Department of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, Wolfson Brain Imaging Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Behavioural and Clinical Neuroscience Institute, Wolfson Brain Imaging Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Department of Psychology, Wolfson Brain Imaging Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Behavioural and Clinical Neuroscience Institute, Wolfson Brain Imaging Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Biol Psychiatry. 2017 Dec 15;82(12):895-903. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2017.06.016. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
Impaired regulation of emotional responses to potential threat is a core feature of affective disorders. However, while the subcortical circuitry responsible for processing and expression of fear has been well characterized, the top-down control of this circuitry is less well understood. Our recent studies demonstrated that heightened emotionality, as measured both physiologically and behaviorally, during conditioned fear and innate/social threat was induced, independently, by excitotoxic lesions of either the anterior orbitofrontal cortex (antOFC) or ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (vlPFC). An important outstanding question is whether the antOFC and vlPFC act on common or distinct downstream targets to regulate negative emotion.
The question was addressed by combining localized excitotoxic lesions in the PFC of a nonhuman primate and functional neuroimaging ([F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography) with a fear-regulating extinction paradigm. Marmoset monkeys with unilateral lesions of either the antOFC or vlPFC were scanned immediately following exposure to a fearful or safe context, and differences in [F]fluorodeoxyglucose uptake were evaluated.
[F]fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in the insula and amygdala of the intact hemisphere was significantly increased in response to the fearful context compared with the safe context. Such discrimination between the two contexts was not reflected in the activity of the insula-amygdala of the antOFC or vlPFC-lesioned hemisphere. Instead, uptake was at an intermediate level in both contexts.
These findings demonstrate that the distinct control functions of the antOFC and vlPFC converge on the same downstream targets to promote emotion regulation, taking us closer to a mechanistic understanding of different forms of anxiety.
对潜在威胁的情绪反应调节受损是情感障碍的核心特征。然而,尽管负责处理和表达恐惧的皮质下回路已经得到很好的描述,但对该回路的自上而下控制的理解还不够充分。我们最近的研究表明,无论是通过前眶额皮质(antOFC)还是腹外侧前额皮质(vlPFC)的兴奋性毒性损伤独立诱导,在条件性恐惧和先天/社会威胁期间,生理和行为上都表现出情绪增强,这表明兴奋性毒性损伤独立诱导了条件性恐惧和先天/社会威胁期间的情绪增强。一个重要的悬而未决的问题是,antOFC 和 vlPFC 是否作用于共同或不同的下游靶点来调节负性情绪。
通过将非人类灵长类动物大脑前额叶的局部兴奋性毒性损伤与功能神经影像学([F]氟脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描)相结合,并结合恐惧调节消退范式,解决了这个问题。单侧 antOFC 或 vlPFC 损伤的狨猴在暴露于恐惧或安全环境后立即进行扫描,并评估[F]氟脱氧葡萄糖摄取的差异。
与安全环境相比,完整半球的岛叶和杏仁核的[F]氟脱氧葡萄糖摄取在恐惧环境中显著增加。这种对两种环境的区分并没有反映在 antOFC 或 vlPFC 损伤半球的岛叶-杏仁核的活动中。相反,在两种环境中摄取水平处于中间水平。
这些发现表明,antOFC 和 vlPFC 的不同控制功能集中在相同的下游靶点上,以促进情绪调节,使我们更接近对不同形式焦虑的机制理解。