Lee Jong-Bin
Department of Periodontology, School of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Case Rep Dent. 2017;2017:9640517. doi: 10.1155/2017/9640517. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
Dental implant has been restoring the function and esthetics lost from missing tooth. However, biomechanical implant complications are the major cause of failing implants. Therefore, implant removal is one of the indispensable dental treatments. The 70-year-old male and 66-year-old female who had discomfort on posterior implants region came to Department of Periodontology. Conventional method using trephine bur and the new, nontraumatic method using a fixture removal kit were used for implant removal, respectively. Two different methods are commonly used for implant removal. Each has advantages and disadvantages; thus, the applied surgical method must consider a patient's intraoral condition, posttreatment plan, and the level of surgeon's skill and experience. In conclusion, strategically executing the most optimal implant removal method plays a pivotal role in maximizing the success rate of implant reinstallation that follows afterwards.
牙种植体一直在恢复因牙齿缺失而丧失的功能和美观。然而，生物力学种植体并发症是种植体失败的主要原因。因此，种植体取出是必不可少的牙科治疗之一。一名70岁男性和一名66岁女性因后牙种植区不适来到牙周病科。分别采用使用环钻的传统方法和使用种植体取出套件的新型无创方法进行种植体取出。通常有两种不同的方法用于种植体取出。每种方法都有优缺点；因此，应用的手术方法必须考虑患者的口腔状况、治疗后计划以及外科医生的技术水平和经验。总之，策略性地执行最优化的种植体取出方法对于最大化后续种植体重置的成功率起着关键作用。
