Rosen Virginia M, Guerra Ines, McCormack Mary, Nogueira-Rodrigues Angélica, Sasse Andre, Munk Veronica C, Shang Aijing
*Optum, Eden Prairie, MN; †Mapi Group, Uxbridge; and ‡University College London Hospitals, London, UK; §Federal University, Belo Horizonte; and ∥State University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil; and ¶F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland.
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2017 Jul;27(6):1237-1246. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000001000.
Despite advances in cervical cancer prevention and diagnosis, outcomes for patients given a diagnosis of advanced and recurrent disease are poor. In the GOG240 trial, the addition of bevacizumab to paclitaxel-topotecan or paclitaxel-cisplatin has been shown to prolong survival compared with paclitaxel-topotecan or paclitaxel-cisplatin in patients with persistent, recurrent, or metastatic disease. However, standards of care vary between regions and countries. The purpose of this systematic review and network meta-analysis was to enable a comparison between bevacizumab + chemotherapy with multiple monotherapy or combination chemotherapy regimens in the treatment for women with advanced, recurrent, or persistent cervical cancer.
METHODS/MATERIALS: A systematic literature review was conducted to identify randomized or nonrandomized controlled trials of patients with recurrent, persistent, or metastatic cervical cancer published in English from 1999 to 2015. A feasibility study was performed to assess the heterogeneity of the trials, and a network meta-analysis was conducted. Fixed- and random-effects models were fitted to calculate the hazard ratio for overall survival (OS) for all pairwise comparisons and ranking of all interventions.
Twenty-three studies (19 trials) met inclusion criteria and were included in the review. Sample sizes ranged from 69 to 452, and median patient age ranged from 45 to 53 years. There was a trend toward prolonged OS with cisplatin-paclitaxel-bevacizumab and topotecan-paclitaxel-bevacizumab compared with all non-bevacizumab-containing therapies. Cisplatin-paclitaxel-bevacizumab had the highest probability of being the most efficacious compared with all regimens (68.1%), and cisplatin monotherapy had the lowest (0%).
The results of this network meta-analysis show that bevacizumab in combination with paclitaxel-topotecan or paclitaxel-cisplatin is likely to prolong OS over other non-bevacizumab-containing chemotherapies (eg, paclitaxel-carboplatin), which were not included in the GOG240 trial. In patients with advanced, persistent, and recurrent cervical cancer, cisplatin-paclitaxel-bevacizumab and topotecan-paclitaxel-bevacizumab showed the highest efficacy in all regimens investigated in this analysis.
尽管宫颈癌的预防和诊断取得了进展,但晚期和复发性疾病患者的预后仍然很差。在GOG240试验中,与紫杉醇-拓扑替康或紫杉醇-顺铂相比,对于持续性、复发性或转移性疾病患者,在紫杉醇-拓扑替康或紫杉醇-顺铂基础上加用贝伐单抗已显示可延长生存期。然而,不同地区和国家的治疗标准各不相同。本系统评价和网状Meta分析的目的是比较贝伐单抗联合化疗与多种单药或联合化疗方案在晚期、复发性或持续性宫颈癌女性治疗中的效果。
方法/材料:进行系统的文献综述,以识别1999年至2015年以英文发表的复发性、持续性或转移性宫颈癌患者的随机或非随机对照试验。进行可行性研究以评估试验的异质性,并进行网状Meta分析。采用固定效应模型和随机效应模型计算所有成对比较的总生存期(OS)风险比以及所有干预措施的排名。
23项研究(19项试验)符合纳入标准并纳入综述。样本量从69到452不等,患者年龄中位数从45到53岁不等。与所有不含贝伐单抗的治疗方法相比,顺铂-紫杉醇-贝伐单抗和拓扑替康-紫杉醇-贝伐单抗有延长OS的趋势。与所有方案相比,顺铂-紫杉醇-贝伐单抗成为最有效的方案的概率最高(68.1%),顺铂单药治疗的概率最低(0%)。
本网状Meta分析结果表明,与其他不含贝伐单抗的化疗方法(如紫杉醇-卡铂)相比,贝伐单抗联合紫杉醇-拓扑替康或紫杉醇-顺铂可能会延长OS,而这些方法未纳入GOG240试验。在晚期、持续性和复发性宫颈癌患者中,顺铂-紫杉醇-贝伐单抗和拓扑替康-紫杉醇-贝伐单抗在本分析中研究的所有方案中显示出最高的疗效。