• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“我一直没抽出时间来做这件事”:男性应对与BRCA相关癌症风险的方式。

"I've just never gotten around to doing it": Men's approaches to managing BRCA-related cancer risks.

作者信息

Rauscher Emily A, Dean Marleah

机构信息

Department of Communication, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.

Department of Communication, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2018 Feb;101(2):340-345. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.07.015. Epub 2017 Jul 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2017.07.015
PMID:28757302
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine men's approaches to managing BRCA-related cancer risks.

METHODS

25 Qualitative interviews were conducted with men who are at risk for BRCA-related cancers. Thematic analysis was conducted using the constant comparison.

RESULTS

Qualitative analysis revealed two different approaches for how men managed their BRCA-related cancer risks. Men were engaged when: (1) initially seeking information, (2) uptake of genetic testing, and (3) population screening procedures. Men were passively avoidant for: (1) follow-up information seeking, (2) uptake of genetic testing, and (3) BRCA-specific screening. Men's justifications for engaged risk management were to: (1) protect their family, (2) respond to encouragement from others, and (3) get knowledge for themselves. Their justifications for passively avoidant management were due to: (1) limited access to clear risk information, (2) little fear of cancer development, (3) barriers to testing/screening, and (4) reliance on incomplete illness representations.

CONCLUSIONS

Men at risk for developing BRCA-related cancers approached risk management by primarily using a passive avoidance approach. That approach should be interpreted in context with the inconsistent information available to them, and the minimal NCCN guidelines for their risk surveillance.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Findings may assist healthcare providers and family members in helping men manage their BRCA-related cancer risks.

摘要

目的

研究男性应对与BRCA相关的癌症风险的方式。

方法

对有患BRCA相关癌症风险的男性进行了25次定性访谈。采用持续比较法进行主题分析。

结果

定性分析揭示了男性应对其BRCA相关癌症风险的两种不同方式。男性在以下情况下积极参与:(1)最初寻求信息时,(2)接受基因检测时,以及(3)进行群体筛查程序时。男性在以下情况下被动回避:(1)后续寻求信息时,(2)接受基因检测时,以及(3)进行BRCA特异性筛查时。男性积极进行风险管理的理由是:(1)保护家人,(2)回应他人的鼓励,以及(3)为自己获取知识。他们被动回避管理的理由是:(1)获取明确风险信息的机会有限,(2)对癌症发展的恐惧较小,(3)检测/筛查存在障碍,以及(4)依赖不完整的疾病认知。

结论

有患BRCA相关癌症风险的男性主要通过被动回避的方式来应对风险管理。这种方式应结合他们可获得的不一致信息以及针对其风险监测的极少的美国国立综合癌症网络(NCCN)指南来进行解读。

