Avera Sports Institute, Avera McKennan Hospital and University Health Center, Sioux Falls, South Dakota.
Department of Health and Nutritional Sciences, South Dakota State University, Brookings, South Dakota.
J Strength Cond Res. 2019 May;33(5):1354-1361. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001934.
Ferley, DD and Vukovich, MD. Predicting the intensity for performing supramaximal incline treadmill interval training in distance runners. J Strength Cond Res 33(5): 1354-1361, 2019-Recent evidence highlights the effectiveness of 30-second bouts paired with level-grade supramaximal interval training (SMIT) and incline treadmill training (INC), respectively, in distance runners. Although INC has been described as a form of SMIT, no investigation of INC involving a supramaximal intensity and 30-second bouts has occurred; hence, no established recommendation for prescribing a supramaximal intensity with 30-second bouts for INC exists. Therefore, the purpose of this investigation included reporting on the time-to-exhaustion (Tmax) response and test-retest reliability of running on a 5% grade using supramaximal intensities of 110, 115, 120, 125, and 130% of the velocity associated with maximum oxygen consumption (Vmax). Additionally, these measures were assessed during 140% Vmax and 1% grade. A second aim included determining the %Vmax associated with a 30-second effort via bivariate analysis. Twelve distance runners (age, 26.9 ± 4.8 years; body mass, 69.2 ± 11.7 kg; height, 177.3 ± 10.2 cm; and V[Combining Dot Above]O2max, 61.4 ± 6.3 ml·kg·min) completed 2 Tmax trials at each intensity for measures of reliability. The dependent variable was the Tmax of each condition. Statistical significance was set to p ≤ 0.05. Student's t-test revealed no significant differences between trials for all intensities. One-way analysis of variance revealed (a) that Tmax during INC at 110% Vmax was significantly different than all conditions except 115% Vmax and (b) no significant difference in Tmax between 120, 125, 130, and 140% Vmax conditions. In conclusion, Tmax of all conditions proved reliable, and bivariate analysis revealed running at 125% Vmax on a 5% grade yielded a 30-second effort.
费利,DD 和武科维奇,医学博士。预测进行最大强度递增倾斜跑步机间歇训练的强度在长跑运动员中。J 强能力研究 33(5):1354-1361,2019 年-最近的证据强调了 30 秒回合与水平坡度最大强度间歇训练 (SMIT) 和倾斜跑步机训练 (INC) 分别在长跑运动员中的有效性。虽然 INC 已被描述为 SMIT 的一种形式,但尚未进行涉及最大强度和 30 秒回合的 INC 调查;因此,没有关于在 INC 中以 30 秒回合规定最大强度的既定建议。因此,本研究的目的包括报告在 5%坡度上以 110、115、120、125 和 130%与最大摄氧量相关的速度的最大强度进行跑步的时间到衰竭 (Tmax) 反应和测试-重测可靠性(Vmax)。此外,这些措施在 140%Vmax 和 1%坡度下进行了评估。第二个目的包括通过二元分析确定与 30 秒努力相关的%Vmax。12 名长跑运动员(年龄 26.9 ± 4.8 岁;体重 69.2 ± 11.7 公斤;身高 177.3 ± 10.2 厘米;V[Combining Dot Above]O2max,61.4 ± 6.3 ml·kg·min)在每个强度下完成了 2 次 Tmax 试验,以进行可靠性测量。因变量是每个条件的 Tmax。统计学意义设为 p ≤ 0.05。学生 t 检验显示,所有强度的试验之间没有显著差异。单因素方差分析显示 (a) INC 时的 Tmax 在 110%Vmax 时与除 115%Vmax 之外的所有条件显着不同,并且 (b) 120、125、130 和 140%Vmax 条件之间的 Tmax 没有显着差异。总之,所有条件的 Tmax 都被证明是可靠的,二元分析显示在 5%的坡度上以 125%的 Vmax 跑步可产生 30 秒的努力。