Etheredge Harriet, Fabian June
Wits Donald Gordon Medical Centre, 27 Eton Road, Parktown, 2193 Johannesburg, South Africa.
Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, 7 York Road, Parktown, 2193 Johannesburg, South Africa.
Healthcare (Basel). 2017 Jul 31;5(3):38. doi: 10.3390/healthcare5030038.
South Africa is a country with two distinct health sectors, which are both characterised by inequalities. Within this context, patients with end stage renal disease face unique and sometimes impenetrable barriers to accessing dialysis. There are a number of reasons for this situation. These include: the South African government's endorsement of discordant, unequal policies, which disadvantage the most vulnerable; a lack of robust national guidelines; and divisive rationing practices, which are ad hoc and place the burden of responsibility for rationing dialysis on the clinician. In this paper, we trace the socio-economic mechanisms of how we have come to be in this situation, and overlay this with a detailed examination of South African legislation. Finally, we make comprehensive practical recommendations for rectifying the situation, which include engagement with key stakeholders, public-private partnerships, and more equitable funding mechanisms.
南非是一个拥有两个截然不同的医疗部门的国家,这两个部门都存在不平等现象。在此背景下,终末期肾病患者在获取透析治疗方面面临独特且有时难以逾越的障碍。造成这种情况有多种原因。这些原因包括:南非政府认可不一致、不平等的政策,这些政策使最弱势群体处于不利地位;缺乏强有力的国家指导方针;以及存在临时性的、造成分裂的配给做法,将透析配给的责任负担加在了临床医生身上。在本文中,我们追溯了导致我们陷入这种局面的社会经济机制,并在此基础上详细审视了南非的立法。最后,我们针对纠正这种局面提出了全面的实际建议,其中包括与关键利益相关者进行接触、公私伙伴关系以及更公平的筹资机制。