Suppr超能文献

丹麦短版儿童流行病学研究中心抑郁量表 4 项版本(CES-DC4)在青少年中可靠性和结构有效性。

Reliability and structural validity of the Danish Short 4-item version of the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale for Children (CES-DC4) in adolescents.

机构信息

Department of Occupational Medicine, University Research Clinic, Danish Ramazzini Centre, Goedstrup Hospital, Hospitalsparken 15, 7400, Herning, Denmark.

Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Bartholins Allé 2, 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark.

出版信息

BMC Pediatr. 2022 Jul 2;22(1):388. doi: 10.1186/s12887-022-03451-7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The 4-item version of the Center of Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-DC) is a self-reported questionnaire used to measure depressive symptoms in adolescents, but the psychometric properties of the scale have been tested to only a limited extent. The aim of this study was to examine the reliability and structural validity of the Danish CES-DC in 9 graders.

METHODS

Using a sample of 72 adolescents 15 to 17 years of age from five 9 grade classes, the reliability of the CES-DC was determined by a test-retest study at a 2-week interval. Descriptive statistics of the adolescents were presented, and internal consistency, structural validity, reliability, and agreement between tests were evaluated. The structural validity of the scale was tested by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and the sumscores of the test and retest were presented.

RESULTS

The estimated Cronbach's α was 0.61 (95% CI 0.50; 0.71). Inter-item and item-rest correlations indicated that one of the four items (item 20) did not fit well on the scale. CFA found a one-factor model suited for the scale, but the factor loadings indicated that item 20 contributed the least to measure the factor (0.29). Sum scores ranged from 0-9 within a possible interval of 0-12. There were no signs of systematic error of the scale. Limits of Agreement (-3.01; 3.79) were broad. The standard error of measurement (SEM = 1.25 point (95% CI.1.05; 1.47)) and intraclass correlation (ICC(2,1) = 0.60 (95% CI: 0.44; 0.73)) calculations showed low reliability of the CES-DC.

CONCLUSION

This study found low reliability of the CES-DC with low estimates of ICC and Cronbach's α. The CES-DC needs revision, and removal of item 20 and adding more items from the CES-DC should be considered.

摘要

背景

四项目版本的中心流行病学研究抑郁量表(CES-DC)是一种自我报告问卷,用于测量青少年的抑郁症状,但该量表的心理测量特性仅在有限的范围内进行了测试。本研究的目的是在 9 年级学生中检验丹麦 CES-DC 的信度和结构效度。

方法

使用来自五个 9 年级班级的 72 名 15 至 17 岁青少年的样本,通过 2 周间隔的测试-重测研究确定 CES-DC 的信度。呈现了青少年的描述性统计数据,并评估了内部一致性、结构效度、可靠性和测试之间的一致性。通过验证性因素分析(CFA)检验量表的结构效度,并呈现测试和重测的总分。

结果

估计的 Cronbach's α 为 0.61(95%CI 0.50;0.71)。项目间和项目-残差相关表明,四个项目中的一个(项目 20)在量表上拟合不佳。CFA 发现量表适合单因素模型,但因子负荷表明项目 20对测量因子的贡献最小(0.29)。总分范围为 0-9,可能的区间为 0-12。量表没有系统误差的迹象。界限(-3.01;3.79)较宽。测量标准误差(SEM=1.25 点(95%CI.1.05;1.47))和组内相关系数(ICC(2,1)=0.60(95%CI:0.44;0.73))计算表明 CES-DC 的可靠性低。

结论

本研究发现 CES-DC 的信度低,ICC 和 Cronbach's α 的估计值低。CES-DC 需要修订,应考虑删除项目 20 并从 CES-DC 添加更多项目。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fa5/9250219/3f7270bec853/12887_2022_3451_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验