Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of California, Irvine Medical Center, Orange, CA, USA.
Roswell Park Cancer Institute, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Lancet. 2017 Oct 7;390(10103):1654-1663. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31607-0. Epub 2017 Jul 27.
On Aug 14, 2014, the US Food and Drug Administration approved the antiangiogenesis drug bevacizumab for women with advanced cervical cancer on the basis of improved overall survival (OS) after the second interim analysis (in 2012) of 271 deaths in the Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) 240 trial. In this study, we report the prespecified final analysis of the primary objectives, OS and adverse events.
In this randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial, we recruited patients with metastatic, persistent, or recurrent cervical carcinoma from 81 centres in the USA, Canada, and Spain. Inclusion criteria included a GOG performance status score of 0 or 1; adequate renal, hepatic, and bone marrow function; adequately anticoagulated thromboembolism; a urine protein to creatinine ratio of less than 1; and measurable disease. Patients who had received chemotherapy for recurrence and those with non-healing wounds or active bleeding conditions were ineligible. We randomly allocated patients 1:1:1:1 (blocking used; block size of four) to intravenous chemotherapy of either cisplatin (50 mg/m on day 1 or 2) plus paclitaxel (135 mg/m or 175 mg/m on day 1) or topotecan (0·75 mg/m on days 1-3) plus paclitaxel (175 mg/m on day 1) with or without intravenous bevacizumab (15 mg/kg on day 1) in 21 day cycles until disease progression, unacceptable toxic effects, voluntary withdrawal by the patient, or complete response. We stratified randomisation by GOG performance status (0 vs 1), previous radiosensitising platinum-based chemotherapy, and disease status (recurrent or persistent vs metastatic). We gave treatment open label. Primary outcomes were OS (analysed in the intention-to-treat population) and adverse events (analysed in all patients who received treatment and submitted adverse event information), assessed at the second interim and final analysis by the masked Data and Safety Monitoring Board. The cutoff for final analysis was 450 patients with 346 deaths. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00803062.
Between April 6, 2009, and Jan 3, 2012, we enrolled 452 patients (225 [50%] in the two chemotherapy-alone groups and 227 [50%] in the two chemotherapy plus bevacizumab groups). By March 7, 2014, 348 deaths had occurred, meeting the prespecified cutoff for final analysis. The chemotherapy plus bevacizumab groups continued to show significant improvement in OS compared with the chemotherapy-alone groups: 16·8 months in the chemotherapy plus bevacizumab groups versus 13·3 months in the chemotherapy-alone groups (hazard ratio 0·77 [95% CI 0·62-0·95]; p=0·007). Final OS among patients not receiving previous pelvic radiotherapy was 24·5 months versus 16·8 months (0·64 [0·37-1·10]; p=0·11). Postprogression OS was not significantly different between the chemotherapy plus bevacizumab groups (8·4 months) and chemotherapy-alone groups (7·1 months; 0·83 [0·66-1·05]; p=0·06). Fistula (any grade) occurred in 32 (15%) of 220 patients in the chemotherapy plus bevacizumab groups (all previously irradiated) versus three (1%) of 220 in the chemotherapy-alone groups (all previously irradiated). Grade 3 fistula developed in 13 (6%) versus one (<1%). No fistulas resulted in surgical emergencies, sepsis, or death.
The benefit conferred by incorporation of bevacizumab is sustained with extended follow-up as evidenced by the overall survival curves remaining separated. After progression while receiving bevacizumab, we did not observe a negative rebound effect (ie, shorter survival after bevacizumab is stopped than after chemotherapy alone is stopped). These findings represent proof-of-concept of the efficacy and tolerability of antiangiogenesis therapy in advanced cervical cancer.
National Cancer Institute.
2014 年 8 月 14 日,美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)基于 Gynecologic Oncology Group(GOG)240 试验第二次中期分析(2012 年)中 271 例死亡患者的总生存期(OS)改善,批准将抗血管生成药物贝伐单抗用于晚期宫颈癌女性。在这项研究中,我们报告了主要目标、OS 和不良事件的预设最终分析。
这是一项随机、对照、开放性、3 期临床试验,我们从美国、加拿大和西班牙的 81 个中心招募了转移性、持续性或复发性宫颈癌患者。纳入标准包括:GOG 表现状态评分为 0 或 1;肾功能、肝功能和骨髓功能充足;充分抗凝血栓栓塞;尿蛋白/肌酐比值小于 1;有可测量的疾病。接受复发化疗的患者和非愈合性伤口或有活动性出血的患者不符合条件。我们将患者以 1:1:1:1 的比例随机分配至静脉化疗组,其中一组接受顺铂(第 1 或 2 天 50mg/m)加紫杉醇(第 1 天 135mg/m 或 175mg/m),一组接受拓扑替康(第 1-3 天 0.75mg/m)加紫杉醇(第 1 天 175mg/m),另一组加用或不加用贝伐单抗(第 1 天 15mg/kg),每 21 天为一周期,直至疾病进展、无法耐受的毒性作用、患者自愿退出或完全缓解。我们按 GOG 表现状态(0 与 1)、既往放射增敏性铂类化疗和疾病状态(复发性或持续性与转移性)进行分层随机化。我们对治疗组进行开放性标记。主要终点是 OS(在意向治疗人群中进行分析)和不良事件(在所有接受治疗并提交不良事件信息的患者中进行分析),由盲法数据和安全监测委员会在第二次中期和最终分析时进行评估。最终分析的截止时间为 450 例患者发生 346 例死亡。该试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov 上注册,编号为 NCT00803062。
2009 年 4 月 6 日至 2012 年 1 月 3 日期间,我们共纳入 452 例患者(两组化疗组各 225 例[50%],两组化疗加贝伐单抗组各 227 例[50%])。截至 2014 年 3 月 7 日,已有 348 例死亡,达到最终分析的预设截止时间。与化疗组相比,化疗加贝伐单抗组的 OS 持续改善:化疗加贝伐单抗组 16.8 个月,化疗组 13.3 个月(风险比 0.77 [95%CI 0.62-0.95];p=0.007)。未接受过盆腔放疗的患者的最终 OS 为 24.5 个月,16.8 个月(0.64 [0.37-1.10];p=0.11)。化疗加贝伐单抗组(8.4 个月)和化疗组(7.1 个月;0.83 [0.66-1.05];p=0.06)的疾病进展后 OS 无显著差异。在接受化疗加贝伐单抗治疗的 220 例患者中(所有均接受过放射治疗),有 32 例(15%)发生任何级别的瘘管(均为先前接受过放射治疗的患者),而在接受化疗的 220 例患者中,有 3 例(1%)发生瘘管(均为先前接受过放射治疗的患者)。3 级瘘管分别发生在 13 例(6%)和 1 例(<1%)。没有瘘管导致手术紧急情况、脓毒症或死亡。
在贝伐单抗加入后的随访中,我们观察到总体生存曲线仍然分开,这证明了所获得的益处是持续的。在接受贝伐单抗治疗后进展时,我们没有观察到负性反弹效应(即,与单独停止化疗相比,停止贝伐单抗治疗后的生存期更短)。这些发现代表了在晚期宫颈癌中抗血管生成治疗的疗效和耐受性的概念验证。
美国国立卫生研究院。