Suppr超能文献

是给予怀疑的好处还是对益处存疑?对欧洲人群中疫苗感知风险的系统文献综述。

The benefit of the doubt or doubts over benefits? A systematic literature review of perceived risks of vaccines in European populations.

作者信息

Karafillakis Emilie, Larson Heidi J

机构信息

Vaccine Confidence Project, London School of Hygiene & Tropical medicine, London, United Kingdom.

Vaccine Confidence Project, London School of Hygiene & Tropical medicine, London, United Kingdom; Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.

出版信息

Vaccine. 2017 Sep 5;35(37):4840-4850. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.07.061. Epub 2017 Jul 29.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The success of vaccination strategies depends in part on population perceptions of benefits and risks of vaccines and related confidence in vaccination. Better knowledge of public concerns about vaccines and what is driving them is needed to inform vaccination strategies and communications. This literature reviewer examined studies on vaccine and vaccination risk perceptions and concerns across European populations.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was conducted to identify studies published between 2004 and 2014 in Europe. A descriptive analysis was performed.

FINDINGS

A total of 145 articles were selected, most of which were conducted in the UK, the Netherlands and France and studied seasonal influenza, HPV and pandemic influenza vaccination. Across all countries and vaccines, the primary area of concern was vaccine safety, followed by perceptions of low likelihood of contracting vaccine-preventable diseases (VPDs), perceived low severity of VPDs, beliefs that vaccines do not work, and overall lack of information. Concerns were found to be vaccine-, country- and population-specific.

CONCLUSION

In addition to identifying concerns about vaccination in Europe, this study confirmed the notion that individuals have many safety concerns about vaccination and often believe that the risks of vaccination outweigh their benefits. More research needs to be conducted to explore the impact of different types of communication strategies, which would frame the benefits of vaccination as well as risks of not vaccinating. Strategies to better inform public perceptions of vaccines should include the provision of unbiased, comprehensive information tailored to population information needs, and delivered using multiple and new communication technologies such as social media.

摘要

目标

疫苗接种策略的成功部分取决于民众对疫苗益处和风险的认知以及对疫苗接种的相关信心。为了为疫苗接种策略和宣传提供依据,需要更好地了解公众对疫苗的担忧及其背后的原因。这篇文献综述考察了欧洲人群对疫苗及疫苗接种风险的认知和担忧的相关研究。

方法

进行了一项系统性文献综述,以确定2004年至2014年期间在欧洲发表的研究。进行了描述性分析。

结果

共筛选出145篇文章,其中大部分在英国、荷兰和法国开展,研究对象为季节性流感、人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)和大流行性流感疫苗接种。在所有国家和疫苗中,主要担忧领域是疫苗安全性,其次是认为感染疫苗可预防疾病(VPDs)的可能性低、认为VPDs的严重程度低、认为疫苗无效以及普遍缺乏信息。研究发现,担忧因疫苗、国家和人群而异。

结论

除了确定欧洲对疫苗接种的担忧外,本研究还证实了这样一种观点,即个人对疫苗接种存在诸多安全担忧,且往往认为接种疫苗的风险大于益处。需要开展更多研究来探索不同类型宣传策略的影响,这些策略应既阐述疫苗接种的益处,也说明不接种疫苗的风险。提高公众对疫苗认知的策略应包括提供无偏见的、根据人群信息需求量身定制的全面信息,并使用社交媒体等多种新型通信技术来传播这些信息。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验