肉骨骼和常见精神障碍个体的挪威版 RRTW 量表测量特性较差,无论是分量表还是阶段都与重返工作岗位没有密切关联。