Suppr超能文献

经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)对图片命名和单词阅读的调制:单次 tDCS 应用于健康参与者的荟萃分析。

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) modulation of picture naming and word reading: A meta-analysis of single session tDCS applied to healthy participants.

机构信息

Aston University, Life & Health Sciences, Aston Triangle, Birmingham B4 7ET, UK.

Aston University, Life & Health Sciences, Aston Triangle, Birmingham B4 7ET, UK.

出版信息

Neuropsychologia. 2017 Sep;104:234-249. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.07.031. Epub 2017 Jul 27.

Abstract

Recent reviews quantifying the effects of single sessions of transcranial direct current stimulation (or tDCS) in healthy volunteers find only minor effects on cognition despite the popularity of this technique. Here, we wanted to quantify the effects of tDCS on language production tasks that measure word reading and picture naming. We reviewed 14 papers measuring tDCS effects across a total of 96 conditions to a) quantify effects of conventional stimulation on language regions (i.e., left hemisphere anodal tDCS administered to temporal/frontal areas) under normal conditions or under conditions of cognitive (semantic) interference; b) identify parameters which may moderate the size of the tDCS effect within conventional stimulation protocols (e.g., online vs offline, high vs. low current densities, and short vs. long durations), as well as within types of stimulation not typically explored by previous reviews (i.e., right hemisphere anodal tDCS or left/right hemisphere cathodal tDCS). In all analyses there was no significant effect of tDCS, but we did find a small but significant effect of time and duration of stimulation with stronger effects for offline stimulation and for shorter durations (< 15min). We also found some indication of publication bias towards reporting positive effects. We encourage further experimentation in order resolve the disparity between the current popularity of tDCS and its poor efficacy in healthy participants.

摘要

最近的综述评估了单次经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)对健康志愿者认知的影响,尽管这种技术很流行,但只发现了对认知的微小影响。在这里,我们想定量评估 tDCS 对语言产生任务的影响,这些任务测量单词阅读和图片命名。我们综述了 14 篇论文,这些论文共测量了 96 种条件下的 tDCS 效应,目的是:a)量化常规刺激对语言区域(即左半球经颅直流电刺激颞叶/额叶区域)的影响,在正常条件下或在认知(语义)干扰条件下;b)确定可能调节常规刺激方案内 tDCS 效应大小的参数(例如,在线与离线、高与低电流密度、短与长持续时间),以及在以前的综述中通常不探讨的刺激类型内的参数(即右半球经颅直流电刺激或左/右半球经颅直流电刺激)。在所有分析中,tDCS 均无显著影响,但我们确实发现刺激时间和持续时间有微弱但显著的影响,离线刺激和较短的持续时间(<15 分钟)效果更强。我们还发现了一些发表偏倚的迹象,即偏向报告积极影响。我们鼓励进一步进行实验,以解决 tDCS 当前的流行度与其在健康参与者中的低疗效之间的差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验