Pickett Andrew C, Valdez Danny, Barry Adam E
Assistant Professor, Division of Kinesiology and Sport Management, University of South Dakota, Vermillion, SD;, Email:
Graduate Research Assistant, Department of Health and Kinesiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.
Am J Health Behav. 2017 Sep 1;41(5):544-552. doi: 10.5993/AJHB.41.5.3.
Despite numerous calls for increased understanding and reporting of reliability estimates, social science research, including the field of health behavior, has been slow to respond and adopt such practices. Therefore, we offer a brief overview of reliability and common reporting errors; we then perform analyses to examine and demonstrate the variability of reliability estimates by sample and over time.
Using meta-analytic reliability generalization, we examined the variability of coefficient alpha scores for a well-designed, consistent, nationwide health study, covering a span of nearly 40 years.
For each year and sample, reliability varied. Furthermore, reliability was predicted by a sample characteristic that differed among age groups within each administration.
We demonstrated that reliability is influenced by the methods and individuals from which a given sample is drawn. Our work echoes previous calls that psychometric properties, particularly reliability of scores, are important and must be considered and reported before drawing statistical conclusions.
尽管多次呼吁加强对信度估计的理解和报告,但包括健康行为领域在内的社会科学研究在回应和采用此类做法方面一直较为迟缓。因此,我们简要概述了信度及常见的报告错误;然后进行分析,以检验并展示信度估计在不同样本及不同时间的变异性。
我们运用元分析信度泛化方法,对一项设计良好、连贯且覆盖全国范围、历时近40年的健康研究中的α系数得分变异性进行了考察。
每年及每个样本的信度都有所不同。此外,信度可由每次施测中各年龄组间存在差异的一个样本特征来预测。
我们证明了信度会受到抽取给定样本的方法和个体的影响。我们的研究呼应了此前的呼吁,即心理测量特性,尤其是分数的信度,非常重要,在得出统计结论之前必须加以考虑和报告。