Mende Klaus C, Krätzig Theresa, Mohme Malte, Westphal Manfred, Eicker Sven O
Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Hamburg, Germany.
Neurosurg Focus. 2017 Aug;43(2):E5. doi: 10.3171/2017.5.FOCUS17198.
OBJECTIVE Spinal tumors account for 2%-4% of all tumors of the central nervous system and can be intramedullary, intradural extramedullary, or extradural. In the past, wide approaches were used to obtain safe access to these tumors, as complete resection is the goal in treating most tumor entities. To reduce surgical complications due to large skin incisions and destabilizing laminectomies, minimally invasive approaches were established. In this study, the authors share their experience with mini-open approaches to intradural tumor pathologies. METHODS The authors retrospectively reviewed cases involving patients with intramedullary and intradural extramedullary lesions treated between 2009 and 2016. They present their surgical mini-open approach to the spinal cord as well as unique characteristics, key steps, and postsurgical complications for specific tumor subgroups (meningioma, neuroma, and intramedullary tumors). RESULTS A total of 245 intradural tumors were surgically treated during the study period. Of these lesions, 151 were intradural extramedullary meningiomas (n = 79) or neuromas (n = 72). Nine (12.5%) of the neuromas were dumbbell neuromas. Ninety-four tumors were intramedullary. The mean age of the patients was 51.4 years, and 53.9% were female. The mean duration of follow-up was 46.0 months. All meningiomas and neuromas could be resected using a mini-open keyhole approach, but only 5.3% of the intramedullary lesions could be accessed using this technique. Of the 94 patients with intramedullary tumors, 76.6% required a laminotomy, 7.4% required a hemilaminectomy, and 10.6% required a 2-level laminectomy. Only 2 of the patients with intramedullary tumors needed stabilization for progressive cervical kyphosis during follow-up. None of the other patients developed spinal instability after undergoing surgery via the mini-open (keyhole/interlaminar) approach. There were significantly more surgery-associated complications in the large exposure group than in the patients treated with the mini-open approach (19.1% vs 9.6%, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Intradural extramedullary and in selected cases intramedullary pathologies may safely be resected using a mini-open interlaminar approach. Avoiding laminectomy, laminotomy, and even hemilaminectomy preserves spinal stability and significantly reduces comorbidities, while still allowing for complete resection of these tumors.
脊柱肿瘤占中枢神经系统所有肿瘤的2% - 4%,可分为髓内、硬脊膜内髓外或硬脊膜外肿瘤。过去,为安全切除这些肿瘤常采用广泛的手术入路,因为大多数肿瘤实体的治疗目标是完全切除。为减少因大的皮肤切口和不稳定的椎板切除术导致的手术并发症,微创入路应运而生。在本研究中,作者分享了他们采用迷你开放入路治疗硬脊膜内肿瘤病变的经验。
作者回顾性分析了2009年至2016年间治疗的髓内和硬脊膜内髓外病变患者的病例。他们介绍了针对脊髓的手术迷你开放入路以及特定肿瘤亚组(脑膜瘤、神经瘤和髓内肿瘤)的独特特征、关键步骤和术后并发症。
在研究期间共手术治疗了245例硬脊膜内肿瘤。其中,151例为硬脊膜内髓外脑膜瘤(n = 79)或神经瘤(n = 72)。9例(12.5%)神经瘤为哑铃形神经瘤。94例为髓内肿瘤。患者的平均年龄为51.4岁,53.9%为女性。平均随访时间为46.0个月。所有脑膜瘤和神经瘤均可采用迷你开放锁孔入路切除,但该技术仅能处理5.3%的髓内病变。在94例髓内肿瘤患者中,76.6%需要行椎板切开术,7.4%需要行半椎板切除术,10.6%需要行双节段椎板切除术。随访期间,只有2例髓内肿瘤患者因颈椎后凸进展需要进行固定。采用迷你开放(锁孔/椎板间)入路手术后,其他患者均未出现脊柱不稳定。大切口暴露组的手术相关并发症明显多于采用迷你开放入路治疗的患者(19.1%对9.6%,p < 0.01)。
硬脊膜内髓外肿瘤以及部分髓内病变可通过迷你开放椎板间入路安全切除。避免椎板切除术、椎板切开术甚至半椎板切除术可保持脊柱稳定性并显著降低并发症发生率,同时仍能实现这些肿瘤的完全切除。