Department of Research and Development, Norwegian Air Ambulance Foundation, Drøbak, Norway.
Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.
Crit Care. 2017 Jul 31;21(1):192. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1787-x.
Pre-hospital endotracheal intubation is frequently used for trauma patients in many emergency medical systems. Despite a wide range of publications in the field, it is debated whether the intervention is associated with a favourable outcome, when compared to more conservative airway measures.
A systematic literature search was conducted to identify interventional and observational studies where the mortality rates of adult trauma patients undergoing pre-hospital endotracheal intubation were compared to those undergoing emergency department intubation.
Twenty-one studies examining 35,838 patients were included. The median mortality rate in patients undergoing pre-hospital intubation was 48% (range 8-94%), compared to 29% (range 6-67%) in patients undergoing intubation in the emergency department. Odds ratios were in favour of emergency department intubation both in crude and adjusted mortality, with 2.56 (95% CI: 2.06, 3.18) and 2.59 (95% CI: 1.97, 3.39), respectively. The overall quality of evidence is very low. Twelve of the twenty-one studies found a significantly higher mortality rate after pre-hospital intubation, seven found no significant differences, one found a positive effect, and for one study an analysis of the mortality rate was beyond the scope of the article.
The rationale for wide and unspecific indications for pre-hospital intubation seems to lack support in the literature, despite several publications involving a relatively large number of patients. Pre-hospital intubation is a complex intervention where guidelines and research findings should be approached cautiously. The association between pre-hospital intubation and a higher mortality rate does not necessarily contradict the importance of the intervention, but it does call for a thorough investigation by clinicians and researchers into possible causes for this finding.
在许多急救医疗体系中,院前气管插管常用于创伤患者。尽管该领域有广泛的文献报道,但与更保守的气道措施相比,干预是否与有利的结果相关仍存在争议。
系统地进行了文献检索,以确定对成人创伤患者进行院前气管插管的死亡率与在急诊科进行气管插管的死亡率进行比较的干预性和观察性研究。
共纳入 21 项研究,涉及 35838 例患者。行院前插管的患者的中位死亡率为 48%(范围为 8%-94%),而行急诊科插管的患者的死亡率为 29%(范围为 6%-67%)。在未校正和校正死亡率中,接受急诊科插管的患者的比值比均有利于急诊科插管,分别为 2.56(95%CI:2.06,3.18)和 2.59(95%CI:1.97,3.39)。证据的总体质量非常低。21 项研究中有 12 项发现院前插管后的死亡率明显更高,7 项研究未发现显著差异,1 项研究发现阳性效果,而有一项研究的死亡率分析超出了文章的范围。
尽管有几项涉及相对大量患者的研究,但院前广泛和不明确的插管指征的理论依据似乎在文献中缺乏支持。院前插管是一种复杂的干预措施,应谨慎地遵循指南和研究结果。院前插管与死亡率较高之间的关联不一定与干预的重要性相矛盾,但它确实需要临床医生和研究人员对这一发现的可能原因进行彻底调查。