• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Assessing the Smallest Detectable Change of the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale Score in an Adult Population in Japan.评估日本成年人群中凯斯勒心理困扰量表得分的最小可检测变化。
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2023 Jul 13;16:2647-2654. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S417446. eCollection 2023.
2
The Kessler psychological distress scale: translation and validation of an Arabic version.凯斯勒心理困扰量表:阿拉伯语版本的翻译与验证
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Oct 27;15(1):215. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0783-9.
3
Smallest detectable change and test-retest reliability of a self-reported outcome measure: Results of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, General Self-Efficacy Scale, and 12-item General Health Questionnaire.一种自我报告结局指标的最小可检测变化及重测信度:流行病学研究中心抑郁量表、一般自我效能量表和12项一般健康问卷的结果
J Eval Clin Pract. 2017 Dec;23(6):1348-1354. doi: 10.1111/jep.12795. Epub 2017 Jul 30.
4
Measurement error in the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale: results from a general adult population in Japan.Liebowitz 社交焦虑量表的测量误差:来自日本普通成年人群的结果。
Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract. 2018 Nov;22(4):289-295. doi: 10.1080/13651501.2018.1426772. Epub 2018 Jan 17.
5
The Psychometric Properties of the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K6) in an Epidemiological Sample of Canadian Youth.《加拿大青年流行病学样本中 Kessler 心理困扰量表(K6)的心理计量学特性》
Can J Psychiatry. 2019 Sep;64(9):647-657. doi: 10.1177/0706743718818414. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
6
Differences in Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 and Kessler Screening Scale for Psychological Distress Scores between Smartphone Version versus Paper Version Administration: Evidence of Equivalence.智能手机版与纸质版在流行病学研究抑郁量表、广泛性焦虑症-7 量表和凯斯勒心理困扰筛查量表评分方面的差异:等效性证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 8;20(6):4773. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20064773.
7
Mother-to-infant bonding failure and intimate partner violence during pregnancy as risk factors for father-to-infant bonding failure at 1 month postpartum: an adjunct study of the Japan Environment and Children's Study.母婴结合失败和妊娠期间亲密伴侣暴力是父亲在产后 1 个月与婴儿结合失败的风险因素:日本环境与儿童研究的辅助研究。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020 Aug;33(16):2789-2796. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2018.1560414. Epub 2019 Apr 15.
8
Maternal prenatal and postnatal psychological distress trajectories and impact on cognitive development in 4-year-old children: the Japan Environment and Children's Study.母亲产前和产后心理困扰轨迹及其对 4 岁儿童认知发展的影响:日本环境与儿童研究。
J Dev Orig Health Dis. 2023 Dec;14(6):781-794. doi: 10.1017/S2040174424000011. Epub 2024 Feb 8.
9
Psychological distress in post-partum women after non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in Japan.日本无创产前检测(NIPT)后产后女性的心理困扰
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2018 Jan;44(1):35-42. doi: 10.1111/jog.13483. Epub 2017 Oct 13.
10
Maternal prenatal psychological distress and motor/cognitive development in two-year-old offspring: The Japan Environment and Children's Study.母亲产前心理困扰与两岁幼儿运动/认知发育的关系:日本环境与儿童健康研究。
J Dev Orig Health Dis. 2023 Jun;14(3):389-401. doi: 10.1017/S2040174422000691. Epub 2023 Jan 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Novel insight into prediction model for sleep quality among college students: a LASSO-derived sleep evaluation.大学生睡眠质量预测模型的新见解:基于LASSO的睡眠评估
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Apr 25;16:1585732. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1585732. eCollection 2025.
2
Consistency as the Currency in Psychological Measures: A Reliability Generalization Meta-Analysis of Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K-10 and K-6).心理测量中的一致性作为衡量标准:凯斯勒心理困扰量表(K-10和K-6)的信度概括性元分析
Depress Anxiety. 2024 Oct 16;2024:3801950. doi: 10.1155/2024/3801950. eCollection 2024.
3
Dynamic analysis of the relationship between systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity and psychosocial support.系统性红斑狼疮疾病活动与心理社会支持关系的动态分析
Front Psychol. 2024 Aug 14;15:1433868. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1433868. eCollection 2024.
4
Pet Attachment and Anxiety and Depression in Middle-Aged and Older Women.中年及老年女性的宠物依恋与焦虑和抑郁
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Aug 1;7(8):e2424810. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.24810.

