• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种自我报告结局指标的最小可检测变化及重测信度:流行病学研究中心抑郁量表、一般自我效能量表和12项一般健康问卷的结果

Smallest detectable change and test-retest reliability of a self-reported outcome measure: Results of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, General Self-Efficacy Scale, and 12-item General Health Questionnaire.

作者信息

Ohno Shotaro, Takahashi Kana, Inoue Aimi, Takada Koki, Ishihara Yoshiaki, Tanigawa Masaru, Hirao Kazuki

机构信息

Department of Occupational Therapy, Kibi International University, Takahashi, Okayama, Japan.

出版信息

J Eval Clin Pract. 2017 Dec;23(6):1348-1354. doi: 10.1111/jep.12795. Epub 2017 Jul 30.

DOI:10.1111/jep.12795
PMID:28758322
Abstract

RATIONALE, AIMS, AND OBJECTIVES: This study aims to examine the smallest detectable change (SDC) and test-retest reliability of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES), and 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12).

METHOD

We tested 154 young adults at baseline and 2 weeks later. We calculated the intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) for test-retest reliability with a two-way random effects model for agreement. We then calculated the standard error of measurement (SEM) for agreement using the ICC formula. The SEM for agreement was used to calculate SDC values at the individual level (SDC ) and group level (SDC ).

RESULTS

The study participants included 137 young adults. The ICCs for all self-reported outcome measurement scales exceeded 0.70. The SEM of CES-D was 3.64, leading to an SDC of 10.10 points and SDC of 0.86 points. The SEM of GSES was 1.56, leading to an SDC of 4.33 points and SDC of 0.37 points. The SEM of GHQ-12 with bimodal scoring was 1.47, leading to an SDC of 4.06 points and SDC of 0.35 points. The SEM of GHQ-12 with Likert scoring was 2.44, leading to an SDC of 6.76 points and SDC of 0.58 points.

CONCLUSION

To confirm that the change was not a result of measurement error, a score of self-reported outcome measurement scales would need to change by an amount greater than these SDC values. This has important implications for clinicians and epidemiologists when assessing outcomes.

摘要

原理、目的和目标:本研究旨在检验流行病学研究中心抑郁量表(CES-D)、一般自我效能量表(GSES)和12项一般健康问卷(GHQ-12)的最小可检测变化(SDC)和重测信度。

方法

我们在基线时对154名年轻成年人进行了测试,并在2周后再次测试。我们使用双向随机效应一致性模型计算重测信度的组内相关系数(ICC)。然后,我们使用ICC公式计算一致性测量的标准误(SEM)。一致性SEM用于计算个体水平(SDC)和组水平(SDC)的SDC值。

结果

研究参与者包括137名年轻成年人。所有自我报告结局测量量表的ICC均超过0.70。CES-D的SEM为3.64,导致SDC为10.10分,SDC为0.86分。GSES的SEM为1.56,导致SDC为4.33分,SDC为0.37分。双峰计分的GHQ-12的SEM为1.47,导致SDC为4.06分,SDC为0.35分。李克特计分的GHQ-12的SEM为2.44,导致SDC为6.76分,SDC为0.58分。

