Suppr超能文献

一种自我报告结局指标的最小可检测变化及重测信度:流行病学研究中心抑郁量表、一般自我效能量表和12项一般健康问卷的结果

Smallest detectable change and test-retest reliability of a self-reported outcome measure: Results of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, General Self-Efficacy Scale, and 12-item General Health Questionnaire.

作者信息

Ohno Shotaro, Takahashi Kana, Inoue Aimi, Takada Koki, Ishihara Yoshiaki, Tanigawa Masaru, Hirao Kazuki

机构信息

Department of Occupational Therapy, Kibi International University, Takahashi, Okayama, Japan.

出版信息

J Eval Clin Pract. 2017 Dec;23(6):1348-1354. doi: 10.1111/jep.12795. Epub 2017 Jul 30.

Abstract

RATIONALE, AIMS, AND OBJECTIVES: This study aims to examine the smallest detectable change (SDC) and test-retest reliability of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES), and 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12).

METHOD

We tested 154 young adults at baseline and 2 weeks later. We calculated the intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) for test-retest reliability with a two-way random effects model for agreement. We then calculated the standard error of measurement (SEM) for agreement using the ICC formula. The SEM for agreement was used to calculate SDC values at the individual level (SDC ) and group level (SDC ).

RESULTS

The study participants included 137 young adults. The ICCs for all self-reported outcome measurement scales exceeded 0.70. The SEM of CES-D was 3.64, leading to an SDC of 10.10 points and SDC of 0.86 points. The SEM of GSES was 1.56, leading to an SDC of 4.33 points and SDC of 0.37 points. The SEM of GHQ-12 with bimodal scoring was 1.47, leading to an SDC of 4.06 points and SDC of 0.35 points. The SEM of GHQ-12 with Likert scoring was 2.44, leading to an SDC of 6.76 points and SDC of 0.58 points.

CONCLUSION

To confirm that the change was not a result of measurement error, a score of self-reported outcome measurement scales would need to change by an amount greater than these SDC values. This has important implications for clinicians and epidemiologists when assessing outcomes.

摘要

原理、目的和目标:本研究旨在检验流行病学研究中心抑郁量表(CES-D)、一般自我效能量表(GSES)和12项一般健康问卷(GHQ-12)的最小可检测变化(SDC)和重测信度。

方法

我们在基线时对154名年轻成年人进行了测试,并在2周后再次测试。我们使用双向随机效应一致性模型计算重测信度的组内相关系数(ICC)。然后,我们使用ICC公式计算一致性测量的标准误(SEM)。一致性SEM用于计算个体水平(SDC)和组水平(SDC)的SDC值。

结果

研究参与者包括137名年轻成年人。所有自我报告结局测量量表的ICC均超过0.70。CES-D的SEM为3.64,导致SDC为10.10分,SDC为0.86分。GSES的SEM为1.56,导致SDC为4.33分,SDC为0.37分。双峰计分的GHQ-12的SEM为1.47,导致SDC为4.06分,SDC为0.35分。李克特计分的GHQ-12的SEM为2.44,导致SDC为6.76分,SDC为0.58分。

结论

为了确认变化不是测量误差的结果,自我报告结局测量量表的分数需要改变大于这些SDC值的量。这对临床医生和流行病学家评估结局具有重要意义。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验