a Department of Psychology , University of Regensburg , Regensburg , Germany.
Cogn Emot. 2018 Jun;32(4):852-859. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2017.1359496. Epub 2017 Jul 31.
A large body of research shows that emotionally significant stimuli are better stored in memory. One question that has received much less attention is how emotional memories are influenced by factors that influence memories after the initial encoding of stimuli. Intriguingly, several recent studies suggest that post-encoding factors do not differ in their effects on emotional and neutral memories. However, to date, only detrimental factors have been addressed. In the present study, we examined whether emotionally negative memories are differentially influenced by a well-known beneficial factor: the testing of memories. We employed a standard cued recall testing-effect paradigm where participants studied cue-target pairs for negative and neutral target pictures. In a subsequent post-encoding phase, one third of the cue-target pairs were tested and one third restudied; the remaining third served as control pairs. After one week, memory for all cue-target pairs was tested. While replicating both the testing effect and the emotional enhancement effect, no differences between negative and neutral memories in the benefits received from testing and restudying were observed. Thus, it seems to be true that post-encoding factors do not influence emotional memories in any other way than neutral memories, even when they are beneficial.
大量研究表明,情感意义重大的刺激在记忆中存储得更好。一个受到关注较少的问题是,在初始刺激编码后,影响记忆的因素如何影响情绪记忆。有趣的是,最近的几项研究表明,在编码后因素对情绪记忆和中性记忆的影响方面没有差异。然而,到目前为止,仅研究了有害因素。在本研究中,我们考察了情绪消极记忆是否会受到一个众所周知的有益因素的不同影响:测试记忆。我们采用了标准的提示回忆测试效应范式,参与者学习带有负性和中性目标图片的提示-目标对。在随后的编码后阶段,三分之一的提示-目标对被测试,三分之一的提示-目标对被重新学习;其余三分之一作为对照组。一周后,对所有提示-目标对进行记忆测试。虽然复制了测试效应和情绪增强效应,但在测试和重新学习获得的收益方面,负性记忆和中性记忆之间没有差异。因此,似乎确实是这样,即使是有益的,在编码后因素也不会以任何不同于中性记忆的方式影响情绪记忆。