结论

为了确认变化不是测量误差的结果,自我报告结局测量量表的分数需要改变大于这些SDC值的量。这对临床医生和流行病学家评估结局具有重要意义。

相似文献

1
Smallest detectable change and test-retest reliability of a self-reported outcome measure: Results of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, General Self-Efficacy Scale, and 12-item General Health Questionnaire.一种自我报告结局指标的最小可检测变化及重测信度:流行病学研究中心抑郁量表、一般自我效能量表和12项一般健康问卷的结果
J Eval Clin Pract. 2017 Dec;23(6):1348-1354. doi: 10.1111/jep.12795. Epub 2017 Jul 30.
2
Measurement error in the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale: results from a general adult population in Japan.Liebowitz 社交焦虑量表的测量误差:来自日本普通成年人群的结果。
Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract. 2018 Nov;22(4):289-295. doi: 10.1080/13651501.2018.1426772. Epub 2018 Jan 17.
3
Assessing the Smallest Detectable Change of the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale Score in an Adult Population in Japan.评估日本成年人群中凯斯勒心理困扰量表得分的最小可检测变化。
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2023 Jul 13;16:2647-2654. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S417446. eCollection 2023.
4
The Swedish version of OMAS is a reliable and valid outcome measure for patients with ankle fractures.瑞典语版的 OMAS 是一种可靠且有效的踝关节骨折患者的结局测量工具。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013 Mar 25;14:109. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-14-109.
5
Reliability and aspects of validity of the Swedish version of self-efficacy for exercise scale for patients with chronic pain.慢性疼痛患者运动自我效能量表瑞典语版本的信度及效度方面
Physiother Theory Pract. 2023 Jan;39(1):163-173. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2021.1999356. Epub 2021 Nov 11.
6
Establishing test-retest reliability and the smallest detectable change of FACE-Q Aesthetic Module scales.评估 FACE-Q 美学模块量表重测信度和最小可检测变化值。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2024 Aug;95:231-238. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2024.06.002. Epub 2024 Jun 7.
7
Reliability and structural validity of the Danish Short 4-item version of the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale for Children (CES-DC4) in adolescents.丹麦短版儿童流行病学研究中心抑郁量表 4 项版本(CES-DC4)在青少年中可靠性和结构有效性。
BMC Pediatr. 2022 Jul 2;22(1):388. doi: 10.1186/s12887-022-03451-7.
8
Measurement properties of the Arm Function in Multiple Sclerosis Questionnaire (AMSQ): a study based on Classical Test Theory.多发性硬化症问卷中手臂功能的测量属性:一项基于经典测试理论的研究。
Disabil Rehabil. 2017 Oct;39(20):2097-2104. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2016.1213898. Epub 2016 Sep 24.
9
Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale-Revised in patients with cancer: A cross-sectional study.中文版流行病学研究抑郁量表修订版在癌症患者中的心理计量特性:一项横断面研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2019 Sep;97:14-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.04.008. Epub 2019 Apr 19.
10
Assessing the test-retest reliability and smallest detectable change of the Haemophilia Activities List.评估血友病活动清单的重测信度和最小可检测变化。
Haemophilia. 2021 Jan;27(1):108-112. doi: 10.1111/hae.14226. Epub 2020 Dec 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Cardiovascular training for fatigue in people with cancer.针对癌症患者疲劳问题的心血管训练
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Feb 20;2(2):CD015517. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015517.
2
Resistance training for fatigue in people with cancer.癌症患者的抗疲劳阻力训练。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 28;11(11):CD015518. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015518.
3
Are web-based stress management interventions effective as an indirect treatment for depression? An individual participant data meta-analysis of six randomised trials.
基于网络的压力管理干预措施是否可以作为抑郁症的间接治疗方法有效?六项随机试验的个体参与者数据荟萃分析。
BMJ Ment Health. 2024 Feb 13;27(1):e300846. doi: 10.1136/bmjment-2023-300846.
4
The use of 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) in Ukrainian refugees: translation and validation study of the Ukrainian version.12 项一般健康问卷(GHQ-12)在乌克兰难民中的使用:乌克兰语版本的翻译和验证研究。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2024 Jan 13;22(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12955-024-02226-1.
5
Assessing the Smallest Detectable Change of the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale Score in an Adult Population in Japan.评估日本成年人群中凯斯勒心理困扰量表得分的最小可检测变化。
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2023 Jul 13;16:2647-2654. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S417446. eCollection 2023.
6
Depression and anxiety in people with cognitive impairment and dementia during the COVID-19 pandemic: Analysis of the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing.认知障碍和痴呆患者在 COVID-19 大流行期间的抑郁和焦虑:英国老龄化纵向研究分析。
PLoS Med. 2023 Apr 24;20(4):e1004162. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004162. eCollection 2023 Apr.
7
Differences in Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 and Kessler Screening Scale for Psychological Distress Scores between Smartphone Version versus Paper Version Administration: Evidence of Equivalence.智能手机版与纸质版在流行病学研究抑郁量表、广泛性焦虑症-7 量表和凯斯勒心理困扰筛查量表评分方面的差异:等效性证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 8;20(6):4773. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20064773.
8
Delivering Personalized Recommendations to Support Caregivers of People Living With Dementia: Mixed Methods Study.提供个性化建议以支持痴呆症患者的照料者:混合方法研究
JMIR Aging. 2022 May 3;5(2):e35847. doi: 10.2196/35847.
9
Objective Job Demands of Oneself and One's Partner, and Depressive Symptoms. Evidence from a Nationally Representative Longitudinal Study.客观的自身工作要求和伴侣工作要求与抑郁症状。基于全国代表性纵向研究的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 1;18(23):12688. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182312688.
10
Measuring health-related quality of life in chronic headache: A comparative evaluation of the Chronic Headache Quality of Life Questionnaire and Headache Impact Test (HIT-6).测量慢性头痛患者的健康相关生活质量:慢性头痛生活质量问卷和头痛影响测试(HIT-6)的比较评估。
Cephalalgia. 2021 Sep;41(10):1100-1123. doi: 10.1177/03331024211006045. Epub 2021 May 4.