Suppr超能文献

关于骨整合种植体取出的系统综述:更新。

A systematic review on removal of osseointegrated implants: un update.

机构信息

Unit of Prosthodontics, Department of Innovative Technologies in Medicine and Dentistry, University "G. d'Annunzio" of Chieti- Pescara, 66100, Chieti, Italy.

Electron Microscopy Laboratory, University "G. d'Annunzio" of Chieti-Pescara, 66100, Chieti, Italy.

出版信息

BMC Oral Health. 2023 Oct 13;23(1):756. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03438-5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Today dental implants represent an effective therapy in case of partial or total edentulism, with an excellent success rate. Despite the results obtained, there may be biological or mechanical complications during the therapy, which lead to the loss of the implant. This systematic review aims to evaluate the current state of the art in the literature on techniques used for the removal of dental implants. Various aspects will be analyzed, such as the success of the technique, any complications, and the advantages and disadvantages of their use.

METHODS

Two reviewers conducted a literature analysis (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science) of the last 20 years (2003-2023). The main criterion analyzed was the success of the technique, while secondary outcomes such as complications and risks of the technique were also analyzed. 258 articles were identified in the various search databases. 42 eligible articles were subsequently identified after an article screening. Only 18 full texts were subsequently included in the review.

RESULTS

A total of 18 articles were selected and 1142 implants and 595 patients were included. The main techniques used were the Counter-Torque Ratchet Technique (CTRT), Piezoelectric bone surgery (PBS), trephine drills, carbide burs, Erbium, Chromium, Yttrium, Scandium, Gallium, Garnett (Er:Cr:YSGG) laser and carbon dioxide (CO) laser. Combined uses of techniques have been identified such as: PBS and trephine burs or carbide burs, trephine burs with the use of a 3d-printed guide, CTRT and trephine burs. The technique with the highest success rate, less morbidity for the patient, and less removal of bone appears to be the CTRT.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of conservative techniques, especially CTRT, in bone removal is useful to allow for immediate implant placement in the removal area. However, further studies with a high sample size are needed to be performed on all techniques, particularly new randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that allow for the analysis of the success of alternative techniques such as Laser and Piezosurgery, which appear to be very promising.

摘要

背景

如今,种植牙在部分或完全缺牙的情况下是一种有效的治疗方法,成功率非常高。尽管取得了这些成果,但在治疗过程中仍可能会出现生物或机械并发症,从而导致种植体丢失。本系统综述旨在评估目前关于种植牙取出技术的文献现状。将分析各种方面,如技术的成功率、任何并发症以及使用这些技术的优缺点。

方法

两位审查员对过去 20 年(2003-2023 年)的文献进行了分析(PubMed、Embase、Web of Science)。分析的主要标准是技术的成功率,同时还分析了次要结果,如技术的并发症和风险。在各个搜索数据库中共发现 258 篇文章。经过筛选后,随后确定了 42 篇符合条件的文章。最后,只有 18 篇全文被纳入综述。

结果

共选择了 18 篇文章,共纳入 1142 个种植体和 595 名患者。主要使用的技术是反向扭矩棘轮技术(CTRT)、压电骨手术(PBS)、环钻、碳化硅车针、铒铬钇钪石榴石(Er:Cr:YSGG)激光和二氧化碳(CO)激光。还确定了一些技术的联合使用,如:PBS 和环钻或碳化硅车针、带 3D 打印导向器的环钻、CTRT 和环钻。成功率最高、对患者发病率最低、骨切除量最少的技术似乎是 CTRT。

结论

在骨切除中使用保守技术,特别是 CTRT,对于在切除区域立即植入种植体是有用的。然而,需要对所有技术进行进一步的研究,样本量越大越好,特别是需要新的随机对照试验(RCT),以便分析替代技术的成功率,如激光和压电手术,这些技术似乎非常有前景。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71dd/10576342/a06ef3baee92/12903_2023_3438_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验