De Ceglia Francesco Paolo
Bull Hist Med. 2017;91(2):391-419. doi: 10.1353/bhm.2017.0031.
In the late Middle Ages, rumors began to spread throughout Europe regarding blood miracles associated with the relics of martyrs. Centuries-old blood, pulverized or solidified and black in color, was said to return to its original bright red color, or else to liquefy or bubble under certain circumstances or on certain dates in the liturgical calendar. With the Reformation, in Protestant countries most of these relics were either destroyed or forgotten. In Catholic countries, on the contrary, blood miracles multiplied, reaching a peak between the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. This article reconstructs the debate that sprang up in eighteenth-century Europe over the blood of Saint Januarius and the attempts made to disprove its miraculous properties, often not in written works, but by staging highly theatrical demonstrations. It examines the way in which, with phenomena as complex as miracles, the activities of testing alleged facts, creating elucidative models, and staging imitations intertwined over the centuries, often overlapping and becoming confused.
在中世纪晚期,关于殉道者遗物所关联的血液奇迹的谣言开始在欧洲传播开来。据说,历经数百年的血液,已粉碎或凝固且呈黑色,会恢复其原本的鲜红色,或者在某些情况下,即在教会年历的特定日期,会液化或冒泡。随着宗教改革,在新教国家,这些遗物大多被毁坏或遗忘。相反,在天主教国家,血液奇迹却成倍增加,在17世纪至18世纪达到顶峰。本文重构了18世纪欧洲围绕圣雅努阿里乌斯之血展开的争论,以及人们为反驳其神奇特性所做的尝试,这些尝试往往并非通过书面作品,而是通过极具戏剧性的演示来进行。它审视了几个世纪以来,面对像奇迹这样复杂的现象,检验所谓事实、创建阐释模型以及进行模仿的活动是如何相互交织的,常常相互重叠且变得混乱不堪。