Lotfi Saeid, Yazdanirad Saeid, Pourabdiyan Siyamak, Hassanzadeh Akbar, Lotfi Aliakbar
Department of Occupational Health Engineering, School of Health, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Department of Occupational Health Engineering, School of Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Int J Prev Med. 2017 Jul 4;8:52. doi: 10.4103/ijpvm.IJPVM_313_16. eCollection 2017.
This study aimed to assess driving behavior of Iranian drivers based on their coping styles (problem-oriented, emotion-oriented, and avoiding).
This study was conducted on 610 drivers divided into four different groups. The drivers' behaviors and coping styles were evaluated using driver behavior questionnaire (DBQ) and coping inventory for stressful situations.
The results showed a significant difference among the three coping styles regarding the mean scores of DBQ dimensions ( < 0.001). In addition, the emotion-oriented drivers obtained higher mean scores compared to those with other coping styles.
It can be concluded that emotion-oriented drivers were more susceptible to crashes compared to those with problem-solving and avoidance coping styles.
本研究旨在根据伊朗驾驶员的应对方式（问题导向型、情绪导向型和回避型）评估其驾驶行为。
本研究对610名驾驶员进行，分为四个不同组。使用驾驶员行为问卷（DBQ）和应激情况应对量表评估驾驶员的行为和应对方式。
结果显示，三种应对方式在DBQ维度平均得分上存在显著差异（<0.001）。此外，与其他应对方式的驾驶员相比，情绪导向型驾驶员的平均得分更高。
可以得出结论，与采用解决问题和回避应对方式的驾驶员相比，情绪导向型驾驶员更容易发生撞车事故。
