• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

筋膜闭合技术的差异是否会影响术后疼痛?

Does the Difference in Fascial Closure Technique Affect Postoperative Pain?

作者信息

Lyapis Anna, Ulrich Amanda, LaMonica Rachel, Kuo Chia-Ling, Kaye Leah, Luciano Danielle

机构信息

Obstetrics & Gynecology, Fremont, California.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Connecticut, Farmington, Connecticut.

出版信息

J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017 Nov-Dec;24(7):1190-1194. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.07.020. Epub 2017 Jul 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.jmig.2017.07.020
PMID:28757438
Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To compare postoperative incisional pain on postoperative days (PODs) 1 and 14 when using a fascial closure device (FCD) versus a traditional fascial closure (TFC) of the 12-mm upper quadrant port during robotic surgery. Time required to close the incision was also compared.

DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial (Canadian Task Force classification I).

SETTING

Two academic affiliated hospitals, The Hospital of Central Connecticut and The University of Connecticut.

PATIENTS

Women undergoing robotic surgery for benign indications by minimally invasive gynecologists at our institutions between November 2012 and October 2014 were enrolled in the study at their preoperative visit.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomized to either an FCD or TFC immediately before closure of the fascial incision. Pain score using a 10-point analog pain scale was recorded on POD 1 and POD 14. Time to close the fascial incision, length of surgery, and body mass index were also recorded.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Sixty-seven patients were enrolled, and 65 were randomized at the time of the fascial closure, whereas 2 enrolled patients converted to laparotomy. Statistical analysis demonstrated that pain scores differed by fascial closure technique. Mean pain scores on POD 1 were 3.43 ± 2.48 and 2.06 ± 2.03 for the FCD and TFC, respectively (p = .028). On POD 14 the mean pain scores were 1.97 ± 2.48 and .83 ± 1.42 for the FCD and TFC, respectively (p = .102). Times to close fascia were 106.5 ± 102.28 seconds and 141.97 ± 102.85 seconds for the FCD and TFC, respectively (p = .138).

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates that at POD 1 the use of the fascia closure device results in higher pain scores without a significant difference in closure time.

摘要

研究目的

比较机器人手术中使用筋膜闭合装置(FCD)与传统筋膜闭合(TFC)关闭12毫米上象限端口时术后第1天和第14天的切口疼痛情况。同时比较关闭切口所需的时间。

设计

随机对照试验(加拿大工作组分类I级)。

地点

两家学术附属医院,即中央康涅狄格医院和康涅狄格大学医院。

患者

2012年11月至2014年10月期间,在我们机构由微创妇科医生为良性指征进行机器人手术的女性患者在术前访视时被纳入研究。

干预措施

在筋膜切口闭合前,患者被随机分为FCD组或TFC组。使用10分模拟疼痛量表记录术后第1天和第14天的疼痛评分。还记录了关闭筋膜切口的时间、手术时长和体重指数。

测量与主要结果

共纳入67例患者,65例在筋膜闭合时被随机分组,另外2例纳入患者转为开腹手术。统计分析表明,疼痛评分因筋膜闭合技术而异。FCD组和TFC组术后第1天的平均疼痛评分分别为3.43±2.48和2.06±2.03(p = 0.028)。术后第14天,FCD组和TFC组的平均疼痛评分分别为1.97±2.48和0.83±1.42(p = 0 .102)。FCD组和TFC组关闭筋膜的时间分别为106.5±102.28秒和141.97±102.85秒(p = 0.138)。

结论

我们的研究表明,在术后第1天,使用筋膜闭合装置会导致更高的疼痛评分,而闭合时间无显著差异。

相似文献

1
Does the Difference in Fascial Closure Technique Affect Postoperative Pain?筋膜闭合技术的差异是否会影响术后疼痛?
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017 Nov-Dec;24(7):1190-1194. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.07.020. Epub 2017 Jul 27.
2
Interrupted versus continuous fascial closure in patients undergoing emergent laparotomy: A randomized controlled trial.间断缝合与连续缝合在急诊剖腹术中的应用:一项随机对照试验。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018 Sep;85(3):459-465. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001970.
3
Comparative Study of Postoperative Pain between Maylard Incision and Pfannenstiel Incision in Gynecologic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.妇科手术中Maylard切口与Pfannenstiel切口术后疼痛的比较研究:一项随机对照试验
J Med Assoc Thai. 2016 Jul;99 Suppl 4:S16-22.
4
Abdominal wall nerve injury during laparoscopic gynecologic surgery: incidence, risk factors, and treatment outcomes.腹腔镜妇科手术中腹壁神经损伤:发生率、危险因素和治疗结果。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2012 Jul-Aug;19(4):448-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2012.03.009. Epub 2012 May 3.
5
Clavicle pain and reduction of incisional and fascial pain after posterior cervical surgery.颈椎后路手术后锁骨疼痛及切口和筋膜疼痛减轻
J Neurosurg Spine. 2015 Dec;23(6):684-9. doi: 10.3171/2015.2.SPINE141118. Epub 2015 Aug 21.
6
Cosmetic Appearance of Port-site Scars 1 Year After Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Sacrocolpopexy: A Supplementary Study of the ACCESS Clinical Trial.腹腔镜与机器人骶骨阴道固定术后1年腹部穿刺孔瘢痕的外观:ACCESS临床试验的补充研究
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016 Sep-Oct;23(6):917-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.05.001. Epub 2016 May 12.
7
Objective analysis of the accuracy and efficacy of a novel fascial closure device.新型筋膜闭合装置准确性和有效性的客观分析
Surg Innov. 2008 Dec;15(4):307-11. doi: 10.1177/1553350608327168.
8
Postoperative pain medication requirements in patients undergoing computer-assisted (“Robotic”) and standard laparoscopic procedures for newly diagnosed endometrial cancer.接受计算机辅助(“机器人”)和标准腹腔镜手术治疗新发子宫内膜癌患者的术后疼痛药物需求。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Oct;20(11):3561-7. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-3064-9.
9
Wound Infiltration With Extended-Release Versus Short-Acting Bupivacaine Before Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.腹腔镜子宫切除术前行长效与短效布比卡因伤口浸润的随机对照试验
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017 Feb;24(2):286-292. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.11.002. Epub 2016 Nov 14.
10
Gynecologic robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: prospective analysis of feasibility, safety, and technique.妇科机器人腹腔镜单孔手术:可行性、安全性和技术的前瞻性分析。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Feb;212(2):179.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.07.057. Epub 2014 Aug 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Fascial Closure vs. Non-closure of Right Working Port Sites in Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.腹腔镜减肥手术中右侧工作端口部位的筋膜缝合与不缝合:一项随机临床试验
Obes Surg. 2025 May 23. doi: 10.1007/s11695-025-07917-2.