实践意义

研究结果可能有助于医疗保健提供者和家庭成员帮助男性应对其BRCA相关的癌症风险。

相似文献

1
"I've just never gotten around to doing it": Men's approaches to managing BRCA-related cancer risks.“我一直没抽出时间来做这件事”:男性应对与BRCA相关癌症风险的方式。
Patient Educ Couns. 2018 Feb;101(2):340-345. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.07.015. Epub 2017 Jul 23.
2
"I Am Uncertain About What My Uncertainty Even Is": Men's Uncertainty and Information Management of Their BRCA-Related Cancer Risks.“我甚至不确定我的不确定性是什么”:男性对其与BRCA相关的癌症风险的不确定性及信息管理
J Genet Couns. 2018 Dec;27(6):1417-1427. doi: 10.1007/s10897-018-0276-y. Epub 2018 Jul 3.
3
Expectations versus reality: The impact of men's expectancy violations in conversations with healthcare providers about BRCA-related cancer risks.期望与现实:男性在与医疗保健提供者就 BRCA 相关癌症风险进行交谈时的期望违背对其产生的影响。
Patient Educ Couns. 2019 Sep;102(9):1650-1655. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.04.010. Epub 2019 Apr 6.
4
Engaging Men With BRCA-Related Cancer Risks: Practical Advice for BRCA Risk Management From Male Stakeholders.参与具有 BRCA 相关癌症风险的男性:来自男性利益相关者的 BRCA 风险管理实用建议。
Am J Mens Health. 2020 May-Jun;14(3):1557988320924932. doi: 10.1177/1557988320924932.
5
Men's and Women's Approaches to Disclosure About BRCA-Related Cancer Risks and Family Planning Decision-Making.男性和女性对 BRCA 相关癌症风险和生育计划决策的披露方式。
Qual Health Res. 2018 Dec;28(14):2155-2168. doi: 10.1177/1049732318788377. Epub 2018 Jul 27.
6
"How do we rally around the one who was positive?" Familial uncertainty management in the context of men managing BRCA-related cancer risks.我们如何团结那个阳性患者?男性管理 BRCA 相关癌症风险背景下的家庭不确定性管理。
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Dec;242:112592. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112592. Epub 2019 Oct 11.
7
Within-Gender Differences in Medical Decision Making Among Male Carriers of the BRCA Genetic Mutation for Hereditary Breast Cancer.遗传性乳腺癌BRCA基因突变男性携带者在医疗决策中的性别内差异
Am J Mens Health. 2017 Sep;11(5):1444-1459. doi: 10.1177/1557988315610806. Epub 2015 Oct 14.
8
'What men don't know can hurt women's health': a qualitative study of the barriers to and opportunities for men's involvement in maternal healthcare in Ghana.“男性所不知之事会损害女性健康”:加纳男性参与孕产妇保健的障碍与机遇的定性研究
Reprod Health. 2015 Oct 10;12:93. doi: 10.1186/s12978-015-0083-y.
9
Coping response and family communication of cancer risk in men harboring a BRCA mutation: A mixed methods study.男性携带 BRCA 突变的应对反应和家庭沟通:一项混合方法研究。
Psychooncology. 2022 Mar;31(3):486-495. doi: 10.1002/pon.5831. Epub 2021 Sep 28.
10
BRCAPRO 6.0 Model Validation in Male Patients Presenting for BRCA Testing.BRCAPRO 6.0模型在接受BRCA检测的男性患者中的验证
Oncologist. 2015 Jun;20(6):593-7. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2014-0425. Epub 2015 May 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychosocial outcomes of risk-adapted prevention for prostate cancer predisposition: study protocol for a longitudinal observational mixed-methods study.前列腺癌易感性风险适应性预防的心理社会结果:一项纵向观察性混合方法研究的研究方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 20;15(7):e103679. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103679.
2
BRCA1, BRCA2, and Associated Cancer Risks and Management for Male Patients: A Review.BRCA1、BRCA2 及相关男性患者的癌症风险和管理:综述。
JAMA Oncol. 2024 Sep 1;10(9):1272-1281. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.2185.
3
Injunctive social norms and perceived message tailoring are associated with health information seeking.
强制性社会规范和感知的信息定制与健康信息搜索相关。
J Behav Med. 2024 Feb;47(1):1-14. doi: 10.1007/s10865-023-00413-x. Epub 2023 Apr 29.
4
Sharing genetic test results with family members of BRCA, PALB2, CHEK2, and ATM carriers.与 BRCA、PALB2、CHEK2 和 ATM 携带者的家庭成员共享基因检测结果。
Patient Educ Couns. 2021 Apr;104(4):720-725. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.12.019. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
5
Practical Considerations and Challenges for Germline Genetic Testing in Patients With Prostate Cancer: Recommendations From the Germline Genetics Working Group of the PCCTC.前列腺癌患者种系基因检测的实际考虑和挑战:来自 PCCTC 种系遗传学工作组的建议。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2020 Dec;16(12):811-819. doi: 10.1200/OP.20.00431. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
6
Engaging Men With BRCA-Related Cancer Risks: Practical Advice for BRCA Risk Management From Male Stakeholders.参与具有 BRCA 相关癌症风险的男性:来自男性利益相关者的 BRCA 风险管理实用建议。
Am J Mens Health. 2020 May-Jun;14(3):1557988320924932. doi: 10.1177/1557988320924932.
7
The Genetic Education for Men (GEM) Trial: Development of Web-Based Education for Untested Men in BRCA1/2-Positive Families.男性遗传教育(GEM)试验:为 BRCA1/2 阳性家族中未接受测试的男性开发基于网络的教育
J Cancer Educ. 2021 Feb;36(1):72-84. doi: 10.1007/s13187-019-01599-y.
8
"I Am Uncertain About What My Uncertainty Even Is": Men's Uncertainty and Information Management of Their BRCA-Related Cancer Risks.“我甚至不确定我的不确定性是什么”:男性对其与BRCA相关的癌症风险的不确定性及信息管理
J Genet Couns. 2018 Dec;27(6):1417-1427. doi: 10.1007/s10897-018-0276-y. Epub 2018 Jul 3.