本文引用的文献

1
Differences in Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 and Kessler Screening Scale for Psychological Distress Scores between Smartphone Version versus Paper Version Administration: Evidence of Equivalence.智能手机版与纸质版在流行病学研究抑郁量表、广泛性焦虑症-7 量表和凯斯勒心理困扰筛查量表评分方面的差异:等效性证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 8;20(6):4773. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20064773.
2
Comparative Efficacy of Multiple Therapies for the Treatment of Patients With Subthreshold Depression: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.多种疗法治疗阈下抑郁症患者的疗效比较:系统评价与网状Meta分析
Front Behav Neurosci. 2021 Oct 8;15:755547. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2021.755547. eCollection 2021.
3
Factors contributing to psychological distress in the working population, with a special reference to gender difference.工作人群中导致心理困扰的因素,特别关注性别差异。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Mar 29;21(1):611. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10560-y.
4
Evaluating quality of life in frailty: applicability and clinimetric properties of the SarQoL questionnaire.评估衰弱患者的生活质量:SarQoL 问卷的适用性和临床计量学特性。
J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2021 Apr;12(2):319-330. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.12687. Epub 2021 Feb 28.
5
Effects of video viewing smartphone application intervention involving positive word stimulation in people with subthreshold depression: A pilot randomized controlled trial.视频观看智能手机应用程序干预对阈下抑郁人群的影响:一项先导随机对照试验。
J Affect Disord. 2021 Mar 1;282:74-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.12.104. Epub 2020 Dec 28.
6
Quality of life among district hospital nurses with multisite musculoskeletal symptoms in Vietnam.越南多部位肌肉骨骼症状地区医院护士的生活质量。
J Occup Health. 2020 Jan;62(1):e12161. doi: 10.1002/1348-9585.12161.
7
Internal consistency reliability, construct validity, and item response characteristics of the Kessler 6 scale among hospital nurses in Vietnam.越南医院护士 Kessler 6 量表的内部一致性信度、结构效度和项目反应特征。
PLoS One. 2020 May 21;15(5):e0233119. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233119. eCollection 2020.
8
Academic performance: A longitudinal study on the role of goal-directed rumination and psychological distress.学业表现:目标定向反刍和心理困扰的纵向研究
Anxiety Stress Coping. 2020 Sep;33(5):545-559. doi: 10.1080/10615806.2020.1763141. Epub 2020 May 12.
9
Transitional Employment and Psychological Distress: a Longitudinal Study.过渡性就业与心理困扰:一项纵向研究。
Psychiatr Q. 2020 Sep;91(3):735-747. doi: 10.1007/s11126-020-09739-0.
10
Sensitivity to change and minimal clinically important difference of the 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire (GAD-7).7 项广泛性焦虑障碍问卷(GAD-7)的变化敏感性和最小临床重要差异。
J Affect Disord. 2020 Mar 15;265:395-401. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.01.032. Epub 2020 Jan 15.

评估日本成年人群中凯斯勒心理困扰量表得分的最小可检测变化。

Assessing the Smallest Detectable Change of the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale Score in an Adult Population in Japan.

作者信息

Uchida Hiroyuki, Kuroiwa Chiaki, Ohki Sae, Takahashi Kana, Tsuchiya Kenji, Kikuchi Senichiro, Hirao Kazuki

机构信息

Department of Rehabilitation, Kurashiki Heisei Hospital, Kurashiki, Japan.

Graduate School of Health Sciences, Gunma University, Maebashi, Japan.

出版信息

Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2023 Jul 13;16:2647-2654. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S417446. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.2147/PRBM.S417446
PMID:37465046
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10351679/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Psychological distress is prevalent worldwide and can lead to the development of mental conditions such as major depression and anxiety disorders. It is essential to assess the severity of patient-reported outcomes to provide effective treatment for psychological distress. The Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K6) is one of the most widely used psychological distress scales. However, the smallest detectable change (SDC) of the K6 score has not been elucidated. Therefore, the current study aimed to determine the SDC of the K6 score in a Japanese adult population.

METHODS

Participants aged 20-59 years who are native Japanese speakers were recruited from the panel list of a web research firm. The K6 score was assessed at baseline (T1) and at 2-week follow-up (T2). SDCs were calculated at the individual (SDC) and group (SDC) levels. Intraclass correlation coefficient agreement (ICC) was calculated to assess test-retest reliability and Cronbach's alpha to evaluate internal consistency.

RESULTS

A total of 3254 (1627 [50%] female) responded at T1 and T2. The mean (standard deviation) K6 scores were 5.71 (5.84) at T1 and 5.65 (5.83) at T2. The SDC and SDC of the K6 score were 8.47 (35.31%) and 0.15 (0.63%), respectively. The ICC was 0.73, and the Cronbach's alpha was 0.94.

CONCLUSION

Our study provided evidence on the reliability and interpretation of the K6 score. Calculating the SDC of the K6 score can help identify the significance of changes in psychological distress over time and can determine the efficacy of interventions for psychological distress.

摘要

背景

心理困扰在全球范围内普遍存在,并可能导致诸如重度抑郁症和焦虑症等精神疾病的发生。评估患者报告结局的严重程度对于提供有效的心理困扰治疗至关重要。凯斯勒心理困扰量表(K6)是使用最广泛的心理困扰量表之一。然而,K6评分的最小可检测变化(SDC)尚未阐明。因此,本研究旨在确定日本成年人群中K6评分的SDC。

方法

从一家网络研究公司的样本列表中招募了20至59岁的以日语为母语的参与者。在基线(T1)和2周随访(T2)时评估K6评分。在个体(SDC)和组(SDC)水平上计算SDC。计算组内相关系数一致性(ICC)以评估重测信度,并计算克朗巴哈系数以评估内部一致性。

结果

共有3254人(1627人[50%]为女性)在T1和T2时做出回应。T1时K6评分的平均值(标准差)为5.71(5.84),T2时为5.65(5.83)。K6评分的SDC和SDC分别为8.47(35.31%)和0.15(0.63%)。ICC为0.73,克朗巴哈系数为0.94。

结论

我们的研究为K6评分的可靠性和解释提供了证据。计算K6评分的SDC有助于确定心理困扰随时间变化的意义,并可确定心理困扰干预措施的疗效。