• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在线预约初级保健预约:基于健康保险的可用性差异。

Scheduling primary care appointments online: Differences in availability based on health insurance.

机构信息

Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, PCAM 14S-176, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.

School of Engineering/College of Arts, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

出版信息

Healthc (Amst). 2018 Sep;6(3):186-190. doi: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2017.07.002. Epub 2017 Jul 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.hjdsi.2017.07.002
PMID:28757308
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Digital platforms that allow patients to go online or use smartphone applications to view and schedule physician appointments have not been well evaluated.

METHODS

We conducted systematic searches for primary care physician appointments in 20 cities using ZocDoc, an online appointment scheduling platform. Availability was determined for three insurance types (self-pay, Medicare, and Medicaid) in states with and without Medicaid expansion. We collected data on physician characteristics, number of appointments available, and distance to clinics.

RESULTS

The sample comprised 4150 physician observations across 17 states. Overall, the mean distance to clinic was 8.9 miles (SD: 8.4 miles), mean total number of appointments available within 3 days for the 10 closest physicians was 20.1 (SD: 27.1), and the mean number of physicians available within 5 miles was 5.4 (SD: 6.6). There were no differences in physician characteristics by insurance type. Access to appointments did not differ between Medicare and self-pay. However, compared to self-pay, appointments for Medicaid were further away (Mean difference in miles: 5.4, P < 0.001), and there were fewer physicians available within 5 miles (Mean difference in # of physicians: -4.9, P < 0.001). States that did not adopt Medicaid expansion had fewer appointments within proximity, but this differed similarly across insurance types.

CONCLUSIONS

There were a substantial number of available appointments at close distances. However, Medicaid patients had less access to appointments within proximity than self-pay or Medicare patients.

摘要

背景

允许患者在线或使用智能手机应用程序查看和预约医生的数字平台尚未得到充分评估。

方法

我们使用在线预约平台 ZocDoc 在 20 个城市对初级保健医生预约进行了系统搜索。在有和没有医疗补助扩张的州,我们确定了三种保险类型(自付、医疗保险和医疗补助)的可用性。我们收集了有关医生特征、可用预约数量和诊所距离的数据。

结果

样本包括来自 17 个州的 4150 名医生观察结果。总体而言,诊所的平均距离为 8.9 英里(SD:8.4 英里),10 名最近医生的 3 天内可用预约总数的平均值为 20.1(SD:27.1),而 5 英里内可用医生的平均数量为 5.4(SD:6.6)。不同保险类型的医生特征没有差异。医疗保险和自付之间的预约机会没有差异。然而,与自付相比,医疗补助的预约距离更远(英里数平均差异:5.4,P < 0.001),5 英里内可用的医生数量也更少(医生数量平均差异:-4.9,P < 0.001)。没有采用医疗补助扩张的州,附近的预约数量较少,但这在不同的保险类型中也类似。

