Louisiana State University.
Psychol Assess. 2019 Mar;31(3):285-291. doi: 10.1037/pas0000599.
Ambulatory assessment studies have unique challenges related to obtaining adequate reliability relative to other types of research designs. For example, because of time constraints, limitations in the number of items administered at each occasion can negatively affect the reliable assessment of within-person change. Whereas some types of measures, such as objective measures of physical activity, have been the focus of a cumulative body of reliability research, a lack of reporting of reliability data for cognitive and self-report measures in many studies is a significant barrier for researchers who want to choose measures based on prior psychometric research. Several approaches to assessing the reliability of ambulatory assessment data are available, and further research with less widely used reliability metrics (e.g., stability in within-person variability across time) is warranted. Given the time and effort involved in conducting ambulatory assessment studies, proper consideration of reliability is needed so that researchers have sufficient power to take advantage of the large amount of data often available within a single ambulatory assessment study. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
动态评估研究具有独特的挑战,与其他类型的研究设计相比,它们在获得足够的可靠性方面存在困难。例如,由于时间限制,在每个时间点上管理的项目数量有限,这可能会对个体内变化的可靠评估产生负面影响。虽然某些类型的测量方法,如身体活动的客观测量,已经成为可靠性研究的重点,但在许多研究中,认知和自我报告测量的可靠性数据缺乏报告,这对于希望根据先前心理测量学研究选择测量方法的研究人员来说是一个重大障碍。目前已有多种评估动态评估数据可靠性的方法,并且需要进一步研究使用较少的可靠性指标(例如,个体内随时间变化的稳定性)。考虑到进行动态评估研究所涉及的时间和精力,需要适当考虑可靠性,以便研究人员有足够的能力利用单个动态评估研究中通常可用的大量数据。(PsycINFO 数据库记录(c)2019 APA,保留所有权利)。