• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

A novel PLIF PEEK interbody cage with an impactionless insertion technology: A case series with a mid-term follow up of three years.

作者信息

Struwe Charlotte, Hermann Pia C, Bornemann Rahel, Plöger Milena, Roessler Philip P, Strauss Andreas C, Rommelspacher Yorck, Koch Ernst M W, Pflugmacher Robert

出版信息

Technol Health Care. 2017 Oct 23;25(5):949-957. doi: 10.3233/THC-160721.

DOI:10.3233/THC-160721
PMID:28759978
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Spinal fusion surgery has become one of the most common spinal procedures during the recent years. Searching for an optimum structural stability of the vertebral interspace, surgical implants which can be inserted via a posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) approach have been enhanced recently.

OBJECTIVE

Evaluation of safety and efficacy of a novel PLIF polyetheretherketone (PEEK) interbody cage (TWIST) with an impactionless insertion technique.

METHODS

Surgical outcome in 15 patients treated with the new system were observed preoperatively, one and three years after surgery using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain and radiological outcome analysis of fusion success.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients (7 female, 8 male) were included in the test series. After three years ODI and VAS were significantly improved. The pain intensity was reduced by more than 75% after one year and after 3 years, pain intensity was about 60% below the initial situation. The Oswestry values (ODI) improved significantly in all patients after 3 years. The fusion evaluation showed a fusion success in 87% of the patients.

CONCLUSION

The clinical and radiological results of this first series give a positive standing and important information on the efficacy and safety over 3 years. The follow-up checks with imaging techniques showed that the fusions were very successful and functional outcome as well as pain reduction were increased.

摘要

相似文献

1
A novel PLIF PEEK interbody cage with an impactionless insertion technology: A case series with a mid-term follow up of three years.
Technol Health Care. 2017 Oct 23;25(5):949-957. doi: 10.3233/THC-160721.
2
Outcomes of autograft alone versus PEEK+ autograft interbody fusion in the treatment of adult lumbar isthmic spondylolisthesis.单纯自体骨移植与聚醚醚酮(PEEK)+自体骨椎间融合术治疗成人峡部裂型腰椎滑脱的疗效比较
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2017 Apr;155:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2017.01.020. Epub 2017 Jan 31.
3
Posterior lumbar interbody fusion using non resorbable poly-ether-ether-ketone versus resorbable poly-L-lactide-co-D,L-lactide fusion devices. Clinical outcome at a minimum of 2-year follow-up.后路腰椎体间融合术使用不可吸收聚醚醚酮与可吸收聚 L-乳酸-co-D,L-乳酸融合装置的比较。至少 2 年随访的临床结果。
Eur Spine J. 2011 Apr;20(4):618-22. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1568-6. Epub 2010 Sep 15.
4
Comparison of polyetheretherketone cages with femoral cortical bone allograft as a single-piece interbody spacer in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.聚醚醚酮椎间融合器与股骨皮质骨同种异体移植作为单节段椎间融合器在经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术中的比较。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2006 Dec;5(6):534-9. doi: 10.3171/spi.2006.5.6.534.
5
Comparison of the PEEK cage and an autologous cage made from the lumbar spinous process and laminae in posterior lumbar interbody fusion.聚醚醚酮椎间融合器与由腰椎棘突和椎板制成的自体椎间融合器在腰椎后路椎间融合中的比较。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Aug 30;17(1):374. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-1237-y.
6
Posterior lumbar interbody fusion versus posterolateral fusion in adult isthmic spondylolisthesis.成人峡部裂性腰椎滑脱的后路腰椎椎间融合术与后外侧融合术的比较
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Sep 15;32(20):2178-83. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31814b1bd8.
7
Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a safe technique with satisfactory three to five year results.经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术:一种安全的技术,三至五年的效果令人满意。
Eur Spine J. 2005 Aug;14(6):551-8. doi: 10.1007/s00586-004-0830-1. Epub 2005 Jan 26.
8
Posterior lumbar interbody fusion using nonresorbable poly-ether-ether-ketone versus resorbable poly-L-lactide-co-D,L-lactide fusion devices: a prospective, randomized study to assess fusion and clinical outcome.使用不可吸收聚醚醚酮与可吸收聚-L-丙交酯-共-D,L-丙交酯融合装置进行腰椎后路椎间融合术:一项评估融合及临床结果的前瞻性随机研究
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Feb 1;34(3):233-7. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318194ed00.
9
Early experience with endoscopic revision of lumbar spinal fusions.腰椎融合术内镜翻修的早期经验。
Neurosurg Focus. 2016 Feb;40(2):E10. doi: 10.3171/2015.10.FOCUS15503.
10
Complete anatomic reduction and monosegmental fusion for lumbar spondylolisthesis of Grade II and higher: use of the minimally invasive "rocking" technique.II级及以上腰椎滑脱的全解剖复位和单节段融合:微创“摇摆”技术的应用
Neurosurg Focus. 2017 Aug;43(2):E12. doi: 10.3171/2017.5.FOCUS17199.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of instrumentation and pedicle screw design for posterior lumbar fixation: A pre-clinical ovine model.用于后路腰椎固定的器械和椎弓根螺钉设计评估:一种临床前绵羊模型。
JOR Spine. 2023 Jan 13;6(2):e1245. doi: 10.1002/jsp2.1245. eCollection 2023 Jun.
2
Lumbar interbody fusion: recent advances in surgical techniques and bone healing strategies.腰椎体间融合:手术技术和骨愈合策略的最新进展。
Eur Spine J. 2021 Jan;30(1):22-33. doi: 10.1007/s00586-020-06596-0. Epub 2020 Sep 19.