结论

有相当数量的预约可在近距离进行。然而,与自付或医疗保险患者相比,医疗补助患者预约的可及性较低。

相似文献

1
Scheduling primary care appointments online: Differences in availability based on health insurance.在线预约初级保健预约:基于健康保险的可用性差异。
Healthc (Amst). 2018 Sep;6(3):186-190. doi: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2017.07.002. Epub 2017 Jul 27.
2
The effect of insurance type on trauma patient access to psychiatric care under the Affordable Care Act.《平价医疗法案》下保险类型对创伤患者获得精神科护理的影响。
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2017 Mar-Apr;45:19-24. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2016.12.006. Epub 2016 Dec 18.
3
Medicaid Patients Have Greater Difficulty Scheduling Health Care Appointments Compared With Private Insurance Patients: A Meta-Analysis.与私人保险患者相比,医疗补助计划患者在安排医疗预约方面困难更大:一项荟萃分析。
Inquiry. 2019 Jan-Dec;56:46958019838118. doi: 10.1177/0046958019838118.
4
Primary Care Access to New Patient Appointments for California Medicaid Enrollees: A Simulated Patient Study.加利福尼亚州医疗补助计划参保者新患者预约的初级保健机会:一项模拟患者研究。
Ann Fam Med. 2020 May;18(3):210-217. doi: 10.1370/afm.2502.
5
Insurance Acceptance, Appointment Wait Time, and Dermatologist Access Across Practice Types in the US.美国不同类型医疗机构的保险接受情况、预约等待时间和皮肤科医生资源分布
JAMA Dermatol. 2021 Feb 1;157(2):181-188. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2020.5173.
6
The Effect of Insurance Type on Patient Access to Carpal Tunnel Release Under the Affordable Care Act.《平价医疗法案》下保险类型对患者接受腕管松解术的影响
J Hand Surg Am. 2016 Apr;41(4):503-509.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.01.007. Epub 2016 Feb 20.
7
Impact of Alternative Payment Methodology on Primary Care Visits and Scheduling.替代支付方式对初级保健就诊和预约的影响。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2019 Jul-Aug;32(4):539-549. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2019.04.180368.
8
Rural Ambulatory Access for Semi-Urgent Care and the Relationship of Distance to an Emergency Department.农村地区半紧急护理的门诊就医机会以及与急诊科的距离关系。
West J Emerg Med. 2015 Jul;16(4):594-9. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2015.4.25485. Epub 2015 Jun 24.
9
Primary Care Appointments for Medicaid Beneficiaries With Advanced Practitioners.初级保健预约:高级从业者为医疗补助受益人提供的服务。
Ann Fam Med. 2019 Jul;17(4):363-366. doi: 10.1370/afm.2399.
10
Access points for the underserved: primary care appointment availability at federally qualified health centers in 10 States.为服务不足人群提供的接入点:10个州联邦合格健康中心的初级保健预约服务可及性
Med Care. 2014 Sep;52(9):818-25. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000184.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficient patient care in the digital age: Online appointment scheduling in an ophthalmology practice.数字时代的高效患者护理:眼科诊所的在线预约安排
Digit Health. 2024 Oct 18;10:20552076241287083. doi: 10.1177/20552076241287083. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
2
Patient Opportunities to Self-Schedule in a Large Multisite, Multispecialty Medical Practice: Program Description and Uptake of 7 Unique Processes for Patients to Successfully Self-Schedule (and Reschedule) Their Medical Appointments.大型多地点、多专科医疗实践中患者自我预约的机会:项目描述以及患者成功自我预约(和重新预约)医疗预约的7个独特流程的采用情况
Health Serv Res Manag Epidemiol. 2024 Aug 23;11:23333928241271933. doi: 10.1177/23333928241271933. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
3
Barriers and Facilitators to Automated Self-Scheduling: Consensus from a Delphi Panel of Key Stakeholders.自动化自助排班的障碍和促进因素:来自关键利益相关者德尔菲小组的共识。
Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2022 Jan 1;19(1):1m. eCollection 2022 Winter.
4
Telehealth and Artificial Intelligence Insights into Healthcare during the COVID-19 Pandemic.远程医疗与人工智能:新冠疫情期间对医疗保健的洞察
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Feb 18;10(2):385. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10020385.
5
Barriers to and Facilitators of Automated Patient Self-scheduling for Health Care Organizations: Scoping Review.医疗机构中患者自助预约的障碍和促进因素:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jan 11;24(1):e28323. doi: 10.2196/28323.
6
Assimilation of Medical Appointment Scheduling Systems and Their Impact on the Accessibility of Primary Care: Mixed Methods Study.医疗预约安排系统的整合及其对初级保健可及性的影响:混合方法研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2021 Nov 16;9(11):e30485. doi: 10.2196/30485.
7
Impact of Web-Based Self-Scheduling on Finalization of Well-Child Appointments in a Primary Care Setting: Retrospective Comparison Study.基于网络的自我排班对基层医疗环境中儿童健康检查预约完成情况的影响:回顾性比较研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2021 Mar 18;9(3):e23450. doi: 10.2196/23450.